--- title: Neil Gorsuch Confirmation: Democrats Ready Attack Lines description: Senate Democrats will get their chance to publicly question Neil Gorsuch this week when he faces the Judiciary Committee for his hearing. canonical: https://time.com/4705093/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-supreme-court-hearing-congress-democrats/ author: Tessa Berenson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-03-20T17:15:57.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T03:54:08.081Z article:section: Politics og:title: Watch for These 6 Democratic Lines of Attack at Neil Gorsuch's Confirmation Hearing og:description: His views on abortion, whether he agrees with Trump and his work for George W. Bush. og:url: https://time.com/4705093/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-supreme-court-hearing-congress-democrats/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd347d8a32423dd78/6988b978656a3faabcbceb6d/gorsuch1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2560 og:image:height: 1440 og:image:alt: Judge Neil Gorsuch meets with Lawmakers on the Hill og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Watch for These 6 Democratic Lines of Attack at Neil Gorsuch's Confirmation Hearing twitter:description: His views on abortion, whether he agrees with Trump and his work for George W. Bush. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd347d8a32423dd78/6988b978656a3faabcbceb6d/gorsuch1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # 6 Attack Lines Neil Gorsuch Could Face at His Supreme Court Hearings > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=d2adaee7-fd9b-42bb-ba30-90ec0ed90c9d&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=d2adaee7-fd9b-42bb-ba30-90ec0ed90c9d&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=d2adaee7-fd9b-42bb-ba30-90ec0ed90c9d&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Tessa Berenson](https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/)  ## Tessa Berenson Mar 20, 2017 5:15 PM UTC  Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Trump's nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, meets with lawmakers at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, on Feb. 1, 2017. Judge Neil Gorsuch, President Trump's nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court, meets with lawmakers at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, on Feb. 1, 2017. Samuel Corum—Anadolu Agency/Getty Images  by [Tessa Berenson](https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/)  ## Tessa Berenson Mar 20, 2017 5:15 PM UTC Senate Democrats will get their chance to publicly question [Neil Gorsuch](http://time.com/4653790/donald-trump-neil-gorsuch-supreme-court/?iid=sr-link1) this week when he faces the Judiciary Committee for his confirmation hearing. Gorsuch has been privately meeting with senators for more than a month now, in some cases even [distancing himself](http://time.com/4665259/neil-gorsuch-donald-trump-judges-supreme-court/?iid=sr-link2) from Trump behind the scenes to curry favor with wary Democrats. Democrats will now ask Gorsuch more about Trump’s rhetoric and policies, as well as dig into his own record— this time in full view of the press and the public. Here are six Democratic attack lines to watch. **1\. Split Gorsuch from Trump on substance** Democrats will likely try to put daylight between Gorsuch and Trump on policy. One issue that’s almost sure to come up is Trump’s revised travel ban, after judges in both [Hawaii](http://time.com/4703177/donald-trump-travel-ban-immigration-hawaii-judge/?iid=sr-link1) and [Maryland](http://time.com/4703399/trump-revised-travel-ban-blocked-federal-judge-maryland/?iid=sr-link2) rejected it last week. Many Democrats on the committee have slammed the ban, including Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, who [called it](https://www.durbin.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/durbin-statement-on-new-trump-travel-ban) “unconstitutional and un-American.” In his opening statement Monday Durbin said to Gorsuch, “You’re going to have your hands full with this president. He’s going to keep you busy.” The committee Democrats will ask Gorsuch about the travel ban and other recent executive actions. **2\. Split him from Trump on style** Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut already got Gorsuch to [criticize Trump](http://time.com/4664730/donald-trump-neil-gorsuch-tweet-judge-demoralizing/?iid=sr-link1) in a private meeting. Blumenthal told the press about the incident, in which Gorsuch said Trump’s attacks on a judge were”demoralizing” and “disheartening.” Blumenthal and other Democrats could try to do that again in a more public form, by asking Gorsuch whether he agrees with some of Trump’s most inflammatory statements about judges, the press, women, or other people and groups. “It is not enough to say in private that the President’s attacks on the judiciary are ‘disheartening,'” Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy said in his opening statement Monday. **3\. Challenge his views on the administrative state** Gorsuch is skeptical of a wonky decision on administrative law from the 1980s that will put him at odds with Democrats on the committee. The so-called [Chevron doctrine](http://time.com/4701114/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-hearing-chevron-doctrine/) says that when Congress passes an ambiguous law about a federal agency, that agency gets the first stab at interpreting that law, and the courts defer to the agency so long as its reading is “reasonable.” Gorsuch says this takes too much power away from the courts. With the Trump Administration pushing for [deconstruction of the administrative state](http://time.com/4700311/donald-trump-white-house-counsel-steve-bannon/?iid=sr-link1), Democrats are sure to probe Gorsuch on his view of Chevron. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar said during her opening statement that overturning Chevron would have “titanic” effects on society and create “widespread uncertainty,” and she told Gorsuch that she wants to know what he would replace it with. **4\. Paint him as pro-corporations, anti-worker** For weeks, Senate Democrats have raised concerns that Gorsuch’s judicial record puts him on the side of corporations over individuals. Wednesday, top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer (who is not on the judiciary committee) held a press conference with Blumenthal (who is), highlighting [real people ](http://time.com/4702354/neil-gorsuch-chuck-schumer-decisions/)who have been hurt by Gorsuch’s decisions. One of the people they brought up was Alphonse Maddin, who was fired from his job at TransAm Trucking in 2009 for abandoning his trailer in sub-zero temperatures when he feared for his safety. Maddin eventually won his lawsuit against TransAm, but Gorsuch dissented in the 10th Circuit, noting that while the law bars employers from firing a worker for “refusing to operate a vehicle,” Maddin in fact drove away. Multiple Democrats, including top committee Democrat California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, cited Maddin’s case specifically in their opening statements. Durbin said Monday that the freezing night Maddin spent in his truck was “not as cold as your dissent, Judge Gorsuch.” **5\. Pin him down on an abortion stance** Gorsuch has never ruled on an abortion case. But Democrats may point to other decisions he’s handed down and Trump’s past statements to try to establish whether he would try to overturn Roe v. Wade. In two recent hot-button cases that made their way to the Supreme Court, Gorsuch upheld religious liberty in legal battles over the Affordable Care Act. In both _Hobby Lobby Stores v. Sebelius_ and _Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Burwell,_ Gorsuch sided with the claimants seeking religious exemptions for paying for contraception as required under the ACA. He is also against euthanasia and assisted suicide, writing in a 2006 book on the topic, “All human beings are intrinsically valuable and the intentional taking of human life by private persons is always wrong.” People on both sides of the abortion question [see this language as similar](http://time.com/4652322/donald-trump-gorsuch-abortion/?iid=sr-link1) to what critics of abortion say. During his campaign, Trump also promised that he would only appoint pro-life justices to the Supreme Court. In her [statement](http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=9AE31B94-D840-43F2-A3A7-34EA2BE2B0D1) released the night Trump announced Gorsuch as the nominee, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the top ranking Democrat on the judiciary committee, said, “I am deeply concerned that throughout his campaign the president promised to use litmus tests when choosing his nominee. Last October, when asked about the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, then-candidate Trump said ‘That will happen automatically, in my opinion, because I am putting pro-life justices on the court.’ Then tonight, President Trump declared, ‘I am a man of my word.’ That’s exactly what I’m afraid of. Judge Gorsuch voted twice to deny contraceptive coverage to women, elevating a corporation’s religious beliefs over women’s health care.” **6\. Probe his history with the George W. Bush Administration and terror policies** A recent spate of President George W. Bush-era Justice Department and White House [documents](https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/nominations/supreme/pn55-115) involving Gorsuch and released by the Trump Administration ahead of the hearings include email correspondence from Gorsuch about Guantanamo Bay and the legality of Bush terror policies. (Gorsuch worked in the Justice Department for just about a year, from June 2005 to August 2006, [the New York _Times_ reports](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/neil-gorsuch-torture-guantanamo-bay.html?rref=collection%2Fbyline%2Fcharlie-savage&action=click&contentCollection=undefined®ion=stream&module=stream%5Funit&version=latest&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=C4DAD41EFD5F3B6535CA13A82A818B94&gwt=pay).) In November 2005, for example, Gorsuch visited Guantanamo Bay and [wrote](https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3517860-Gorsuch-DOJ-war-on-terror-docs-examples.html#document/p2/a344074) to the prison operation commander saying, “You and your colleagues have developed standards and imposed a degree of professionalism that the nation can be proud of, and being able to see first hand all that you have managed to accomplish with such a difficult and sensitive mission makes my job of helping explain and defend it before the courts all the easier.” Watch for the Democrats to ask about these documents and other national security issues. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4705093/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-supreme-court-hearing-congress-democrats/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4705093/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-supreme-court-hearing-congress-democrats/"},"headline":"6 Attack Lines Neil Gorsuch Could Face at His Supreme Court Hearings","datePublished":"2017-03-20T17:15:57.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T03:54:08.081Z","description":"Senate Democrats will get their chance to publicly question Neil Gorsuch this week when he faces the Judiciary Committee for his hearing.","url":"https://time.com/4705093/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-supreme-court-hearing-congress-democrats/","keywords":["Supreme Court","Congress","Neil Gorsuch"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd347d8a32423dd78/6988b978656a3faabcbceb6d/gorsuch1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Tessa Berenson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd347d8a32423dd78/6988b978656a3faabcbceb6d/gorsuch1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Judge Neil Gorsuch meets with Lawmakers on the Hill","caption":"Judge Neil Gorsuch meets with Lawmakers on the Hill","creditText":"Samuel Corum—Anadolu Agency/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/supreme-court/","name":"Supreme Court"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4705093/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-supreme-court-hearing-congress-democrats/","name":"6 Attack Lines Neil Gorsuch Could Face at His Supreme Court Hearings"}}]}] ```