<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/" -->

---
title: Donald Trump's Border Wall Emergency Could Make Us Less Safe
description: President Trump's border wall emergency declaration could lead to a backlash that would constrain him and future presidents in a crisis.
canonical: https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/
author: TIME
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2019-03-11T14:40:43.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:49:47.654Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: President Trump's Border Wall Emergency Could Make Americans Less Safe
og:description: It may make us less safe in the event of an outbreak.
og:url: https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc52008182ad013e/69892ab27cdbac1bc6d5c466/trump-wall-california.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
og:image:width: 5214
og:image:height: 2933
og:image:alt: APTOPIX Trump California
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: President Trump's Border Wall Emergency Could Make Americans Less Safe
twitter:description: It may make us less safe in the event of an outbreak.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc52008182ad013e/69892ab27cdbac1bc6d5c466/trump-wall-california.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc52008182ad013e/69892ab27cdbac1bc6d5c466/trump-wall-california.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# President Trump's Border Wall Emergency Could Make Americans Less Safe

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="a6dc3951-76dd-41a0-87e9-652b0439455b" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a6dc3951-76dd-41a0-87e9-652b0439455b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a6dc3951-76dd-41a0-87e9-652b0439455b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=a6dc3951-76dd-41a0-87e9-652b0439455b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a6dc3951-76dd-41a0-87e9-652b0439455b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/tAkI25pN.m3u8" -->
## Video: 16 States Sue President Trump Over National Emergency Declaration

[Watch (HLS stream): 16 States Sue President Trump Over National Emergency Declaration](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/tAkI25pN.m3u8) (1:32)

![16 States Sue President Trump Over National Emergency Declaration](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/tAkI25pN/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2019-02-19. California and 15 other states filed a lawsuit Monday against President Donald Trump’s emergency declaration to fund a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border._


by [James G. Hodge, Jr.](https://time.com/author/james-g-hodge-jr/) and [Lawrence O. Gostin](https://time.com/author/lawrence-o-gostin/)

Mar 11, 2019 2:40 PM UTC

![APTOPIX Trump California](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc52008182ad013e/69892ab27cdbac1bc6d5c466/trump-wall-california.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

President Trump reviews border wall prototypes on March 13, 2018, in San Diego

President Trump reviews border wall prototypes on March 13, 2018, in San Diego Evan Vucci—AP

by [James G. Hodge, Jr.](https://time.com/author/james-g-hodge-jr/) and [Lawrence O. Gostin](https://time.com/author/lawrence-o-gostin/)

Mar 11, 2019 2:40 PM UTC

Arguing that his proposed border wall with Mexico is needed to respond to a public health and humanitarian crisis, President Donald Trump [declared a national state of emergency](http://time.com/5530506/donald-trump-emergency-border-fact-check/) to secure the authority and resources to build it. The problem is that it may actually make Americans less healthy and safe in other ways.

As public health law experts, we assess how emergency declarations are used in the aftermath of natural disasters like hurricanes or wildfires, during outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases like Ebola and for other public health crises.

The president’s unprecedented use of the executive branch’s broad powers to declare emergencies could lead to a backlash that would constrain him and future presidents needing to use emergency powers later, while increasing public skepticism of critical health responses.

President Trump’s border wall emergency is unpopular. Polls show that [over 60% of Americans oppose significant new wall construction](https://news.gallup.com/poll/246455/solid-majority-opposes-new-construction-border-wall.aspx). Nearly the same percentage feel that no emergency exists at the order.

The House has already [passed a joint resolution](http://time.com/5539557/house-block-trump-wall-emergency/) opposing the declaration, and with several Republican senators expressing their unease with the maneuver, the other chamber could follow suit as well. Although the president would surely veto any attempt to overturn his emergency declaration, this would mark the first time that Congress has expressly opposed such a move.


Meanwhile, [16 states have filed lawsuits](http://time.com/5532144/states-sue-donald-trump-emergency/) to overturn the emergency. Public Citizen and the Americans Civil Liberties Union have filed separate cases. Allegations include that the president acted unconstitutionally in the face of Congressional refusal to allocate funding. The Supreme Court may have the final word and could dramatically limit the president’s authority in this area.

Outcomes of the profound legal and political responses to the border wall declaration are tenuous, but potentially game-changing particularly in how future public health emergencies are handled.

Emergency processes that are supposed to allow the executive to rely on science, reason and resources have become increasingly politicized. In 2016, Congress [failed for months](http://time.com/4481394/zika-funding-congress-stalled/) to fully authorize funds for President Barack Obama’s emergency for the Zika virus. During the delay, American women and infants faced unnecessary risks of infection.


Drafters of the [National Emergencies Act](http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title50/chapter34&edition=prelim) in 1976 warned against “partisan” or “frivolous” exercise of presidential emergency powers. If building a border wall qualifies as an emergency now, might rampant gun violence, widespread obesity or global climate change be classified as such tomorrow? Politicians on both sides of the aisle are rightfully questioning the President’s authority based on this reasoning.

The next emerging infectious disease outbreak facing the United States presents an interesting “test case.” In one scenario, the President, briefed with reliable information from the nation’s public health scientists, realizes the risks, but Congress is opposed to an emergency declaration due to public apathy. Will the President still be able to declare an emergency to save lives? In another scenario, public health officials are discounting the risks to Americans, but public fears over infection are stoked, pressing for action. Will a presidential emergency declaration sustain challenges? Outcomes in either scenario depend on how the border wall emergency plays out in court and politically.


Generating constitutional and political conundrums is not the way emergency declarations are supposed to work. For decades, Presidents and governors have declared emergencies to respond to actual public health exigencies. They empower agencies to carry out extraordinary measures to safeguard the public’s health: allocate funds, mobilize key personnel, waive legal barriers, enhance coordination, permit licensing reciprocity and offer temporary liability protections. Responsible use of these powers improves public and private sector emergency responses. Lives are saved, injury and disease are prevented.

Rarely have courts been asked to review emergency powers. Politicization of emergency declarations will only provoke more court challenges, essentially handing over key decisions in a crisis to the judiciary. This is untenable. Execution of emergency powers in response to public health threats requires timely and sustained responses that judicial delays will impair.


It also requires access to funds set aside by Congress for appropriate emergency purposes. President Trump’s attempt to reallocate existing emergency funds to build the wall is troubling. How willing might members of Congress be to renew emergency funds for future Presidents to drain on unwarranted declarations? Or legitimate declarations that Congress does not agree with politically? Could future Presidents also tap into emergency coffers like a “rainy day” fund to achieve political objectives?

The repercussions of the border wall emergency on public health preparedness are immense. Building a wall on the premise of American security may ultimately make us all less safe from risks of infectious disease and other public health threats no wall can stop.


## Transcript

[ MUSIC ] [ MUSIC ] Well, we are going to try to halt the president from violating the Constitution, the separation of powers, from stealing money from Americans and states that has been allocated by the Congress lawfully, and we are going to try to make sure we keep the president from continuing to play this theater. By manipulating the office of the president to do his bidding, simply because I think he's trying to essentially send a message to his base, a shrinking base, that he fulfills his promises. [ MUSIC ] We're going to be signing Today and registering national emergency and [ BLANK_AUDIO ] It's a great thing to do [ SOUND ].

[ MUSIC ]

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/"},"headline":"President Trump's Border Wall Emergency Could Make Americans Less Safe","datePublished":"2019-03-11T14:40:43.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:49:47.654Z","description":"President Trump's border wall emergency declaration could lead to a backlash that would constrain him and future presidents in a crisis.","url":"https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/","keywords":["Immigration","White House","Donald Trump","border wall"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc52008182ad013e/69892ab27cdbac1bc6d5c466/trump-wall-california.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"James G. Hodge, Jr.","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/james-g-hodge-jr/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Lawrence O. Gostin","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/lawrence-o-gostin/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltbc52008182ad013e/69892ab27cdbac1bc6d5c466/trump-wall-california.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"APTOPIX Trump California","caption":"APTOPIX Trump California","creditText":"Evan Vucci—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/immigration/","name":"Immigration"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/","name":"President Trump's Border Wall Emergency Could Make Americans Less Safe"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"16 States Sue President Trump Over National Emergency Declaration","description":"California and 15 other states filed a lawsuit Monday against President Donald Trump’s emergency declaration to fund a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/tAkI25pN/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2019-02-19T03:17:17.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/tAkI25pN.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/","duration":"PT1M32S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5549023/donald-trump-border-wall-emergency-public-health/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

