--- title: Just Because You’re Mad at Obama Doesn’t Mean You Can’t Have Dinner at His House description: The White House Iftar boycott is a fruitless debate canonical: https://time.com/3002252/iftar-boycott/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-07-17T21:24:48.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-11T04:39:03.621Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Mad at Obama? You Can Still Have Dinner at His House og:description: The White House Iftar boycott is a fruitless debate og:url: https://time.com/3002252/iftar-boycott/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Mad at Obama? You Can Still Have Dinner at His House twitter:description: The White House Iftar boycott is a fruitless debate twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Just Because You're Mad at Obama Doesn't Mean You Can't Have Dinner at His House > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=9f6348fd-84ee-4df3-bb75-905e4670c217&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=9f6348fd-84ee-4df3-bb75-905e4670c217&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=9f6348fd-84ee-4df3-bb75-905e4670c217&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Patheos](https://time.com/author/patheos/) ## Patheos Contributor Jul 17, 2014 9:24 PM UTC by [Patheos](https://time.com/author/patheos/) ## Patheos Contributor Jul 17, 2014 9:24 PM UTC  _This_ [_article_](http://www.patheos.com/blogs/altmuslim/2014/07/the-white-house-iftar-boycott-why-the-debate/) _originally appeared on_ [_Patheos_](http://www.patheos.com/)_._ The other day in clinic when I asked a patient of mine what he did for work, he said, “Doc, I’m embarrassed to say it, but I’m a retired deputy Sheriff from LA.” I inquired about his hesitation. He noted how the department had deteriorated in morale and discipline, adding that once he was so proud to be a part of the department that if the Sheriff called him for duty, he could not say “no.” It’s much like if the President of United States calls one to serve our country, he said. How can one say “no?” It is his latter comment that has stuck with me. Time and again, I’m intrigued by the respect, [trust](http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/strategist/2011/03/rebuilding%5Fpublic%5Ftrust%5Fin%5Fgov.php) and prestige the office of POTUS carries in the minds of Americans, despite the contemporary vitriol and [polarizing](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/12/polarization-panel%5Fn%5F5489893.html) environment surrounding the office. When a national tragedy occurs, the President consoles the American people. And, when the President [addresses the nation,](http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/01/13/us/20110113%5FCONSOLATION%5FINTERACTIVE.html?ref=us&%5Fr=0) it brings much needed healing and comfort, as seen in the aftermath of recent mass shootings and terror incidents. It is for this reason, I contend, that when the President invites one for _Iftar_ (the fast-breaking meal in Ramadan), one responds gracefully and strives to attend_._ It is precisely the respect for this office and what it symbolizes – not necessarily the one who _holds_ the office – that inspires citizens. Therefore, if one wishes to boycott such an event in hopes of achieving a policy objective, I would direct that individual’s energies toward the ballot box. Imagine if 90 percent of American Muslims began casting votes; we would then be having a different conversation altogether. On Monday, hours before the White House Iftar_, a_ boycott petition was circulated and generated an unusual buzz, especially on social media, that was captured by the [Huffington Post](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/14/white-house-muslims%5Fn%5F5585851.html) and [Politico](http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2014/07/boycott-planned-for-obama-iftar-dinner-192080.html). The Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee’s [position](http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/07/14/arab-american-group-urges-boycott-of-white-house-iftar-dinner/), in favor of the boycott, was also released before the Iftar. The reaction was hardly surprising, as it came on the eve of a barbaric and brutal assault on the innocent women and children of Gaza. The loss of civilian life clearly outweighed any chronic grievances the Muslim community held, ranging from surveillance to Guantanamo Bay, which despite being constantly brought up directly with the President at these Iftarsin the past, had not received much consideration at all. At the Iftar, POTUS’s remarks included an emphasis on the right of Israel to defend itself while stating, in passing, a request to also [protect civilian life](http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/14/politics/white-house-iftar-dinner-mideast/index.html?hpt=hp%5Fc2) –- confirming the sentiments of boycott proponents. Furthermore, the news of [18 family members](http://america.aljazeera.com/multimedia/photo-gallery/2014/7/photos-gaza-al-batsh.html) who were killed in an aerial bombing of Gaza that broke earlier pointed to the extreme gravity of the situation. We, as Americans, cannot even begin to imagine the pain and suffering endured by the Gaza victims and their loved ones. And so, in the midst of such pain and injustice, it is completely understandable that an individual might not feel comfortable smiling for the cameras on the White House red carpet. So if one rather busied onself with humanitarian efforts, aid delivery and advocacy on the Gaza situation and decided to politely decline the invitation with an appropriate accompanying message, it would be completely reasonable and justified. Such a response would be graceful and have impact. The decision of each guest whether or not to attend is, of course, a personal choice. But regardless of the decision, the act should be done with purpose, dignity and grace. The arguments that I have seen from both sides of the debate merit consideration, minus the rare instances of calling theIftar participants sellouts (irrelevant in this case, since most attendees are from the diplomatic corps anyway; usually few American Muslims are invited). The event itself is symbolic in nature but does speak volumes about American Muslim contributions and the recognition of those contributions by the highest office of the land. And that is something that should not be dismantled but, instead, strengthened. In drawing lessons from Islamic history, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was invited to meet an elite group from a powerful tribe in Medina ([Banu Nadhir](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banu%5FNadir)) that was initially an ally but had begun to turn against him. He accepted the invitation at the expense of risk to his life. What followed suit is a matter of controversy. Nevertheless, the lesson derived here is the emphasis on attempting at dialogue and setting things right on part of the prophet (pbuh). Did Musa (Moses) walk into Pharaoh’s palace uninvited? Certainly not, he was invited and he went forth with an [ultimatum and a challenge](http://www.islambasics.com/view.php?bkID=85&chapter=16). In the White House _Iftar_ story, there is neither a Moses nor a Pharaoh, but only a challenge. And that challenge is for us to deliver results for the sake of all those who are suffering from inequities . And once again, it all starts at the [ballot box.](http://www.massvote.org/the-importance-of-voting/) Rather than boycotting the Iftar to show disapproval of the White House’s response to the situation in Gaza, this opportunity should be optimized, to make the Muslim presence felt and our voices heard. Many of you may have heard of [Tarek Abu Khdeir](http://mondoweiss.net/2014/07/eyewitness-beating-teenager.html), a teenager from Florida who was nearly beaten to death by earlier this month. Two IDF soldiers beat him to unconsciousness after which he was imprisoned without medical care. Tariq’s teenage cousin Muhammed was burned to death on July 2. I believe one useful petition to circulate next year would be to urge the White House to invite Tarek and his family to participate in the Iftar, perhaps even reward him for his courage and determination. _Dr. Faisal Qazi is the co-Founder of MiNDS, a community development foundation local to Southern California and VP of the Whitestone Foundation – a national American Muslim community-building project. He serves as a member of City of Fullerton’s Community Development Commission._ _Read more from Patheos:_ * [Darkest Before Dawn: Ramadan in a Time of Disillusionment](http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mmw/2014/07/darkest-before-dawn-ramadan-in-a-time-of-disillusionment/) * [Activism Overload: Tell Us How to Help](http://www.patheos.com/blogs/whitehindu/2014/07/activism-overload-tell-us-how-to-help/) * [When Will We Have an Atheist President?](http://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightatheism/2014/07/when-will-we-have-an-atheist-president/) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3002252/iftar-boycott/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3002252/iftar-boycott/"},"headline":"Just Because You're Mad at Obama Doesn't Mean You Can't Have Dinner at His House","datePublished":"2014-07-17T21:24:48.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-11T04:39:03.621Z","description":"The White House Iftar boycott is a fruitless debate","url":"https://time.com/3002252/iftar-boycott/","keywords":["Obama","Religion","Muslim","President","faith","Islam"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Patheos","jobTitle":"Contributor","url":"https://time.com/author/patheos/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3002252/iftar-boycott/","name":"Just Because You're Mad at Obama Doesn't Mean You Can't Have Dinner at His House"}}]}] ```