A judge in Alabama is facing backlash for telling offenders who owed the court money they could donate blood if they didn’t have the funds—or face jail time.
According to a report by the New York Times, Judge Marvin Wiggins told offenders, “if you don’t have any money, go out there and give blood and bring in a receipt indicating you gave blood.” The offenders were to be given a $100 voucher that would go toward their fines and fees for misdemeanor and traffic crimes. Many were uncomfortable with the request, with some offenders telling the Times they felt like they had no choice in the matter. Some lawyers have questioned the constitutionality of it all.
On Monday, the Southern Poverty Law Center reportedly filed an ethics complaint against the judge, who they say violated offenders “bodily integrity.” The judge would not comment to the Times, but the blood collection group—who recently paid a $4 million settlement due an HIV tainted blood transfusion—said it quarantined and tested all of the blood and later threw a great deal of it away.
- How to Help Victims of the Texas School Shooting
- TIME's 100 Most Influential People of 2022
- What the Buffalo Tragedy Has to Do With the Effort to Overturn Roe
- Column: The U.S. Failed Miserably on COVID-19. Canada Shows It Didn't Have to Be That Way
- N.Y. Will Soon Require Businesses to Post Salaries in Job Listings. Here's What Happened When Colorado Did It
- The 46 Most Anticipated Movies of Summer 2022
- ‘We Are in a Moment of Reckoning.’ Amanda Nguyen on Taking the Fight for Sexual Violence Survivors to the U.N.