--- title: House Sit-In: Decades of Debate Over Video in Congress description: Most of the coverage of the sit-in staged by House Democrats this week came directly from representatives, due to rules about video there canonical: https://time.com/4380526/house-democrat-sit-in-video-broadcast-history/ author: Katie Reilly article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-06-23T22:55:37.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T22:49:16.399Z article:section: History og:title: House Sit-In Followed Decades of Debate Over Video in Congress og:description: The sit-in broadcasts represented a new strategy in a lengthy debate og:url: https://time.com/4380526/house-democrat-sit-in-video-broadcast-history/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt396dc4d9bac74bde/6988993ccf40a812e7c43c0b/c-span-house-broadcast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4000 og:image:height: 2250 og:image:alt: House Republicans Leave Town As Democrats Extend Gun Sit-In og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: House Sit-In Followed Decades of Debate Over Video in Congress twitter:description: The sit-in broadcasts represented a new strategy in a lengthy debate twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt396dc4d9bac74bde/6988993ccf40a812e7c43c0b/c-span-house-broadcast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # House Sit-In Followed Decades of Debate Over Video in Congress > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=b2fb13da-15fc-4a6c-8740-499f41e73e1c&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=b2fb13da-15fc-4a6c-8740-499f41e73e1c&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=b2fb13da-15fc-4a6c-8740-499f41e73e1c&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription.  by [Katie Reilly](https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/)  ## Katie Reilly Jun 23, 2016 10:55 PM UTC  Facebook Live video of Rep. Ann McLane Kuster, a Democrat from New Hampshire, is broadcast on C-SPAN during a House Democratic sit-in on gun legislation in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 23. Facebook Live video of Rep. Ann McLane Kuster, a Democrat from New Hampshire, is broadcast on C-SPAN during a House Democratic sit-in on gun legislation in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 23. Andrew Harrer—Bloomberg/Getty Images  by [Katie Reilly](https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/)  ## Katie Reilly Jun 23, 2016 10:55 PM UTC Most of the broadcast coverage of the [sit-in staged by House Democrats](http://time.com/4380254/house-sit-in-ends-gun-control-democrats/) this Wednesday and Thursday came directly from representatives themselves, many of whom [used social media](http://time.com/4380152/watch-democratic-reps-house-sit-in/) to post photos and livestream video of their push for gun legislation. Those livestreams even ended up on C-SPAN, the network that has for decades broadcasted political proceedings, after House Republicans cut the camera feed typically used by the network. Although that move sparked criticism from many who wanted to watch the sit-in, it fell within House rules—and those rules have been used by Democrats and Republicans alike. The way it works is that the Speaker of the House—currently Republican Paul Ryan—controls the system for broadcasting House floor proceedings. C-SPAN Communications Director Howard Mortman told TIME that over the years, House and Senate leaders in both parties have repeatedly denied [the network’s requests](http://www.c-span.org/about/letters/) to use its own cameras in the chambers. [House rules](http://clerk.house.gov/legislative/house-rules.pdf) also prevent people on the floor from taking pictures, recording video or using “a mobile electronic device that impairs decorum.” House Democrats technically broke those rules during the sit-in. “What you’re seeing today is brand new. It’s kind of unprecedented to show this sustained amount of video basically nonstop from when \[the sit-in\] began,” Mortman said on Thursday. “We’ve been showing video from the floor in ways that were unimaginable even months ago.” The diversity of video offered by social-media tools like Facebook Live and Periscope compensated, he added, for any deficit in video quality. There’s perhaps no better way to see the role those tools can play than by comparing this week’s events to those of 2008, when House Republicans staged a similar protest to push for a vote on offshore oil drilling after Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi adjourned the House and cut the broadcast feed. That protest preceded the advancements in social media that aided Democrats this week. Back then, Republican Rep. John Culberson, from Texas, shared information about the developing protest on Twitter, and C-SPAN [broadcast the more limited video streamed by Culberson](http://www.c-span.org/video/?280215-1/republican-house-floor-protest-video) through Qik, which has since shut down. [_Get your history fix in one place: sign up for the weekly TIME History newsletter_](http://time.com/newsletter) “Here is a powerful use of social media – when they turn off the mike we can still communicate,” Culberson [posted on Twitter](https://twitter.com/johnculberson/status/874828040) during the 2008 protest, hailing the moment as “the dawn of real time democracy through real time representatives.” “Retweet these messages – these are the only words being broadcast from the House floor today,” he [said](https://twitter.com/johnculberson/status/874869492). Alas, Twitter—founded in 2006—was still relatively new, and most of Culberson’s tweets garnered no retweets and just a handful of likes. Robert Browning, executive director of C-SPAN archives, recalled that Culberson’s video couldn’t easily be transmitted during the sessions. “The technology was not as robust back then,” Browning said in an interview with TIME on Thursday, and the lack of video hampered the story’s ability to spread. House Republicans, he added, relied instead on press conferences given after the fact. But 2008 was hardly the beginning of the debate over video access in Congress. The issue predates C-SPAN, which began its regular live broadcasts of the House floor on March 19, 1979\. The first live television broadcast of a congressional proceeding took place on Jan. 3, 1947 for the opening of the 80th Congress and was used only occasionally thereafter. Cameras were later banned from regular floor sessions and committee hearings in 1952, after debates over which floor proceedings should be broadcast, who would have the authority to make that decision and who would control the cameras. According to the [House Office of the Historian](http://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/Electronic-Technology/Television/), there was also concern about how “working under the gaze of the cameras” might impact representatives. (Browning has another theory: “They didn’t want members to be seen not paying attention, reading newspapers.”) Like so much else in America, the rules about video were changed by Watergate. The House authorized broadcast coverage of floor debates ahead of potential impeachment proceedings against President Richard Nixon. In the wave of pro-transparency feeling that followed, some representatives advocated for live coverage as something that would benefit democracy. But, even as video became more accepted, questions remained about what its purpose would be. Some leaders in Congress have argued that the official cameras are only there to provide a video record of what is said while the House is in session, Browning said. That would mean that any additional political drama—including spontaneous sit-ins—was never intended to be included. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4380526/house-democrat-sit-in-video-broadcast-history/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4380526/house-democrat-sit-in-video-broadcast-history/"},"headline":"House Sit-In Followed Decades of Debate Over Video in Congress","datePublished":"2016-06-23T22:55:37.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T22:49:16.399Z","description":"The sit-in broadcasts represented a new strategy in a lengthy debate","url":"https://time.com/4380526/house-democrat-sit-in-video-broadcast-history/","keywords":["politics","Congress"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt396dc4d9bac74bde/6988993ccf40a812e7c43c0b/c-span-house-broadcast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Katie Reilly","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt396dc4d9bac74bde/6988993ccf40a812e7c43c0b/c-span-house-broadcast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"House Republicans Leave Town As Democrats Extend Gun Sit-In","caption":"House Republicans Leave Town As Democrats Extend Gun Sit-In","creditText":"Andrew Harrer—Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4380526/house-democrat-sit-in-video-broadcast-history/","name":"House Sit-In Followed Decades of Debate Over Video in Congress"}}]}] ```