--- title: 25 Years After the Exxon Valdez, Oil Is Still Being Spilled description: The ecological effects of a major oil spill lingers for years—and the accidents aren't stopping canonical: https://time.com/35452/the-afterlife-of-oil-spills/ author: Bryan Walsh article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-03-24T19:00:39.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T06:55:32.021Z article:section: Science og:title: After the Exxon Valdez og:description: The long-term damage caused by oil spills og:url: https://time.com/35452/the-afterlife-of-oil-spills/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte7f3d8ef9833cd03/698686f2810bbbb7ebc90a59/140324-exxon-valdez.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1500 og:image:height: 844 og:image:alt: 140324-exxon-valdez og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: After the Exxon Valdez twitter:description: The long-term damage caused by oil spills twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte7f3d8ef9833cd03/698686f2810bbbb7ebc90a59/140324-exxon-valdez.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Afterlife of Oil Spills > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Future Proof: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Future Proof is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Making sense of the climate and energy economy. Future Proof examines the forces transforming energy and climate, and what those changes mean for business, technology, policy and the global economy. Senior correspondent Justin Worland goes beyond traditional climate coverage to connect the energy transition to the bigger decisions reshaping companies, markets and society. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=b27bcba6-7811-40ca-8ec9-f3ef890b512f&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Friday (1x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 40,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 34.2% | TIME, August 2026 | | Click rate | 2.1% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Justin Worland, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Senior leaders shaping the climate transition. An engaged audience of executives and decision-makers spanning operating companies, finance, policy, consulting, communications and media. ### TIME Future Proof: key statements * Future Proof is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Future Proof is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/newsletters?i=b27bcba6-7811-40ca-8ec9-f3ef890b512f&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-futureproof-2026q3/subscribe?i=b27bcba6-7811-40ca-8ec9-f3ef890b512f&cr=time-nl-futureproof-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's climate and energy newsletter? Future Proof is TIME's weekly climate and energy newsletter, written by senior correspondent Justin Worland. It connects the energy transition to the decisions reshaping business, technology, policy and markets. It reaches 40,000 subscribers with a 34.2% open rate and a 2.1% click rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I follow the energy transition as a business story? Future Proof covers climate and energy as an economic and business story rather than only an environmental one. It publishes every Friday and is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who writes Future Proof? Justin Worland, a senior correspondent at TIME and an award-winning climate journalist, writes Future Proof. #### Is Future Proof free? Yes. Future Proof is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Bryan Walsh](https://time.com/author/bryan-walsh/)  ## Bryan Walsh Mar 24, 2014 7:00 PM UTC  Nearly 11 million gallons of oil spilled into Prince William Sound after the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill Nearly 11 million gallons of oil spilled into Prince William Sound after the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill Chris Wilkins—AFP/Getty Images  by [Bryan Walsh](https://time.com/author/bryan-walsh/)  ## Bryan Walsh Mar 24, 2014 7:00 PM UTC On a shelf at my home, I have a small jar that contains a smear of crude oil. I [dug it up](http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1902333,00.html) on the shore of a small island in Alaska’s Prince William Sound in May of 2009, on a reporting trip [for a story](http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1902809%5F1902810%5F1905172,00.html) about the legacy of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. That crude oil is more than 25 years old now, and its existence is a reminder of just how long lived the effects of a major oil accident can be. Years after the spill has been stopped, after the press has gone home, the crude oil released into a river or a sea will affect the biology of almost anything it touches—just as it continues to weigh on the people who live and work in the area fouled by crude. That’s worth remembering as we [observe the 25th anniversary](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/24/exxon-valdez-oil-spill-photos%5Fn%5F5020845.html) of the Exxon Valdez spill today. On Mar. 25, 1989, a tanker captained by Joseph Hazelwood ran aground on Alaska’s Bligh Reef, spilling nearly 11 million gallons (42 million liters) of crude oil into Alaska’s near-pristine Prince William Sound. The oil spread out to more than 1,300 miles (2,100 km) of coastline, choking bird and sea life, and permanently damaging the region’s ecology. Even now, you can still find some of that oil on remote beaches in the Sound, preserved by the cold. As of 2010,[ just 12 of the 32 ](http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/23/opinion/holleman-exxon-valdez-anniversary/)monitored wildlife populations, habitats and resource services affected by the spill were considered fully recovered or very likely recovered. The once-prosperous Pacific herring fishery [still remains closed](http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/op-ed/Opinion+spills+lessons+must+learn/9652436/story.html) after the population of the fish crashed in the years following the spill. While much of the Sound has rebounded, it will never be the same—even a quarter century later. The Exxon Valdez disaster was the biggest oil spill in U.S. history—until April 2010, when BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig was destroyed in a well blowout, leading to an oil gusher that lasted 87 days and resulted in more than 200 million gallons (757 million liters) of crude flowing into the Gulf of Mexico. While much of the oil was either cleaned up in a response operation that cost billions of dollars or was broken down by bacteria in the warm Gulf waters, the ecological damage from the spill was major, and almost four yeas later, scientists are only beginning to gauge the cost to marine life. Here’s one example: [in a new study](http://www.eurekalert.org/emb%5Freleases/2014-03/uomr-nss031914.php) published in the _Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences_, researchers from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and several universities assessed the impact of Deepwater Horizon oil on developing embryos of bluefin tuna, yellowfin tuna and amberjack, all commercially important fish species that spawn near the site of the accident. The research team exposed embryos taken from breeding facilities to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), a toxic agent released by crude oil. In each tested species, PAH exposure—at levels the researchers said was realistic for the Gulf spill—was linked to abnormalities in heart function and defects in heart development. As the paper concluded: --- > “” --- The _PNAS_ study isn’t the first to blame the BP oil spill for lingering problems with Gulf marine life; a study published earlier this month [linked the spill](http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/dolphins-exposed-to-deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-had-more-health-problems-than-others/2014/03/03/9931e8bc-9371-11e3-84e1-27626c5ef5fb%5Fstory.html) to dwindling numbers of bottlenose dolphins Louisiana’s Barataria Ba. Nor will it be the last. But that hasn’t slowed the rush to keep drilling going in the Gulf of Mexico, a rush that BP has now been allowed to rejoin after initially being barred from participation in lease sales in the region. The British company [won 24 out of 31 bids](http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/bp-set-to-expand-gulf-of-mexico-drilling-20140319) entered in an Interior Department offshore drilling lease sale held last week, paying more than $41 million for the right to explore oil and gas in the region. Altogether 1.7 million acres (.69 million hectares) off the coast of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama were opened up for new drilling. Despite evidence of the risks, nothing seems likely to stop operations in the Gulf. As long as there is offshore drilling and marine transport of oil, the risks of accidents will exist. Just two days before the 25th anniversary of the Exxon Valdez spill, at [least 168,000 gallons (636,000 liters) of oil spilled](http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/24/us/crews-work-to-contain-oil-from-leaking-barge-in-texas.html) from a barge in Galveston Bay in Texas. The spill is blocking the bustling Houston Ship Channel, one of the busiest seaways in the U.S., and threatens an environmentally sensitive bird sanctuary nearby. Given the small size of the spill, it won’t have the kind of major aftereffects seen in the Valdez and the BP dissters. But it’s one more reminder that as long as our economy remains so dependent on oil, there will always be the risk of another catastrophe that could linger on and on. **\[Update:** BP sent along a statement in response to the _PNAS_ study—I’m including it below: --- > “” --- It’s worth noting that the researchers mention in the paper how difficult it is to sample live but fragile yolksac larvae of big pelagic species like the bluefin tuna in the wild, which is the embryos used in the study were collected from breeding stations on land, not the Gulf itself.**\]** ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/35452/the-afterlife-of-oil-spills/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/35452/the-afterlife-of-oil-spills/"},"headline":"The Afterlife of Oil Spills","datePublished":"2014-03-24T19:00:39.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T06:55:32.021Z","description":"Twenty-five years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill, scientists are still reckoning with the ecological cost","url":"https://time.com/35452/the-afterlife-of-oil-spills/","keywords":["energy","Oil","health","BP"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte7f3d8ef9833cd03/698686f2810bbbb7ebc90a59/140324-exxon-valdez.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Bryan Walsh","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/bryan-walsh/"}],"articleSection":"Science","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte7f3d8ef9833cd03/698686f2810bbbb7ebc90a59/140324-exxon-valdez.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"140324-exxon-valdez","caption":"Exxon Valdez oil spill cleanup","creditText":"Chris Wilkins—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/science/","name":"Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/energy/","name":"energy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/35452/the-afterlife-of-oil-spills/","name":"The Afterlife of Oil Spills"}}]}] ```