--- title: Hillary Clinton Has the Best Solution to Homegrown Terrorism description: 'Progress depends upon engaging with central figures within Muslim communities' canonical: https://time.com/4506574/hillary-clinton-national-security/ author: Daniel Benjamin article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-09-24T13:04:28.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-30T12:15:10.831Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Hillary Clinton Has the Best Solution to Homegrown Terrorism og:description: 'Progress depends upon engaging with central figures within Muslim communities' og:url: https://time.com/4506574/hillary-clinton-national-security/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt09f1659a8092b061/6988a75bf887dc89ede978a1/clinton9.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at Frontline Outreach and Youth Center in Orlando, Fla., on Sept. 21, 2016. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Hillary Clinton Has the Best Solution to Homegrown Terrorism twitter:description: 'Progress depends upon engaging with central figures within Muslim communities' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt09f1659a8092b061/6988a75bf887dc89ede978a1/clinton9.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Hillary Clinton Has the Best Solution to Homegrown Terrorism > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=51b24bb3-2355-4123-bbd7-85dd0b9b2c37&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=51b24bb3-2355-4123-bbd7-85dd0b9b2c37&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=51b24bb3-2355-4123-bbd7-85dd0b9b2c37&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=51b24bb3-2355-4123-bbd7-85dd0b9b2c37&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Daniel Benjamin](https://time.com/author/daniel-benjamin-2/) and [Eric Rosand](https://time.com/author/eric-rosand/) Sep 24, 2016 1:04 PM UTC  Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at Frontline Outreach and Youth Center in Orlando, Fla., on Sept. 21, 2016. Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at Frontline Outreach and Youth Center in Orlando, Fla., on Sept. 21, 2016. Justin Sullivan—Getty Images by [Daniel Benjamin](https://time.com/author/daniel-benjamin-2/) and [Eric Rosand](https://time.com/author/eric-rosand/) Sep 24, 2016 1:04 PM UTC The recent terrorist [attacks](http://time.com/4499626/new-york-new-jersey-bombing-sites/) in New York, New Jersey and Minnesota have underscored the challenges we face in dealing with homegrown terrorism, and some have argued that neither candidate for president has a [solution](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/21/us/politics/bombing-case-points-to-gaps-in-donald-trumps-and-hillary-clintons-antiterrorism-plans.html). This is untrue: Hillary Clinton has repeatedly set forward policy innovations that should reduce the likelihood of the kind of attacks we have experienced in the U.S. American [citizens](http://www.ibtimes.com/terrorism-attacks-911-have-involved-us-citizens-not-immigrants-despite-gop-debate-2228202) and permanent legal residents—not cadres sent from abroad—have been responsible for every fatality in jihadist [attacks](http://time.com/4489405/americans-fear-of-foreign-terrorists/) since 9/11 in the U.S. The key to reducing the incidence of such events is to create a more layered set of defenses by working with communities. Our communities, which are targeted by terrorists for recruitment and are where radicalization occurs, are our first, last and best defense against them. They can serve as agents of prevention before individuals are mobilized to violence. Currently, we rely on law enforcement to stop jihadist violence, and federal, state and local authorities have, year in and year out, done an extraordinary job. The quick capture of [Ahmad Khan Rahmani](http://time.com/4499144/new-york-bombing-suspect-ahmad-khan-rahami/), the suspected New York and New Jersey bomber, being a case in point. Decisive action like that tells other would-be terrorists that they can’t evade arrest, thus increasing deterrence. But the fact that Rahmani, like Omar Mateen, the Orlando shooter, had been a subject of interest for law enforcement and then dropped off the screen, suggests that the FBI may need more personnel and resources to keep an eye on some individuals. Secretary Clinton has proposed an “intel surge,” and clearly manpower and money for the bureau makes sense as part of that effort. But looking more broadly, the consequence of our reliance on law enforcement means that we focus on those who have already made a commitment to carry out violence. To increase our security, we must be able to intervene before individuals take that step—before their radicalization is complete. This insight is at the heart of Clinton’s plan for stopping terrorist violence at home. As she [put it](http://time.com/4367046/orlando-shooting-hillary-clinton-transcript/) earlier this year: “Millions of peace-loving Muslims live, work, and raise their families across America. They are the most likely to recognize the insidious effects of radicalization before it’s too late, and the best positioned to help us block it. We should be intensifying contacts in those communities, not scapegoating or isolating them.” Progress depends upon engaging with central figures within Muslim communities: “parents, teachers, imams, mental health professionals, and others \[who\] recognize signs of radicalization in young people and work with law enforcement to intervene before it’s too late,” as Clinton put it in remarks after [Mateen](http://time.com/4368674/orlando-shooting-omar-mateen-2/) killed 49 people in Orlando, Fla. Her approach envisions empowering local communities to ensure they have the training and skills to identify signs that may indicate radicalization. There may not always be such signs—no one seems to have had an inkling of the plans of the San Bernardino, Calif., killers. But in both the cases of Rahami and [Dahir Ahmed Adan](http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/dahir-ahmed-adan-named-police-st-cloud-minnesota-stabbing-suspect-n651061), the man accused of stabbing 10 people in Minnesota, there were indications of trouble. These community members also need encouragement and flexible resources from the government and the private sector to play this role and to develop “off-ramp” programs for those at risk or who have begun to embrace terrorist propaganda but have not committed a crime. Professionals, leaders and families in the community need guidance on how to engage personally with these individuals. And while they must warn the authorities if they believe an attack is imminent, they also need space in which they can speak and intervene with individuals who may be turning to extremism without fear of immediate and heavy law enforcement action. An effective intervention program would bring together mental health professionals, social workers, religious leaders, community partners, technology companies and school officials to develop a strategy for reversing an individual’s radicalization process. Each strategy should be individually tailored, since the combination of factors driving radicalization can vary widely, and each strategy should be embedded within existing community-led and supported platforms. Although a large number of would-be terrorists have been stopped because of tips from within Muslim communities, concern—especially on the part of families—that their family members will be headed to jail, may prevent them from contacting the authorities. Indeed, that could well have been the reason Mohammad Rahami [recanted](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/21/nyregion/ahmad-khan-rahami-suspect.html?%5Fr=0) his claim to the FBI that his son Ahmad was a terrorist. And some may object that taking a social work and therapeutic approach to potential terrorists is too soft an approach. But such efforts have shown sustained value in similar efforts to deal with the far more pervasive phenomenon of gangs and gang violence. In Europe, where the level of radicalization is considerably higher, innovation in community-led counter-radicalization is well under way, and programs in Denmark and The Netherlands have proven effective in reducing the number violent extremists. In the U.S., a few community-level programs have emerged in places such as Boston, Cook County, Illinois, Montgomery County Maryland, Los Angeles and Minneapolis—Clinton has held public events with program leaders of the last two. This year the White House [established](http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/290046-communities-first-a-national-prevention-network-to) a Department of Homeland Security (DHS)-led task force to coordinate federal efforts and DHS just announced the first federal grant program, for only $10 million. The funding is a step in the right direction. By itself, however, it is unlikely to catalyze the kind of broad-based community-led efforts—and attract the expertise from outside government—that are needed. That’s why Clinton has drawn attention to these small-scale, pilot programs and repeatedly underscored her determination to expand this work if elected while being mindful of the need to empower and not stigmatize communities in the process. By contrast, Donald Trump’s policy prescriptions—if that isn’t over-dignifying them—are a roadmap to greater violence. His statements about targeting terrorists’ families and employing torture are guaranteed to heighten the sense of insecurity and isolation that, as many have reported, are gripping Muslim communities that are beleaguered by xenophobia and multiplying hate crimes. His many shifting proposals to stop Muslims from abroad from visiting or emigrating to the U.S. won’t work because those who are committing violence are already here; his proposals also seem calculated to make Muslim Americans feel cut off from their families and societies of origin. Trump’s various approaches constitute a sure-fire recipe for greater radicalization and more violence. ISIS recognizes this, which is why it is [eager](http://time.com/4480945/isis-donald-trump/) for Trump to be president. No one has a foolproof way of ending all terrorist violence—and no one will so long as human nature remains infinitely unpredictable and recalcitrant. But one candidate, Hillary Clinton, has been advocating the best approach available to reduce homegrown terror. To ignore that—and to support her opponent—is to roll the dice with American security at home. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4506574/hillary-clinton-national-security/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4506574/hillary-clinton-national-security/"},"headline":"Hillary Clinton Has the Best Solution to Homegrown Terrorism","datePublished":"2016-09-24T13:04:28.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-30T12:15:10.831Z","description":"'Progress depends upon engaging with central figures within Muslim communities'","url":"https://time.com/4506574/hillary-clinton-national-security/","keywords":["National Security"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt09f1659a8092b061/6988a75bf887dc89ede978a1/clinton9.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Daniel Benjamin","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/daniel-benjamin-2/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Eric Rosand","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/eric-rosand/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt09f1659a8092b061/6988a75bf887dc89ede978a1/clinton9.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at Frontline Outreach and Youth Center in Orlando, Fla., on Sept. 21, 2016.","caption":"Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks during a campaign event at Frontline Outreach and Youth Center in Orlando, Fla., on Sept. 21, 2016.","creditText":"Justin Sullivan—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/national-security/","name":"National Security"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4506574/hillary-clinton-national-security/","name":"Hillary Clinton Has the Best Solution to Homegrown Terrorism"}}]}] ```