--- title: Rand Paul Took On His Own Party; Now Payback Is Coming description: By outmaneuvering the Senate, he took on his own party canonical: https://time.com/3908642/payback-is-coming-to-rand-paul/ author: Michael Scherer article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-06-04T10:19:41.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T07:54:23.456Z article:section: Politics og:title: Rand Paul Took On His Own Party; Now Payback Is Coming og:description: By outmaneuvering the Senate, he took on his own party og:url: https://time.com/3908642/payback-is-coming-to-rand-paul/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Rand Paul Took On His Own Party; Now Payback Is Coming twitter:description: By outmaneuvering the Senate, he took on his own party twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Payback Is Coming to Rand Paul > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=f6ef70a0-24ee-4edb-85c4-b0cbb8199393&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=f6ef70a0-24ee-4edb-85c4-b0cbb8199393&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=f6ef70a0-24ee-4edb-85c4-b0cbb8199393&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. by [Michael Scherer](https://time.com/author/michael-scherer/) ## Michael Scherer Jun 4, 2015 10:19 AM UTC by [Michael Scherer](https://time.com/author/michael-scherer/) ## Michael Scherer Jun 4, 2015 10:19 AM UTC In a chamber of dark tailored suits, the rebel wore khakis, a cherry red tie to match his campaign color and an occasional smirk. He seized the U.S. Senate with magic words of parliamentary procedure and forced change upon the world’s most powerful intelligence agency. “I challenge the ruling of the chair,” Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said. “I request a live quorum call.” Then, simply: “I object.” With that, the clock ran out on key parts of the USA Patriot Act, the legal anchor of the nation’s Sept. 11 response. The once secret National Security Agency telephone-record vacuum made famous by Edward Snowden went silent, and a simmering debate over the identity of the GOP burst again into view. “This is what we fought the revolution over,” Paul thundered, with a warning to his party: “80% of those under 40 say we have gone too far.” It looked more like a Hollywood remake than the real thing: the Senator standing alone, speaking of tyranny and duplicity. But that is the drama baked into this scrambled 2016 field. A Republican who rose to power suggesting that Vice President Dick Cheney pushed the Iraq War to profit Halliburton now polls among the top three GOP candidates in Iowa and New Hampshire. “Defeat the Washington machine,” runs his campaign slogan, and he doesn’t just mean the federal bureaucracy. “ISIS is all over Libya,” Paul said recently about the Islamic radicals on the march, “because these same hawks in my party loved Hillary Clinton’s war in Libya.” His political thesis is generational, the vision of a son hoping to fulfill the destiny of his father Ron, a three-time presidential candidate. The old guard, Rand reasons, will be driven out of power one $5 fundraising tweet at a time, along with its vision of an America that can police the world and collect data on its citizens. “This is a Bush-era generation of Republicans who are on their last legs,” explains Representative Justin Amash, a Michigan Republican who shares the vision. “They are upset with this new generation of Republicans who are more in touch with the people.” But if there is one thing to know about national-security hawks, it is that they don’t shy from a fight. Out in Wyoming, Cheney, now 74, has planned a September assault on Paul as an “isolationist,” which he previewed from a high-country rodeo for the Wall Street Journal. After a brief truce, former Republican nominee John McCain denounced Paul as “the worst candidate that we could put forward.” And faceless front groups, working with conservative pundits, lay in wait, ready and willing to launch attacks, like the $1 million television buy that greeted Paul’s entry into the race, accusing him of partnership with President Obama for supporting negotiations with Iran. Then there are the other Republicans in the race, not one of whom spoke up to defend Paul’s stand on the Senate floor. They, too, read the polls but focus instead on those who currently claim to be GOP-primary voters, a group that now counts national security and terrorism as the top issue of 2016\. “The best test of a political marketplace is where people go,” taunts South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, a boots-on-the-ground hawk who launched his own campaign on June 1\. “And people are tripping over each other to try to kick Rand Paul.” But Paul has already won this round. With the spying authorities expired, majority leader Mitch McConnell rushed a compromise to the floor, which he warned would be “a resounding victory for those who plotted against our homeland.” By a vote of 67 to 32, the government’s secret database of American phone records ended in favor of a new system that forces phone companies to gather and store the information, which is accessible to court order by specific request. Unsatisfied with this win, Paul voted “Nay.” It was a rebel’s cry, a sign that the fight will go on. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3908642/payback-is-coming-to-rand-paul/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3908642/payback-is-coming-to-rand-paul/"},"headline":"Payback Is Coming to Rand Paul","datePublished":"2015-06-04T10:19:41.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T07:54:23.456Z","description":"By outmaneuvering the Senate, he took on his own party","url":"https://time.com/3908642/payback-is-coming-to-rand-paul/","keywords":["GOP","republicans","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Michael Scherer","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/michael-scherer/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/gop/","name":"GOP"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3908642/payback-is-coming-to-rand-paul/","name":"Payback Is Coming to Rand Paul"}}]}] ```