--- title: Apple Hasn’t Solved the Smart Watch Dilemma description: Smart watches use up far more energy than dumb watches, and there’s nowhere to store that much energy in something the size of a watch canonical: https://time.com/3319330/apple-hasnt-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma/ author: Felix Salmon article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-09-10T21:04:39.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:48:09.523Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Apple Hasn't Solved the Smart Watch Dilemma og:description: The best-case scenario is that the product we saw will eventually iterate into something great og:url: https://time.com/3319330/apple-hasnt-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt524d1381747fc19b/6986a2b7cd804d8c37cccb0e/455057726.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2001 og:image:height: 1126 og:image:alt: Apple Unveils iPhone 6 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Apple Hasn't Solved the Smart Watch Dilemma twitter:description: The best-case scenario is that the product we saw will eventually iterate into something great twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt524d1381747fc19b/6986a2b7cd804d8c37cccb0e/455057726.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Apple Hasn't Solved the Smart Watch Dilemma > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7c0734b5-d788-421f-91a6-eadd4a488cea&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7c0734b5-d788-421f-91a6-eadd4a488cea&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=7c0734b5-d788-421f-91a6-eadd4a488cea&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=7c0734b5-d788-421f-91a6-eadd4a488cea&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Felix Salmon](https://time.com/author/felix-salmon/) ## Felix Salmon Sep 10, 2014 9:04 PM UTC  Apple CEO Tim Cook speaks about the new Apple Watch during an Apple special event at the Flint Center for the Performing Arts on September 9, 2014 in Cupertino, California. Apple CEO Tim Cook speaks about the new Apple Watch during an Apple special event at the Flint Center for the Performing Arts on September 9, 2014 in Cupertino, California. Justin Sullivan—Getty Images by [Felix Salmon](https://time.com/author/felix-salmon/) ## Felix Salmon Sep 10, 2014 9:04 PM UTC _LinkedIn Influencer Felix Salmon published this_ [_post_](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/article/20140909222153-10400206-apple-hasn-t-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma) _originally on_ [_LinkedIn_](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/article/20140909222153-10400206-apple-hasn-t-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma)_._ [_Follow_](https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=10400206&authType=name&authToken=iwxn&trk=pulse-det-athr%5Fprof-art%5Fhdr) _Felix on LinkedIn._ There’s a decent rule of thumb, when it comes to anything Apple: When it introduces something brand new, don’t buy version 1.o. Wait until the second or third version instead, you’ll be much better off. Does anybody remember OS 10.0? It was a disaster, and even people who installed it spent 90% of their time in OS 9 instead. The very first MacBook Air? An underpowered exercise in frustration. The original iPad? Heavy and clunky. The original iPod? Was not only heavy and clunky and expensive, it was also tied to the Macintosh, and didn’t work either alone or with a PC. The best-case scenario for the Apple Watch is that the product we saw announced Tuesday will eventually iterate into something really great. Because anybody who’s ever worn a watch will tell you: this thing has serious problems. For one thing, Apple has been worryingly silent on the subject of battery life, but there’s no indication that this thing will last even 24 hours. A watch’s battery should last for months; even watches which _don’t_ have batteries will last for a couple of days, if you have to wind them manually, or indefinitely, if they’re automatic and all you have to do is wear them. Watches might be complicated on the inside, but they’re simple on the outside, and they should never come with a charging cable. (To make matters worse, even though the Apple Watch only works if you have an iPhone, the iPhone charging cable will _not_ charge the Apple Watch; you need a different charging cable entirely.) Of course, the Apple Watch is more than just a watch. But it’s also _less_ than just a watch, which is a problem. It [probably isn’t waterproof](https://twitter.com/Pogue/status/509415324043972608), for instance — don’t take it swimming, or use it during any other watersport. Its battery life means that you can’t take it camping, and that you’re going to have to remember yet another charging cable any time you leave the house for more than about 18 hours. (And yes, if you end up unexpectedly spending the night somewhere, your watch will be a brick in the morning.) Behind all the shiny options (sport! gold! different straps!) the watch itself is always pretty much the same: thick, clunky, a computer strapped to your wrist. Which is great, I suppose, if you’re [the kind of person](https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/article/20140909195148-6388496-steve-who-how-the-apple-watch-is-designed-to-reignite-apple) who likes to strap a computer to your wrist. Here’s my main beef with the Apple Watch: Apple has always been the company which makes products for real people, rather than gadgets for geeks. It’s the Less Is More company, yet the Apple Watch is overloaded with features. It pays for things! It measures your heartbeat! It controls your TV! It stores your airline boarding pass! It can show you a picture of where you are on the planet, in glorious high-def Retina resolution! Etc, etc. Any one of these sounds quite clever: I like the idea, for instance, of being able to take a photo from my phone remotely. Useful for group selfies. But we’ve had watches which do lots of things for decades, and I can tell you that almost nobody actually uses those functions. By allowing thousands of different apps on its watch, Apple is buying into the More Is More mindset: make sure that the watch offers something for everybody. And in order to get there, it has had to create a whole system of twiddles and taps and swipes which you’re going to have to learn before you can really start using the watch. Put it this way: no one who only has one wrist is going to be wearing an Apple Watch. Apple’s website is now full of language saying things like “to pay with Apple Watch, just double-click the button under the Digital Crown and hold your wrist up to the contactless reader,” or “Swipe up from the watch face for Glances that quickly show you information you care about, such as your current location, stocks or your next meeting.” This isn’t easy: if you need to swipe with your opposite hand, what you’re doing is much more than a Glance. Indeed, we need to take it on trust that you’ll be able to simply tell the time just by looking at your watch. To save battery life, Apple has engineered the watch so that it’s off by default, and only turns on when you turn your wrist a certain way. In other words, Apple _hasn’t solved_ the basic smartwatch dilemma, which is that smart watches use up far more energy than dumb watches, and that there’s nowhere to store that much energy in something the size of a watch. Indeed, Apple has made the problem worse, by combining a powerful computer with a very bright, ultra-high-resolution, full-color display. Either of those things would require a lot of energy; both together require a very thick watch _and_ a limited battery life. It’s possible that in an iteration or two, Apple will have solved this problem. It’s possible — but, I’m not holding my breath. The problem has been around a very long time, and no one seems to have come close to solving it yet. So my best hope is for some kind of NanoWatch: a thinner, less fully-featured version of the Apple Watch, with a much less versatile display. If Apple manages to come up with a thin, waterproof watch which I can wear comfortably under a shirt cuff, one where I can tell the time just by looking at it, without having to recharge it twice a day, _then_ I’ll be interested. I’d want it to measure my activity like the Apple Watch does, but I’d be happy with the visual feedback to come from my iPhone. Similarly, if my watch vibrates to alert me of something, I’d be OK with checking my phone to see what exactly it was. But what I _don’t_ want is to start having to deal with as many watch charging cables as I have iPhone charging cables. Because that would drive me bonkers. [_Felix Salmon_](https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=10400206&authType=name&authToken=iwxn&trk=pulse-det-athr%5Fprof-art%5Fhdr) _is a senior editor at Fusion._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3319330/apple-hasnt-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3319330/apple-hasnt-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma/"},"headline":"Apple Hasn't Solved the Smart Watch Dilemma","datePublished":"2014-09-10T21:04:39.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:48:09.523Z","description":"Smart watches use up far more energy than dumb watches, and there’s nowhere to store that much energy in something the size of a watch","url":"https://time.com/3319330/apple-hasnt-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma/","keywords":["Innovation","iPhone 6","Apple watch"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt524d1381747fc19b/6986a2b7cd804d8c37cccb0e/455057726.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Felix Salmon","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/felix-salmon/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt524d1381747fc19b/6986a2b7cd804d8c37cccb0e/455057726.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Apple Unveils iPhone 6","caption":"Apple Unveils iPhone 6","creditText":"Justin Sullivan—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/innovation/","name":"Innovation"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3319330/apple-hasnt-solved-the-smart-watch-dilemma/","name":"Apple Hasn't Solved the Smart Watch Dilemma"}}]}] ```