--- title: Why 'Thoughts and Prayers' Are Causing Controversy description: The hubbub surrounding these three words is about gun control and religion. But it's also about cliches and why we turn to them in tragedy. canonical: https://time.com/5016382/thoughts-and-prayers-mass-shootings-language/ author: Katy Steinmetz article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-11-09T19:12:25.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T11:21:46.810Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why 'Thoughts and Prayers' Is a Double-Edged Sword og:description: Debate over the words is about gun control and religion. It's also about the uses of language. og:url: https://time.com/5016382/thoughts-and-prayers-mass-shootings-language/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce8f9f1bf8ff865/6988e5367cdbac5962d5ad2b/texas.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2450 og:image:height: 1378 og:image:alt: Texas Vigil og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why 'Thoughts and Prayers' Is a Double-Edged Sword twitter:description: Debate over the words is about gun control and religion. It's also about the uses of language. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce8f9f1bf8ff865/6988e5367cdbac5962d5ad2b/texas.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why 'Thoughts and Prayers' Is a Double-Edged Sword > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3b52640a-d887-4c4f-aa0b-b34edcebad25&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3b52640a-d887-4c4f-aa0b-b34edcebad25&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=3b52640a-d887-4c4f-aa0b-b34edcebad25&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3b52640a-d887-4c4f-aa0b-b34edcebad25&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Katy Steinmetz](https://time.com/author/katy-steinmetz/) ## Katy Steinmetz Nov 9, 2017 7:12 PM UTC  People pray at a vigil, after a mass shooting that killed 26 people in Sutherland Springs, Texas, on Nov. 6, 2017. People pray at a vigil, after a mass shooting that killed 26 people in Sutherland Springs, Texas, on Nov. 6, 2017. Mark Ralston—AFP/Getty Images by [Katy Steinmetz](https://time.com/author/katy-steinmetz/) ## Katy Steinmetz Nov 9, 2017 7:12 PM UTC After the [horrific shooting](http://time.com/5010772/texas-sutherland-springs-church-shooting/) at a church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, on Sunday, a rhetorical tennis match ensued. Some politicians offered up their “thoughts and prayers,” as many have following [other mass shootings](https://twitter.com/PressSec/status/914819090350530560). Others responded by [criticizing](http://time.com/5011550/texas-church-shooting-thoughts-prayers-gun-control/) “thoughts and prayers” as a pathetic substitute for taking concrete action. On Wednesday night’s episode of _Full Frontal_, Samantha Bee even organized[ a gospel choir](http://ew.com/tv/2017/11/09/samantha-bee-gospel-choir-thoughts-prayers-gun-violence/) to parody the phrase. Those critics, often liberals, were then [taken to task](https://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-friends-guest-those-rejecting-thoughts-and-prayers-after-texas-have-more-in-common-with-the-shooter/) for their unholy dismissal of “thoughts and prayers,” which in turn led to [criticisms that those criticisms](https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/11/07/we-object-to-republicans-hypocrisy-on-guns-not-thoughts-and-prayers/?utm%5Fterm=.4e3f318bcf93) were just a deflection guarding another deflection. The hubbub surrounding these three words goes deep, centering on gun control and religion, two of American society’s most divisive issues. But the back-and-forth is also about language and the sometimes complicated reactions that we have when people use cliches, especially in sensitive situations. “Cliches have a role as both the comfort food and the junk food of language,” says Orin Hargraves, author of _It’s Been Said Before: A Guide to the Use and Abuse of Cliches._ “It’s the comfort food aspect that comes into play when there is tragedy.” Yet, eat too much of either, and you might feel sick. The word itself comes from printing: In the 1800s, a cliché was a name for a block (also known as stereotype, which is no coincidence) that could produce copy after copy of text. Before the end of that century, the word had shifted to the way we use it now, as a generally negative term for an expression that has become trite from overuse, a sure way to get docked a few points on your English exam. As Hargraves outlines in his book, it’s not easy to say what qualifies as a cliche. There’s no universal voting among English speakers on which expressions have officially become unoriginal. And even if people could agree on that, they’d still disagree on when it was appropriate to use them. A cliche certainly doesn’t feel overused when someone is hearing it for the first time, marveling at the pithiness of “throwing caution to the wind” or the poetry of “hell or high water.” And even after hearing them the thousandth time, they can seem like the best, most economical option for expressing a common idea. “The original, first usage is usually quite appropriate, original and clever,” Hargraves says, “and this is the reason that it spawns imitation.” Politicians (and [journalists](https://www.politico.com/tipsheets/playbook/2013/03/palm-sunday-edition-phrases-to-forget-tip-for-sharp-speaking-writing-lull-in-fiscal-war-till-debt-ceiling-debate-july-ish-ari-emanuel-v-nbc-tim-burger-kiki-ryan-wed-010283)) have long turned to cliches because of the nature of their work. It’s grueling and repetitive, often requiring them to communicate a message to a whole districtful of people, if not an entire country. They generally want to do this in language that won’t be misconstrued, that doesn’t leave them vulnerable to attacks, that feels familiar. Cliches aren’t just overused because they’re clever; they are also safe. You can assume people will know what you mean when you use rhetoric that so many have used before you, even if it is stale as old toast. And no one wants to send a mixed message or draw attention to their own unique musings on the ruins of time when people have lost their lives. Grief often presses us beyond the bounds of logic and even language itself, which is why [many turn to expressions that simply convey the idea that no words will suffice](http://time.com/4965881/unspeakable-tragedy-terrorism-las-vegas/) when something terrible and terrifying happens. But using worn-out words when people are bereaved comes with risks too, and people have been sending “thoughts and prayers” for centuries. Hargraves notes that Bill Clinton was particularly fond of using that phrase as part of the ritual in which a president expresses condolences (and he [still is](https://twitter.com/billclinton/status/902953673885659148?lang=en)). The underlying sentiment is clearly a kind one, an expression of sadness and hope that a higher power will respond with something healing, and there is no counting how many times politicians, of all political stripes, have used it. “In times of tragedy, no one wants to say the wrong thing,” Hargraves says, “and so saying the thing that everyone else says, or has been known to say, seems like the right thing.” That is, he notes, unless something else is required on that occasion, and for many “that’s clearly the problem here.” He references the memes that have sprung up mocking the use of these words after deadly incidents, like [an episode](https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/9/14/16296632/netflix-bojack-horseman-is-a-comedy) of the Netflix show _BoJack Horseman_ and an [online game](https://www.thoughtsandprayersthegame.com/) in which players are sardonically invited to use “thoughts and prayers” to try and stop mass shootings. “Their point is that, given our epidemic,” Hargraves says, “‘thoughts and prayers’ do not avail at all.” Repeating the same language can even feed into the feeling that mass shootings are becoming normal and unworthy of deep, sustained attention, much less legislative action. And, while many bereaved people will accept “thoughts and prayers” with fine feeling or little feeling at all — the way they might react to sympathy cards on which senders have written nothing personal except for their names — others may feel insulted. Offering someone a cliche when their insides feel like wet rags that are being twisted and torn can send the message that their grief wasn’t worth the trouble of original, specific thought. From a politician especially, it can seem like a superficial attempt to get credit for being sympathetic rather than an attempt to truly feel what the survivors might be feeling. So where does that leave us? Should people send out “thoughts and prayers” in the wake of the next unthinkable, unspeakable happening? Of course, if they want to. It’s common for good reasons. But they should also be aware of the different ways that kind of language can cut, like a cliched double-edged sword. In the meantime, critics of the phrase “thoughts and prayers” might acknowledge they too are falling into a pattern. At this point, the offering of “thoughts and prayers” is only slightly more rote than critics lashing out at politicians for reacting that way. The response “is now itself a cliche,” says Hargraves. “It is definitely an area where need original thinking.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5016382/thoughts-and-prayers-mass-shootings-language/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5016382/thoughts-and-prayers-mass-shootings-language/"},"headline":"Why 'Thoughts and Prayers' Is a Double-Edged Sword","datePublished":"2017-11-09T19:12:25.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T11:21:46.810Z","description":"The hubbub surrounding these three words is about gun control and religion. But it's also about cliches.","url":"https://time.com/5016382/thoughts-and-prayers-mass-shootings-language/","keywords":["language","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce8f9f1bf8ff865/6988e5367cdbac5962d5ad2b/texas.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Katy Steinmetz","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/katy-steinmetz/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce8f9f1bf8ff865/6988e5367cdbac5962d5ad2b/texas.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Texas Vigil","caption":"US-CRIME-SHOOTING","creditText":"Mark Ralston—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/language/","name":"language"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5016382/thoughts-and-prayers-mass-shootings-language/","name":"Why 'Thoughts and Prayers' Is a Double-Edged Sword"}}]}] ```