--- title: Paying for the Military Like the Ruby Slippers description: If the Smithsonian can raise $300,000 in a week for the ruby slippers, why can’t the Pentagon take the same approach? canonical: https://time.com/4544176/smithsonian-ruby-slippers-military/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-25T15:08:26.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:54:53.841Z article:section: Politics og:title: Paying for the Military Like the Ruby Slippers og:description: If the Smithsonian can raise money online, why not the Pentagon? og:url: https://time.com/4544176/smithsonian-ruby-slippers-military/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt10b2a3acea6258ee/6988ab68524fc0e819df9f91/ruby-boots1.png?branch=production&width=750&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: ruby-boots og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Paying for the Military Like the Ruby Slippers twitter:description: If the Smithsonian can raise money online, why not the Pentagon? twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt10b2a3acea6258ee/6988ab68524fc0e819df9f91/ruby-boots1.png?branch=production&width=750&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Paying for the Military Like the Ruby Slippers by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Oct 25, 2016 3:08 PM UTC  Smithsonian + Getty Images by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Oct 25, 2016 3:08 PM UTC If the Smithsonian can [raise](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2016/10/24/smithsonian-exceeds-300000-kickstarter-goal-to-preserve-dorothys-ruby-slippers/) $300,000 in a week for the ruby slippers Dorothy wore in _The Wizard of Oz_, why can’t the Pentagon take the same approach when it comes to raising armies to wage the nation’s wars? It may sound goofy, but it makes about as much sense as allowing the nation’s physical infrastructure to rot amid the current $3.6 trillion maintenance-funding [shortfall](http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/), or [relying](https://www.nps.gov/nama/learn/news/rubenstein-lincoln-memorial-donation.htm) on a billionaire to patch the cracks in the Washington Monument following D.C.’s 2011 earthquake. In the internet age, no need to count on tax returns to raise cash for a military. About 85% of Americans have access to a computer, far more than the roughly 55% who actually pay federal taxes. Crowd-funding apps—like [GoFundMe](https://www.gofundme.com/?pc=cf2), [Kickstarter](https://www.kickstarter.com/) (the one the Smithsonian [used](https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/smithsonian/conserve-dorothys-ruby-slippers?token=ee9ed485) to buff up those ruby slippers) and [Indiegogo](https://www.indiegogo.com/#/picks%5Ffor%5Fyou)—are popping up all over the Web. So why bother writing (how quaint!) a check (how 20th Century!) to mail in with your IRS Form 1040 every April to send off to Uncle Sam (how archaic!)? Let’s just fight the wars we think are worth fighting by going online to a place, let’s call it [WebWars.com](http://www.webwars.com/) (the domain name is available for a paltry $5,000), and deciding how much we’d like to contribute. After all, it’s not like Congress takes seriously the requirement that only it can declare war; heck, they haven’t done that since World War II. Why should hard-working Americans fork over money to fund conflicts that the nation’s lawmakers feel can be fought without their declaration? Bottom line (pun intended): if they don’t need to declare it, we don’t need to pay for it. Practically speaking, there’s not much wrong with the scheme. The Pentagon and its allies on Capitol Hill have been doing something similar since 9/11\. They have been [cramming](https://www.nationalpriorities.org/campaigns/overseas-contingency-operations/) extra dollars into the military’s budget to wage the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, even though much of that spending has nothing to do with the conflicts. They’re doing this because such purported war-fighting funds aren’t subject to the budget ceilings passed by Congress in 2011\. It has become Washington’s favorite way of lifting that ceiling while complying (_wink-wink_) with the law that set the ceiling. And in a grim reminder of war’s real cost, associates of those killed in action have begun setting up crowdsourcing web [pages](https://www.gofundme.com/finan-family-2vjbwtw) for their families. Of course, if you want to get technical, there are a host of problems associated with the idea. First of all, it takes time to build up a military. It can’t be turned on like a light, to be used only when it’s needed. Even when it’s stored away safely on the national shelf, it needs to be ready to go at a moment’s notice. So maybe there could be sustaining memberships, for those Americans who believe a strong defense is worth investing in and paying for. Kind of like supporting an orphan overseas with a monthly contribution. So how much would that cost you? For simplicity’s, let’s assume the $573 billion the nation is spending this year on defense boils down to the 2.6 million combat boots worn by the 1.3 million members of the active-duty military. That works out to about $440,000 per soldier, sailor, airman and Marine. Sure, that’s a hefty 47% premium over the ruby slippers. But if you assume the boots last for two years, they’re a steal at $220,000 a pair. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4544176/smithsonian-ruby-slippers-military/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4544176/smithsonian-ruby-slippers-military/"},"headline":"Paying for the Military Like the Ruby Slippers","datePublished":"2016-10-25T15:08:26.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:54:53.841Z","description":"If crowdfunding can work for the Smithsonian, why not the Pentagon?","url":"https://time.com/4544176/smithsonian-ruby-slippers-military/","keywords":["Military","Smithsonian"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt10b2a3acea6258ee/6988ab68524fc0e819df9f91/ruby-boots1.png?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt10b2a3acea6258ee/6988ab68524fc0e819df9f91/ruby-boots1.png?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"ruby-boots","caption":"","creditText":"Smithsonian + Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/military/","name":"Military"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4544176/smithsonian-ruby-slippers-military/","name":"Paying for the Military Like the Ruby Slippers"}}]}] ```