--- title: Russian bombers buzzing U.S. unlikely to carry nukes description: But Moscow’s growing assertiveness concerns U.S. military canonical: https://time.com/3970402/russian-bombers-buzzing-u-s-unlikely-to-carry-nukes/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-07-24T01:08:07.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-11T05:02:20.150Z article:section: Politics og:title: Russian bombers buzzing U.S. unlikely to carry nukes og:description: But Moscow’s growing assertiveness concerns U.S. military og:url: https://time.com/3970402/russian-bombers-buzzing-u-s-unlikely-to-carry-nukes/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a0bbe9405229839/69885c3f524fc01cc8df3b81/gettyimages-472217294.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3985 og:image:height: 2242 og:image:alt: RUSSIA-HISTORY-VICTORY-DAY-WWII og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Russian bombers buzzing U.S. unlikely to carry nukes twitter:description: But Moscow’s growing assertiveness concerns U.S. military twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a0bbe9405229839/69885c3f524fc01cc8df3b81/gettyimages-472217294.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Russian Bombers Buzzing U.S. Unlikely to Carry Nukes > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d286f87b-e021-4f2b-8da2-bdd517fdf12c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d286f87b-e021-4f2b-8da2-bdd517fdf12c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=d286f87b-e021-4f2b-8da2-bdd517fdf12c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d286f87b-e021-4f2b-8da2-bdd517fdf12c&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jul 24, 2015 1:08 AM UTC  A trio of Tu-95 bombers flies over the Kremlin in May. A trio of Tu-95 bombers flies over the Kremlin in May. VASILY MAXIMOV / AFP / Getty Images by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jul 24, 2015 1:08 AM UTC The bad news for Americans old enough to remember Cold War shivers is that Soviet-era Tu-95 Bear bombers recently showed up off the U.S. coast. The good news, for Americans, is that the 1950s-era Russian air force turboprop airplanes keep crashing. And that combination, a former Air Force general says, makes it unlikely that the Russian bombers are carrying any nuclear weapons close to U.S. shores (the bomber would carry such weapons inside its fuselage, making it impossible for outsiders to tell if there any are aboard, Air Force officials say). “Risking the loss of a long-range bomber like a Tu-95 with a nuclear weapon on board is a pretty big risk,” says David Deptula, a retired three-star officer who spent 3,000 hours in fighter planes, including 400 in combat. “It would be very imprudent to be carrying a nuclear weapons on board a flight like that.” A pair of Russian pilots died July 14 when their Tu-95 crashed in Russia’s Far East; a second Tu-95 ran off a Russian runway June 8 following an engine fire, injuring several crew members. Russia has been averaging about five such flights annually over the past five years, the North American Aerospace Defense Command reports (although it spiked to 10 last year). “This is nothing new,” NORAD’s Michael Kucharek says. Each time the Russian bombers approach, the joint U.S.-Canadian force dispatches interceptors to eyeball them. “We go up and visually identify the aircraft, and let them know that we are there,’ Kucharek says. “They see us and we see them.” “I don’t know what to make of it,” Merrill “Tony” McPeak, retired general and Air Force chief of staff, says of the Russian fly-bys. “The training value—polishing skills in navigation, aerial refueling, et cetera—can be achieved flying over Russian territory.” Deptula says the flights are Russian President Vladimir Putin’s way of asserting Russian might. “He’s showing they still have a way to project power when and where they want to,” Deptula says. “It reinforces the fact that they do have a capability to project power that not many nations do.” Russia’s actions in the skies, along with those in Ukraine and Crimea, have the U.S. military brass increasingly concerned. On Thursday, Lieut. General Robert Neller, tapped to be the next commandant of the Marine Corps, said he views Russia as the nation that poses the biggest threat to the U.S. “Their actions, and the fact that they have strategic forces, make them the greatest potential threat,” Neller said. He was echoing the views of General Mark Milley, soon to be the Army chief of staff, and Marine General Joseph Dunford, soon to become chairman of the Joint Chiefs. “If you want to talk about a nation that could pose an existential threat to the United States, I’d have to point to Russia,” Dunford said at his confirmation hearing July 9\. “If you look at their behavior, it’s nothing short of alarming.” The latest Russian flight took place July 4 off the central Californian coast, and a pair of U.S. F-15s were dispatched to check out the intruders. “Good morning American pilots, we are here to greet you on your Fourth of July Independence Day,” a Russian crew member aboard one of the Tu-95s radioed the Americans. The Russians conducted similar flights in 2012 and 2014. NORAD is pretty mellow about the flights, none of which has come inside the 12-mile territorial limits claimed by both the U.S. and Canada. The latest flight came within about 40 miles of the California coast. “We’ve seen these flight profiles before,”Kucharek says. “If a country has a military, they have to exercise their capabilities.” That attitude is a far cry from the Pentagon’s view of the Tu-95 during the 1980s, when the lumbering bomber was featured regularly in its annual _Soviet Military Power_ guide, a glossy publication designed to bolster support for President Ronald Reagan’s military buildup.  The Tu-95 is the backbone of Russia's bomber fleet Wojtek Laski / Getty Images “The Tu-95/Bear is the primary intercontinental air threat to the United States,” the 1983 version [said](https://time.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/smp-81.pdf). “Capable of delivering free-fall bombs or air-to-surface missiles, under optimum conditions this aircraft can cover virtually all U.S. targets on a two-way mission.” But Marine Lieut. General Neller apparently isn’t losing any sleep over the Tu-95 flights. “I don’t think they want to fight us,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday. “Right now I don’t think they want to kill Americans.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3970402/russian-bombers-buzzing-u-s-unlikely-to-carry-nukes/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3970402/russian-bombers-buzzing-u-s-unlikely-to-carry-nukes/"},"headline":"Russian Bombers Buzzing U.S. Unlikely to Carry Nukes","datePublished":"2015-07-24T01:08:07.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-11T05:02:20.150Z","description":"But Moscow’s growing assertiveness concerns U.S. military","url":"https://time.com/3970402/russian-bombers-buzzing-u-s-unlikely-to-carry-nukes/","keywords":["Military","russia","Vladimir Putin"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a0bbe9405229839/69885c3f524fc01cc8df3b81/gettyimages-472217294.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a0bbe9405229839/69885c3f524fc01cc8df3b81/gettyimages-472217294.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"RUSSIA-HISTORY-VICTORY-DAY-WWII","caption":"RUSSIA-HISTORY-VICTORY-DAY-WWII","creditText":"VASILY MAXIMOV / AFP / Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/military/","name":"Military"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3970402/russian-bombers-buzzing-u-s-unlikely-to-carry-nukes/","name":"Russian Bombers Buzzing U.S. Unlikely to Carry Nukes"}}]}] ```