--- title: A Better Feminism for 2015 description: Half of successful advocacy is knowing to pick one’s battles. canonical: https://time.com/3651057/a-better-feminism-for-2015/ author: Cathy Young article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-12-31T15:57:39.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T03:12:43.843Z article:section: Ideas og:title: A Better Feminism for 2015 og:description: Half of successful advocacy is knowing to pick one’s battles. og:url: https://time.com/3651057/a-better-feminism-for-2015/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce27900fdd246c2/698777c4e20a871f19a8448c/emma-watson-united-nations.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: Emma Watson United Nations Speech og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A Better Feminism for 2015 twitter:description: Half of successful advocacy is knowing to pick one’s battles. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce27900fdd246c2/698777c4e20a871f19a8448c/emma-watson-united-nations.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A Better Feminism for 2015 by [Cathy Young](https://time.com/author/cathy-young/) ## Cathy Young Dec 31, 2014 3:57 PM UTC  Emma Watson and Ban Ki-Moon attend the launch of the HeForShe Campaign at the United Nations in September of 2014 in New York. Emma Watson and Ban Ki-Moon attend the launch of the HeForShe Campaign at the United Nations in September of 2014 in New York.Steve Sands—WireImage/Getty Images by [Cathy Young](https://time.com/author/cathy-young/) ## Cathy Young Dec 31, 2014 3:57 PM UTC Was 2014 the year feminism won the gender war, or jumped the shark? One could say it has had a pretty good year, with celebrity endorsements from the likes of Beyoncé Knowles and Emma Watson and with gender issues often dominating the news. And yet all too often, the publicity backfired. The campaign to nix the word “bossy” as a putdown of assertive girls was [criticized](http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/11/opinion/drexler-sandberg-bossy/index.html?hpt=op%5Fr1) and [mocked](http://twitchy.com/2014/03/10/stupidest-campaign-ever-facebooks-sheryl-sandberg-girl-scouts-want-to-banbossy/) not only by [conservatives](http://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/2014/03/20/chicks-right-ban-banbossy-movement/6662089/) but by [liberal](http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2014/03/10/dont-ban-bossy-sheryl-sandberg-tell-us-what-to-do-next/) and [left-wing feminists](http://nymag.com/thecut/2014/03/problem-with-the-ban-bossy-campaign.html). The #YesAllWomen Twitter hashtag created in response to Elliot Rodger’s shooting spree and his YouTube rants about female rejection elicited a [groundswell of sympathy](http://www.vox.com/2014/5/25/5749480/why-yesallwomen-is-the-most-important-thing-youll-read-today) for women’s stories of violence and sexism—but also unease from pro-feminist [men](http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/05/men%5Flabeled%5Fsexist%5Freact%5Fto%5Fyesallwomen.2.html) and [women](http://time.com/3030655/the-problem-with-feminism/) who felt all males were being unjustly shamed. A social media group called [Women Against Feminism](http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/07/30/is-this-what-an-anti-feminist-movement-looks-like/) sprung up, many of its members stressing that they were for equality but against male-bashing, gender warfare, and contempt for traditional choices. Even the movement to curb sexual assault on college campuses faltered late when [diverse](http://www.slate.com/articles/double%5Fx/doublex/2014/12/college%5Frape%5Fcampus%5Fsexual%5Fassault%5Fis%5Fa%5Fserious%5Fproblem%5Fbut%5Fthe%5Fefforts.html) [critics](http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/14/rethink-harvard-sexual-harassment-policy/HFDDiZN7nU2UwuUuWMnqbM/story.html) voiced concerns about the rights of the accused—while the unraveling of a sensational [magazine account](http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/features/a-rape-on-campus-20141119) of fraternity rape exposed the troubling zealotry of advocates for whom [believing](http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/06/no-matter-what-jackie-said-we-should-automatically-believe-rape-claims/) [rape claims](http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/08/who-is-jackie-rolling-stone-rape-story) is somewhat akin to a matter of religious faith. Do we still need feminism in 2015 and beyond—and if so, what kind? Advocacy for women’s basic rights clearly remains an urgent issue in many places around the world. Even in the United States and other advanced democracies, a movement for gender equality still has valid issues to address. Here are a few guideposts to keep such a movement from turning irrelevant, toxic, or both. Intellectual diversity is important; labels are not. Some leading feminists are so concerned with ideological purity that they [fret](http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/nov/24/when-everyone-is-a-feminist) over too many people embracing the term while failing various litmus tests. But supporting feminism, in its dictionary sense of the equality of the sexes, doesn’t bind you to any particular position on gun control, capitalism, or the environment. Even respectful dialogue with people who consider themselves pro-life feminists would benefit both sides. Conversely, if some people are pro-equality but won’t call themselves feminists because of they don’t like the word’s connotations, chastising them or explaining why they are “really” feminists is unhelpful and arrogant. Feminists, humanists, egalitarians, even (gasp!) men’s rights activists—why not work with anyone who shares one’s overall goals? A gender equality movement can only have a future if it’s a big tent. Equality should not mean that men and women must be identical in everything—it _should_ mean treating people as individuals regardless of their gender. Too often, the debate about biology and gender pits dogmatic denial of any innate behavioral or psychological differences between the sexes against broad Mars-versus-Venus stereotypes and claims that traditional sex roles are nature’s way. It’s entirely possible that even absent any gender-specific social pressures, women would be much more likely to become full-time parents, nurses, or kindergarten teachers, while men would be much more likely to become CEOs, professional athletes, or engineers. But while many differences in personality traits and cognitive patterns may be innate, they are tendencies, not absolutes. Flexibility is part of human nature, too; and, just as many feminists exaggerate the role of socialization, many conservative critics of feminism underestimate the impact of cultural biases. We can work to reduce such biases and ensure that nontraditional choices are not stigmatized or discouraged—without demanding 50-50 parity in everything. The other side of sexism must be recognized. Former Jezebel editor Lindy West has [argued](http://jezebel.com/5992479/if-i-admit-that-hating-men-is-a-thing-will-you-stop-turning-it-into-a-self-fulfilling-prophecy) that such “men’s rights” problems as unequal treatment of fathers in family courts or bias against male domestic violence victims are rooted in patriarchy and that feminism is already addressing them. Unfortunately, facts say otherwise. On these and other issues, feminist activists and commentators have tended to [side with women](https://web.archive.org/web/20140327210149/http:/www.now.org/nnt/fall-99/resolutions.html), [oppose](http://www.politicalresearch.org/2011/03/01/fathers-rights-groups-threaten-womens-gains-and-their-safety/) [measures](http://ancpr.com/2006/03/28/now-ny-speaks-on-joint-custody-bill/) to help men, and [promote](http://time.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/kelly.pdf) [women-as-victims, men-as-bad-guys](http://www.slate.com/articles/double%5Fx/doublex/2014/09/hope%5Fsolo%5Fdomestic%5Fviolence%5Fit%5Fis%5Fvery%5Fvery%5Fstupid%5Fto%5Fcompare%5Fthe%5Fsoccer.html) narratives. Such double standards need to be confronted. Despite protestations that feminism helps both sexes, West and [many](http://feministing.com/2014/09/26/feminism-shouldnt-make-men-comfortable/) [others](http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/08/laurie-penny/men-sexism) also claim that our society systematically empowers and advantages men at women’s expense. This is a gross distortion of contemporary Western reality. Biases rooted in traditional norms affect both sexes (and are perpetuated by both sexes). Women may get less support for pursuing high-paying careers; men have less leeway to choose fulfilling but lower-paying work. Women may be unfairly stereotyped as weaker; men, as more violent. While British feminist writer Laurie Penny [asserts](http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/08/laurie-penny/men-sexism) that our culture “hates women,” researchers including feminist psychologist Alice Eagly [find](http://pwq.sagepub.com/content/15/2/203) that if anything, both sexes view women more favorably than men. The perception of pervasive, one-sided male power and advantage can create a disturbing blindness to injustices toward men—even potentially life-ruining ones such as false accusations of rape. A true equality movement should address all gender-based wrongs, not create new ones. Justice knows no gender—and demands concern for both accuser and accused. There is a [real history](http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1121848?sid=21105531689273&uid=3739256&uid=3739808&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4) of legalized sexism toward women seeking recourse for sexual and domestic violence. But achieving justice in cases that hinge on conflicting and often ambiguous accounts is an extremely difficult balance. Choosing sides on the basis of gender is textbook sexism—and insisting that women are entitled to belief is a feminist version of the old-fashioned pedestal. The personal is not always political. Men behaving badly to women in personal relationships—unless such behavior has social and institutional support—is not necessarily a gender issue. Neither gender has a monopoly on insensitivity, rudeness, manipulation, dishonesty, or entitlement. What’s more, policing relationships in the name of ideology—for instance, trying to [dictate](https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/10/17/colleges-across-country-adopting-affirmative-consent-sexual-assault-policies) how people should express consent to sex—is always a bad idea. Let us by all means have a conversation on changing sexual norms; but this can be done without using coercion and penalties to enforce someone’s version of healthy interaction, or focusing almost exclusively on male mistreatment of women. A narrative is only as good as its facts. From “women earn [77 cents to a man’s dollar](http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/04/09/president-obamas-persistent-77-cent-claim-on-the-wage-gap-gets-a-new-pinocchio-rating/) for the same work” to “one in five college women are [sexually assaulted](https://twitter.com/mark%5Fj%5Fperry/status/543172905136164864) by graduation,” a number of statistics commonly used by women’s advocates have withered under scrutiny. So have some recent tales of alleged misogynist infamy, such as the [University of Virginia gang rape](http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/u-va-fraternity-to-rebut-claims-of-gang-rape-in-rolling-stone/2014/12/05/5fa5f7d2-7c91-11e4-84d4-7c896b90abdc%5Fstory.html) and cover-up or the [supposedly sexist firing](http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117868/jill-abramsons-firing-wasnt-sexist-was-still-tied-gender) of New York Times editor Jill Abramson. Too often, the [feminist](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/literally-darling/rolling-stone-uva-rape%5Fb%5F6280716.html?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067) [response](http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/12/why-we-believed-jackies-story-113365.html#.VIVzWIdFFP4) to such debunkings has [amounted](http://www.salon.com/2014/05/15/we%5Fdont%5Fneed%5Fto%5Fknow%5Fexactly%5Fwhy%5Fjill%5Fabramson%5Fgot%5Ffired%5Fto%5Fsay%5Fthat%5Fsexism%5Fwas%5Fpart%5Fof%5Fher%5Fdownfall/) to [declarations](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/15/sexual-assault-statistics%5Fn%5F6316802.html) that the big picture matters more than specific facts and figures. But the big picture had better be made up of accurate details. Campus rape certainly happens; so does workplace sexism. But addressing real problems requires solid research and reporting. We badly need more of both when it comes to gender issues. Trivial pursuit is not the path to equity. Feminism is now battling the [alleged scourge](http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/21/nyregion/MTA-targets-manspreading-on-new-york-city-subways.html?%5Fr=0) of men who take up too much space on public transit by spreading their legs? Not only is this selective male-shaming (social media users [quickly noted](https://twitter.com/TrustedTrevor/status/547256755135479809/photo/1) that female riders are guilty of different-but-equal sins), it is also a comically petty grievance that could suggests the aggrieved have no real issues. Half of successful advocacy is knowing to pick one’s battles. The biggest unfinished business of gender equality in the West is “work-life balance” and caregiving. This point was [eloquently made](http://www.newrepublic.com/article/119412/feminisms-future-debate) by Judith Shulevitz in a recent New Republic debate on feminism’s future. Whatever role discrimination may play, childbearing [has a major effect](http://www.city-journal.org/2011/21%5F3%5Fgender-gap.html) on gender disparities in career achievement. Even women who are satisfied with these trade-offs often [feel the conflict acutely](http://www.workingmother.com/special-reports/what-moms-choose-stay-home-or-work). But this tension is not just a women’s issue. In a [Pew poll](http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/03/14/modern-parenthood-roles-of-moms-and-dads-converge-as-they-balance-work-and-family/) last year, almost as many working fathers as working mothers (50% versus 56%) said it was it difficult to balance work and parenthood. Overall, twice as many fathers as mothers—46% versus 23%—felt they spent too little time with their children. Like many feminists, Shulevitz sees mainly government solutions. Others would counter that the flexibility and creativity of markets and civil society offer far better answers. But this is the kind of debate people should be having in the big tent of a true equality movement. Could such a movement get its start in 2015? In the waning days of 2014, it looks like an idea whose time has come. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3651057/a-better-feminism-for-2015/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3651057/a-better-feminism-for-2015/"},"headline":"A Better Feminism for 2015","datePublished":"2014-12-31T15:57:39.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T03:12:43.843Z","description":"Half of successful advocacy is knowing to pick one’s battles","url":"https://time.com/3651057/a-better-feminism-for-2015/","keywords":["feminism"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce27900fdd246c2/698777c4e20a871f19a8448c/emma-watson-united-nations.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Cathy Young","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/cathy-young/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdce27900fdd246c2/698777c4e20a871f19a8448c/emma-watson-united-nations.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Emma Watson United Nations Speech","caption":"Emma Watson United Nations Speech","creditText":"Steve Sands—WireImage/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/feminism/","name":"feminism"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3651057/a-better-feminism-for-2015/","name":"A Better Feminism for 2015"}}]}] ```