<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/" -->

---
title: Barack Obama Cites 2013 Syria Decision As Most Courageous
description: Obama said not bombing Syria in 2013 following reports of Assad using chemical gas required the most courage during his presidency.
canonical: https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/
author: Alana Abramson
article:opinion: false
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2017-05-17T15:47:26.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-10-08T09:02:54.639Z
article:section: Politics
og:title: Barack Obama Says His Most 'Courageous' Decision Was Not Bombing Syria
og:description: "99 percent of huge chemical weapons stockpiled were removed."
og:url: https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd18e057934d31c79/6988cc860a4a2208c59ce16a/barack-obama-food-security.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: Barack Obama Receives Kennedy Profile In Courage Award
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Barack Obama Says His Most 'Courageous' Decision Was Not Bombing Syria
twitter:description: "99 percent of huge chemical weapons stockpiled were removed."
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd18e057934d31c79/6988cc860a4a2208c59ce16a/barack-obama-food-security.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd18e057934d31c79/6988cc860a4a2208c59ce16a/barack-obama-food-security.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Barack Obama Says His Most 'Courageous' Decision Was Not Bombing Syria

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="168db884-9aea-4545-ac08-7e3be23f63b6" campaign="time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3" creative="time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=168db884-9aea-4545-ac08-7e3be23f63b6&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Twice a week | time.com/newsletters, September 2026 |
| Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy.

### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements

*   D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=168db884-9aea-4545-ac08-7e3be23f63b6&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=168db884-9aea-4545-ac08-7e3be23f63b6&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is TIME's politics newsletter?

D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, twice a week.

#### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email?

D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time.

#### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief?

Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief.

#### Is D.C. Brief free?

Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=168db884-9aea-4545-ac08-7e3be23f63b6&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is TIME's politics newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, twice a week.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is D.C. Brief free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/1L3rPr0z.m3u8" -->
## Video: Obama's 2013 Syria Speech in 3 Minutes

[Watch (HLS stream): Obama's 2013 Syria Speech in 3 Minutes](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/1L3rPr0z.m3u8) (2:56)

![Obama's 2013 Syria Speech in 3 Minutes](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/1L3rPr0z/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2013-09-11. Watch highlights of President Obama's address on Syria._


![Alana Abramson](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt841db4fb6fb33ac8/698a1380656a3f7bb2bda9e7/alana-abramson-2020-headshot.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1:1)

by 

[Alana Abramson](https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/)


![Alana Abramson](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt841db4fb6fb33ac8/698a1380656a3f7bb2bda9e7/alana-abramson-2020-headshot.jpg?branch=production&width=96&quality=75&auto=webp)

## Alana Abramson


May 17, 2017 3:47 PM UTC

![Alana Abramson](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt841db4fb6fb33ac8/698a1380656a3f7bb2bda9e7/alana-abramson-2020-headshot.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1:1)

by 

[Alana Abramson](https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/)


![Alana Abramson](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt841db4fb6fb33ac8/698a1380656a3f7bb2bda9e7/alana-abramson-2020-headshot.jpg?branch=production&width=96&quality=75&auto=webp)

## Alana Abramson


May 17, 2017 3:47 PM UTC

[Former President Obama](http://time.com/4772781/barack-obama-italy-politicians-you-deserve/) cited his decision not to bomb Syria in 2013 following confirmation that President Bashar al-Assad had used chemical gas as the one that required the most courage during his presidency.

“I actually think that the issue that required the most political courage was the decision not to bomb Syria after the chemical weapons use had been publicized and rather to negotiate them removing chemical weapons from Syria,” [he told Jack Schlossberg,](https://medium.com/@JFKLibrary/a-conversation-with-president-obama-on-political-courage-7c099573313e) the grandson of John F. Kennedy, the day he received the Profile in Courage award from the Kennedy Presidential Library.

Obama explained that Presidents are often praised for taking military action and criticized for refraining from it. Obama had [said in 2012 ](http://swampland.time.com/2013/04/25/six-times-the-white-house-discussed-the-syria-red-line/?iid=sr-link1)that the “red line” for military action against Syria would be the use of chemical weapons, which the [White House confirmed ](https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2013/08/30/government-assessment-syrian-government-s-use-chemical-weapons-august-21)Assad used one year later.

“It was an imperfect solution,” Obama conceded to Schlossberg. “But what we also know is that 99 percent of huge chemical weapons stockpiled were removed without us having to fire a shot.”

Obama’s remarks come a little over one month after President Trump made the decision to launch [59 Tomahawk missiles](http://time.com/4730231/us-missile-airstrike-attack-syria-donald-trump-bashar-assad/?iid=sr-link3) at a Syrian air base after a chemical attack in the country that killed over 70 people, including children.


## Transcript

No one disputes that chemical weapons were used in Syria. The world saw thousands of videos, cell phone pictures, and social media accounts from the attack. Moreover, we know the Assad regime was responsible. In the days leading up to August 21st, we know that Assad's chemical weapons personnel prepared for an attack near an area where they mix Sarin gas. They distributed gas masks to their troops. Then they fired rockets from a regime controlled area into 11 neighborhoods that the regime has been trying to wipe clear of opposition forces. We know senior figures in Assad's military machine reviewed the results of the attack.

And the regime increased their shelling of the same neighborhoods in the days that followed. We've also studied samples of blood and hair from people at the site that tested positive for sarin. If we fail to act, the Assad regime will see no reason to stop using chemical weapons. As the ban against these weapons erodes, other tyrants will have no reason to think twice about acquiring poison gas, and using them. Over time, our troops would again face the prospect of chemical warfare on the battlefield, and it could be easier for terrorist organizations to obtain these weapons. And a failure to stand against the use of chemical weapons would weaken prohibitions against other weapons of mass destruction, and embolden Assad's ally, Iran.

Which must decide whether to ignore international law by building a nuclear weapon or to take a more peaceful path. I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria. I will not pursue an open ended action like Iraq or Afghanistan. I will not pursue a prolonged air campaign like Libya or Kosovo. This would be a targeted strike to achieve a clear objective: deterring the use of chemical weapons and degrading Assad's capabilities, in part because of the credible threat of U. S. military action. As well as constructive talks that I had with President Putin, the Russian government has indicated a willingness to join with the international community in pushing Assad to give up his chemical weapons.

It's too early to tell whether this offer will succeed, and any agreement must verify that the Assad Regime keeps its commitments. But this initiative has the potential to remove the threat of chemical weapons without the use of force. I have therefore asked the leaders of Congress to postpone a vote to authorize the use of force while we pursue this diplomatic path. America's not the world's policeman, but when with modest effort and risk, we can stop children from being gassed to death and thereby make our own children safer over the long run, I believe we should act. Thank you, God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/"},"headline":"Barack Obama Says His Most 'Courageous' Decision Was Not Bombing Syria","datePublished":"2017-05-17T15:47:26.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-08T09:02:54.639Z","description":"\"99 percent of huge chemical weapons stockpiled were removed without us having to fire a shot.\"","url":"https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/","keywords":["Syria","Barack Obama","History","White House","Donald Trump","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd18e057934d31c79/6988cc860a4a2208c59ce16a/barack-obama-food-security.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alana Abramson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd18e057934d31c79/6988cc860a4a2208c59ce16a/barack-obama-food-security.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Barack Obama Receives Kennedy Profile In Courage Award","caption":"Barack Obama Receives Kennedy Profile In Courage Award","creditText":"Pool—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/syria/","name":"Syria"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/","name":"Barack Obama Says His Most 'Courageous' Decision Was Not Bombing Syria"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Obama's 2013 Syria Speech in 3 Minutes","description":"Watch highlights of President Obama's address on Syria.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/1L3rPr0z/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2013-09-11T03:59:48.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/1L3rPr0z.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/","duration":"PT2M56S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4782309/barack-obama-syria-2013-chemical-weapons/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

