--- title: Why Hillary Clinton's Warmth Should Not Matter description: Male candidates don’t have the same pressure to be likable canonical: https://time.com/4202747/hillary-clinton-likability/ author: Darlena Cunha article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-02-02T17:43:22.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T14:38:59.270Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why Hillary Clinton's Warmth Should Not Matter og:description: Male candidates don’t have the same pressure to be likable og:url: https://time.com/4202747/hillary-clinton-likability/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8b9c128015c6e034/69887bcc428a9e59aacd1383/hillary-clinton.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 594 og:image:height: 334 og:image:alt: Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greets supporters during her caucus night event in the Olmsted Center at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, on Feb. 1, 2016. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why Hillary Clinton's Warmth Should Not Matter twitter:description: Male candidates don’t have the same pressure to be likable twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8b9c128015c6e034/69887bcc428a9e59aacd1383/hillary-clinton.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why Hillary Clinton's Warmth Should Not Matter > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=217a6789-6327-4f6b-a6b5-1768bf91005c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=217a6789-6327-4f6b-a6b5-1768bf91005c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=217a6789-6327-4f6b-a6b5-1768bf91005c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Darlena Cunha](https://time.com/author/darlena-cunha/) ## Darlena Cunha Feb 2, 2016 5:43 PM UTC  Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greets supporters during her caucus night event in the Olmsted Center at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, on Feb. 1, 2016. Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greets supporters during her caucus night event in the Olmsted Center at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, on Feb. 1, 2016.Justin Sullivan—Getty Images by [Darlena Cunha](https://time.com/author/darlena-cunha/) ## Darlena Cunha Feb 2, 2016 5:43 PM UTC Hillary Clinton is not a hugger. We non-huggers can smell our own. I mean, yes, [she does give out hugs](https://www.google.com/search?q=hillary+clinton+hugs&espv=2&biw=1050&bih=691&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj5usKBitXKAhVB32MKHaP0C-sQsAQIGw&dpr=1), but hugging does not seem to be her top priority. She seems to save her hug reservoir for when the moment is right—when a hug is necessary, like [when a fifth grader asked her a question about bullying](http://www.tri-cityherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article57478748.html) last month. And when it’s not, like when she’s in the[ middle of a rally](http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wow-hillary-clinton-refuses-to-give-a-supporter-a-hug/), she’s good at putting it off. Clinton doesn’t have time to be interrupted by hugs. At last week’s town hall, in trying to convince the voting public that she could get Republicans to work with her on the issues, Clinton said that Republicans liked her and that they said nice things about her—unless it was an election cycle. Then, she said with a big laugh, as president she’d give Republicans [a bear hug](http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/01/best-moments-democratic-town-hall-cnn), [whether they liked it or not](https://twitter.com/CNN/status/691833923123429376). There is a dichotomy here. When Clinton lost the nomination in 2008, [her campaign](http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/ken-walshs-washington/2015/04/13/hillary-clinton-carries-mantle-of-gender-in-2016) had been structured around her I-mean-business attitude. It didn’t work. Before she ran in 2008, a large number of Democratic insiders polled cited “[her persona](http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/07/hillary-in-2008/304044/)” as a reason she might lose the election. An anonymous Republican insider in the same survey called her “a man among boys.” It seemed her curt, manlike attitude was one of the keys to her undoing. It’s safe to say a curt, manlike attitude has never hindered any male leader. This time around, when she started her campaign, Clinton [learned from her mistake](http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/ken-walshs-washington/2015/04/13/hillary-clinton-carries-mantle-of-gender-in-2016). She very publicly embraced her role of grandmother, for instance, and underscored not only her ability to hang tough with world leaders, but also her ability to connect with women, children and families. She has consistently reminded the public that family is a high priority for her. She’s all new—warm and fuzzy and offering bear hugs. And it’s awkward. Because at times, she slips back into who she is—a hard-lined, experienced, ambitious politician who has had to hold her own against men in leadership roles her entire career. Those slips make people question her authenticity. But they also bring up the question: why does Clinton have to spend so much time proving she’s likable? Bernie Sanders certainly isn’t hammered with questions about how he plans on getting Republicans to work with him as he raises minimum wage for the working class and taxes the rich. Sanders gets to stay on message without having to worry about his likability factor. And Donald Trump is successfully running an entire campaign on [mean-spirited attacks](http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/10/donald-trump-targets-bernie-sanders-with-isis-themed-attack-ad), [bullying](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/16/bullying-experts-trump-is-an-eighth-grade-girl.html) and [name-calling](http://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/slideshow/2278/donald-trump-insults-11-celebs-with-downright-mean-tweets/trump-s-meanest-tweets). No one has asked the Donald whether or not Democrats say nice things about him. Meanwhile, Clinton continues to be beleaguered by the idea that people just don’t like her. Because as a successful, ambitious woman in politics, the public just doesn’t know what to make of her. As a woman, society expects she should have certain tenets gifted her by her gender. She should be a kindly grandmother type, a welcoming and warm presence, a caretaker, a giver—a hugger. As a woman politician, Clinton is required to have triple the knowledge and double the finesse of the other candidates on the floor, just in order to have people pay attention. Even [President Barack Obama acknowledged as much last week](http://www.vox.com/2016/1/25/10829662/obama-on-clinton-media), saying in 2008 the media was harder on Clinton’s campaign than on his. She’s had to prove hundreds of times that she can face the nation calmly when under stress, like when [her email trail is sifted over by thousands of eyes](http://www.npr.org/2016/01/29/464936930/6-takeaways-from-the-new-hillary-clinton-emails). She had to prove that she can make decisions quickly and rationally under pressure, such as her Benghazi decisions, for which she waded through [hour upon hour of hearings](http://www.slate.com/articles/news%5Fand%5Fpolitics/politics/2015/10/hillary%5Fclinton%5Fwon%5Fthe%5Fbenghazi%5Fhearing.html), and kept her cool. To the public, it seems to be given that Sanders or Trump will have the ability to lead. They will have to prove us wrong by messing up, whereas Clinton has to prove us wrong by doing the job well. So often we hear that Clinton is [too cold](http://buquad.com/2015/11/05/millennials-feel-the-bern-but-is-clinton-too-cold/), [too calculating](https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/04/20/hillary-clinton-losing-the-authenticity-primary/), [too ambitious](https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/are-we-born-racist/201010/is-hillary-clinton-pathologically-ambitious). She’ll [say anything](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wE2FkCN-NfU) it takes to get elected. She’s only in politics for her own [personal gain](http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/congress/hillary-clinton-testimony-at-house-benghazi-panel/committee-republican-accuses-hillary-clinton-of-using-libya-to-benefit-herself). Still, we could say that about any number of male candidates and male elected officials. Clinton’s [every facial expression is analyzed](http://twitchy.com/2015/10/22/shameful-whats-up-with-hillary-clintons-obama-face-at-benghazi-hearing-photos/)—[did she cry, and if so, was it fakery](http://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clintons-emotional-moment-87141)? [Her laugh is called a cackle](http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/10/14/media-return-to-deriding-hillary-clintons-laugh/206136), her silence taken as condescension. Something about Clinton makes many voters uneasy, but they can’t quite place their fingers on what it is. Because what it is is that she’s a woman—a woman who has been steadfastly plodding toward the presidency for decades. It doesn’t matter whether Hillary Clinton is a hugger or not. What matters is that she is the only one of out of more than a dozen presidential hopefuls who has to claim that she is. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4202747/hillary-clinton-likability/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4202747/hillary-clinton-likability/"},"headline":"Why Hillary Clinton's Warmth Should Not Matter","datePublished":"2016-02-02T17:43:22.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T14:38:59.270Z","description":"Male candidates don’t have the same pressure to be likable","url":"https://time.com/4202747/hillary-clinton-likability/","keywords":["Hillary Clinton","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8b9c128015c6e034/69887bcc428a9e59aacd1383/hillary-clinton.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Darlena Cunha","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/darlena-cunha/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8b9c128015c6e034/69887bcc428a9e59aacd1383/hillary-clinton.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greets supporters during her caucus night event in the Olmsted Center at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, on Feb. 1, 2016.","caption":"Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton greets supporters during her caucus night event in the Olmsted Center at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, on Feb. 1, 2016.","creditText":"Justin Sullivan—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4202747/hillary-clinton-likability/","name":"Why Hillary Clinton's Warmth Should Not Matter"}}]}] ```