--- title: Obamacare Repeal Would Hurt Middle America Most description: The health of rural America is failing, and a repeal of the Affordable Care Act without adequate replacement could prove disastrous. canonical: https://time.com/4638001/obamacare-repeal-donald-trump/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-01-22T16:00:43.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-07-09T08:19:43.914Z article:section: Ideas og:title: An Obamacare repeal would hit Middle America hardest og:description: Rural Americans experienced the highest rates of coverage gains through the ACA og:url: https://time.com/4638001/obamacare-repeal-donald-trump/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta8212f71751285f3/6988b563cf40a850dec460d0/170112_obamacare.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2100 og:image:height: 1181 og:image:alt: 170112_obamacare og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: An Obamacare repeal would hit Middle America hardest twitter:description: Rural Americans experienced the highest rates of coverage gains through the ACA twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta8212f71751285f3/6988b563cf40a850dec460d0/170112_obamacare.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # An Obamacare Repeal Would Hit Middle America Hardest > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=163efeaa-f66d-41cb-afd6-ef5df6f3ee7d&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=163efeaa-f66d-41cb-afd6-ef5df6f3ee7d&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=163efeaa-f66d-41cb-afd6-ef5df6f3ee7d&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Margaret Greenwood-Ericksen, University of Michigan Medical School](https://time.com/author/margaret-greenwood-ericksen/) and [Mahshid Abir, University of Michigan / The Conversation](https://time.com/author/mahshid-abir/) Jan 22, 2017 4:00 PM UTC  Pedro Rojas holds a sign directing people to an insurance company where they can sign up for the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, before the February 15th deadline on February 5, 2015 in Miami, Florida. Pedro Rojas holds a sign directing people to an insurance company where they can sign up for the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, before the February 15th deadline on February 5, 2015 in Miami, Florida. Joe Raedle/Getty Images by [Margaret Greenwood-Ericksen, University of Michigan Medical School](https://time.com/author/margaret-greenwood-ericksen/) and [Mahshid Abir, University of Michigan / The Conversation](https://time.com/author/mahshid-abir/) Jan 22, 2017 4:00 PM UTC The health of rural America is failing, and a repeal of the [Affordable Care Act](http://time.com/money/4633181/obamacare-repeal-what-now/) (ACA) without adequate [replacement](http://time.com/4639704/john-kasich-obamacare/) could prove [disastrous](http://time.com/4639119/obamacare-popularity-rises-poll/). A December 2016 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that for the first time in 20 years, [life expectancy](https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db267.htm) in the United States has declined, particularly in [small cities and rural areas](http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2016/04/10/a-new-divide-in-american-death/?hpid=hp%5Fno-name%5Fwhitedeath-underdisplay%5F1%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&tid=a%5Finl), where people are dying at much higher rates. This shocking trend is driven in part by increasing mortality rates for [white, working-class](http://www.pnas.org/content/112/49/15078.full.pdf) Americans, many of whom live in rural America. There is no better indicator of well-being than life expectancy, and reversals like this are unusual for [wealthy nations](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4802655/) where successive generations increase in longevity. This has remained true for vulnerable, minority populations in America, as [blacks and Hispanics](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/06/03/big-gains-for-black-hispanic-longevity-in-u-s-since-2000-white-gains-much-smaller/?utm%5Fterm=.96fcf6285250) continue to make gains in life expectancy even while experiencing significant health disparities. This drop in life expectancy in rural areas is linked to higher rates of chronic illness, obesity, drug overdose, alcoholism, mental illness and suicide. Death rates are most notable for rural white women, who are now much more likely than their grandmothers to suffer from [obesity, smoking and alcoholism](http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2015/11/10/to-understand-climbing-death-rates-among-whites-look-to-women-of-childbearing-age/). Rising rates of opioid addiction have resulted in an increase in [drug dependency in newborns](http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2592302) born to rural mothers. Further, dwindling industry in these communities limits access to both employment and to health care. Taken as a whole, [Medicaid expansion](http://hrms.urban.org/quicktakes/Substantial-Gains-in-Health-Insurance-Coverage-Occurring-for-Adults-in-Both-Rural-and-Urban-Areas.html) through the ACA has resulted in critical gains toward improving rural population health by expanding insurance coverage and stabilizing rural hospitals. The repeal of Medicaid expansion and collapse of the individual insurance market, which could occur as part of repeal of the ACA, could threaten strides the country has made in advancing the health of rural America. As emergency medicine physicians, we treat patients across the spectrum of race, class, geography and socioeconomic status – and we know firsthand how devastating the loss of access to health care can be to vulnerable populations. We explain why repeal of the fundamental components of the ACA, commonly called Obamacare, will be uniquely disastrous for the health of rural populations. ### Rural health gains It is no surprise that rural Americans experienced the highest rates of [coverage gains](https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/204986/ACARuralbrief.pdf) through the ACA. They have been more likely to have had [inadequate access](https://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/rural/publications/ruralimplications.pdf) to affordable health care for years. This dramatic increase in insurance is translating into improved health for these communities. For example, in Arkansas and Kentucky, [Medicaid expansion](http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/35/1/96.abstract) resulted in fewer people skipping medications due to cost, a decline in difficulty paying medical bills and an increase in regular doctor visits for chronic illnesses. However, health care in rural areas under the ACA has also faced major challenges. Health care markets are now more integrated, focused on moving away from free-for-service and towards coordinated care and value-based payment models. [Value-based care](https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/Value-Based-Programs.html) links payment to improved population outcomes. This innovative concept has taken the form of [accountable care organizations](https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ACO/index.html?redirect=/Aco) (ACOs) — in which groups of doctors or hospitals come together to provide coordinated care to a group of patients while being reimbursed through [bundled payments](http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2014/07/02/the-payment-reform-landscape-bundled-payment/). A bundled payment is a reimbursement method for health care providers, hospitals or other care facilities in which the care provider receives payment for all services to treat a given condition. It differs from fee-for-service, which reimburses a provider for each service — that is, each visit, treatment or test that a patient might receive. Although the goal is to reduce duplication of services while providing high-quality care, these were designed with large, urban populations in mind — as they rely on a high-volume patient population. Given rural health care’s challenge of caring for aging, sicker patients in areas with low population density, these [value-based models](http://www.rupri.org/wp-content/uploads/FORHP-comments-km-DSR-PANEL-DOCUMENT%5FPRD%5FReview%5F112315.clean-4%5Fsn-3.pdf) do not translate well to rural settings. This could result in reducing payments unfairly to rural hospitals, leaving even less money for much needed technology and infrastructure upgrades. Further, many rural insurance marketplaces are facing increasing rates of insurer dropout and rising premiums due to higher-than-expected costs. This is due to rural populations being much sicker than anyone realized. For example, patients enrolled in the [insurance exchanges](http://wvmetronews.com/2016/10/26/obamacare-premiums-spike-in-west-virginia/) in West Virginia were 88 percent more likely to have heart disease, 69 percent more likely to have high blood pressure and 110 percent more likely to have kidney disease compared to nonexchange, privately insured patients. Even more critical, we are facing a rural [hospital closure](http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20150516/MAGAZINE/305169959) crisis. The cause of this is complex, but over 70 percent of the closures have occurred in states that [did not expand Medicaid](http://kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/a-look-at-rural-hospital-closures-and-implications-for-access-to-care/) — which appears to be linked to improved finances, as hospitals in expansion states have experienced less [uncompensated care](http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/35/9/1665.abstract). ### What’s to be done? To improve rural health, it is critical to maintain the expansion of Medicaid. We must find a way to expand coverage for the rest of rural America — two-thirds of [uninsured people](http://kff.org/uninsured/issue-brief/the-affordable-care-act-and-insurance-coverage-in-rural-areas/) in rural areas live in nonexpansion states. As of Jan. 1, 2017, there were 19 states that have not expanded Medicaid. The majority of these states have large rural populations, including those in the Deep South and the stack of western states south of North Dakota. One option forward for would be to encourage states to apply for special waivers, or 1115 waivers, which allow states a more flexible implementation of Medicaid expansion. For some states, this allows them to expand coverage under Medicaid in a way that is more attuned to each state’s unique demographics and values. For example, alterations range from [healthy behavior incentives](https://www.msms.org/Resources/ForPractices/TheHealthyMichiganPlan.aspx) that reduce premiums in Iowa to permitting higher [cost-sharing](http://www.in.gov/fssa/hip/2452.htm) than is otherwise allowed under federal rules for nonemergency use of emergency rooms in Indiana. We do not yet know how the debate over ACA repeal and replace will play out. Yet, we do know that some of the proposed alternatives could result in real harm to rural states — the most obvious being a repeal of Medicaid expansion. Further, block grants have been discussed as a method to control Medicaid costs. These are [grant programs](http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2016/nov/medicaid-block-grants) from the federal government that give states annual fixed amounts to spend on a specific program, but they can result in neglect of rural populations. As block grants limit the amount of money states have to spend on vulnerable populations, they may overlook [national objectives](https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/aib724/19402%5Faib72403%5F1%5F.pdf), such as caring for rural and poor communities. ### Danger ahead? An immediate repeal of Medicaid expansion and the private marketplaces without a thoughtful transition and comprehensive plan to maintain health insurance coverage will result in catastrophic consequences for rural health. It will result in a sudden decrease of the insured rates, leading to a dramatic increase in uncompensated care which will likely drive further [rural hospital closures](http://kff.org/report-section/a-look-at-rural-hospital-closures-and-implications-for-access-to-care-three-case-studies-issue-brief/.). This will result in a crisis of access to emergency care and harm rural economies, condemning rural Americans to an unbreakable cycle of poor health and poverty. American identity is steeped in a desire to protect our most vulnerable – but we need to act now to save our heartland. [_Margaret Greenwood-Ericksen_](https://theconversation.com/profiles/margaret-greenwood-ericksen-331504)_, National Clinician Scholar, Clinical Lecturer, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School,_ [_University of Michigan_](http://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-michigan-1290) _and_ [_Mahshid Abir_](https://theconversation.com/profiles/mahshid-abir-331507)_, Assistant Professor,_ [_University of Michigan_](http://theconversation.com/institutions/university-of-michigan-1290) _This article was originally published on_ [_The Conversation_](http://theconversation.com)_. Read the_ [_original article_](http://theconversation.com/rural-america-already-hurting-could-be-most-harmed-by-trumps-promise-to-repeal-obamacare-71453)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4638001/obamacare-repeal-donald-trump/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4638001/obamacare-repeal-donald-trump/"},"headline":"An Obamacare Repeal Would Hit Middle America Hardest","datePublished":"2017-01-22T16:00:43.000Z","dateModified":"2026-07-09T08:19:43.914Z","description":"Rural Americans experienced the highest rates of coverage gains through the ACA","url":"https://time.com/4638001/obamacare-repeal-donald-trump/","keywords":["Health Care","Donald Trump","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta8212f71751285f3/6988b563cf40a850dec460d0/170112_obamacare.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Margaret Greenwood-Ericksen, University of Michigan Medical School"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Mahshid Abir, University of Michigan / The Conversation"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta8212f71751285f3/6988b563cf40a850dec460d0/170112_obamacare.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"170112_obamacare","caption":"obamacare sign","creditText":"Joe Raedle/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health-care/","name":"Health Care"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4638001/obamacare-repeal-donald-trump/","name":"An Obamacare Repeal Would Hit Middle America Hardest"}}]}] ```