After President Donald Trump said on Friday he “may pardon” Muhammad Ali, the late boxer’s attorney responded that the pardon would be “unnecessary.”
“We appreciate President Trump’s sentiment, but a pardon is unnecessary,” the statement from Ron Tweel said. “The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the conviction of Muhammad Ali in a unanimous decision in 1971. There is no conviction from which a pardon is needed.”
Trump had said earlier Friday morning that he was “very seriously” considering pardoning Ali amid a string of recent pardons and commutations from the President, including the late boxer Jack Johnson, who received a rare posthumous pardon in May.
Ali was arrested in 1967 when he refused to be drafted into the U.S. military during the Vietnam conflict. The boxer refused three times to step forward when his name was called at his draft induction in April of that year, for which he faced a $10,000 fine and up to five years in prison.
“My conscience won’t let me go shoot my brother, or some darker people, or some poor hungry people in the mud for big powerful America,” Ali said at the time. Shoot them for what? How can I shoot them poor people? Just take me to jail.”
Ali was eventually convicted of violating Selective Service laws and sentenced to five years in prison.
However, as Ali’s lawyer pointed out in the statement, during the 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case Clay v. U.S., Ali was cleared of all charges. The court unanimously decided he was in fact a true contentious objector and not just a draft dodger.
“In this Court the Government has now fully conceded that the petitioner’s beliefs are based upon ‘religious training and belief,” the court’s opinion said. “For the record shows that the petitioner’s beliefs are founded on tenets of the Muslim religion as he understands them.”
- Meet TIME’s Newest Class of Next Generation Leaders
- After Visiting Both Ends of the Earth, I Realized How Much Trouble We’re In
- Google Is Making It Easier to Remove Personal Info From Search
- Oil Companies Posted Huge Profits. Here’s Where The Cash Will Go (Hint: Not Climate)
- Column: We Asked Hundreds of Americans About Abortion. Their Feelings Were Complicated
- A Short History of the Rise, Fall, and Rise Again of the Marcos Family
- Long-Lasting Birth Control Is Already Hard to Get. Advocates Worry It May Only Get Worse
- Who Should Be on the 2022 TIME100? Vote Now