--- title: Bowe Bergdahl: Chuck Hagel Criticized By Congress For Taliban Swap description: He recites a litany of reasons, but lawmakers keep swinging sticks canonical: https://time.com/2859345/chuck-hagel-bowe-bergdahl-congress/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-06-11T17:56:22.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T08:21:25.987Z article:section: Politics og:title: Hagel becomes a Pentagon Piñata over Bergdahl deal og:description: He recites a litany of reasons, but lawmakers keep swinging sticks og:url: https://time.com/2859345/chuck-hagel-bowe-bergdahl-congress/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt290a4683161857c2/6986971badae449407543a38/chuck-hagel-bergdahl.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4008 og:image:height: 2255 og:image:alt: Chuck Hagel og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Hagel becomes a Pentagon Piñata over Bergdahl deal twitter:description: He recites a litany of reasons, but lawmakers keep swinging sticks twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt290a4683161857c2/6986971badae449407543a38/chuck-hagel-bergdahl.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Hagel Becomes Pentagon Piñata For Lawmakers Upset Over Bergdahl Deal > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=dc6346f1-2ef0-49e6-817f-6f8a3afe5c78&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=dc6346f1-2ef0-49e6-817f-6f8a3afe5c78&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=dc6346f1-2ef0-49e6-817f-6f8a3afe5c78&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jun 11, 2014 5:56 PM UTC  Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel listens to opening statements prior to testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 11, 2014. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel listens to opening statements prior to testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, June 11, 2014. Susan Walsh—AP by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jun 11, 2014 5:56 PM UTC There’s next to nothing Congress can do about the Obama Administration’s swapping five senior Taliban leaders for long-imprisoned Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. That means they can only vent their outrage over the done deal. They [finally got a chance to do that](http://time.com/2857505/chuck-hagel-bergdahl/) Wednesday when Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel traveled to Capitol Hill to retro-justify the trade. Both Republican and Democratic members of the 62-member House Armed Services Committee criticized the way the deal was carried out, and the ultimate price paid by the U.S. The fact that they couldn’t reverse the deal only exacerbated their anger, and led them to tongue-lash Hagel. “Answer it! Answer it! Answer it!” bellowed Rep. Jeff Miller to Hagel after the Florida Republican suggested the Pentagon was delaying its investigation into Bergdahl’s capture by keeping him under wraps in a German military hospital. “I don’t like the implication of the question,” Hagel countered. It quickly became clear that the tussle wasn’t over Bergdahl’s fate so much, or even Hagel, as it was about the stark lack of trust between the Administration and Congress. President Barack Obama’s point man was little more than a piñata to lawmakers, who seemed more intent on bashing the President than listening to Hagel’s justifications, or the legal reasoning of Stephen Preston, the Pentagon’s top lawyer. Rep. Howard McKeon, R-Calif., the panel chairman, said a closed-door briefing on the deal by Administration officials earlier this week was “misleading and at times blatantly false.” He blasted the Administration for “its unprecedented negotiations with terrorists” (The George W. Bush Administration also [negotiated](http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130394) with terrorists, so “unprecedented” might not be the correct word here). Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the senior Democrat on the panel, offered cover, of a sort, to the Pentagon. “The Department of Defense, in my experience, has been very good about consulting with us and about working with this body,” he said. “The White House, on the other hand, has not been very good about keeping in touch with Congress.” Hagel acknowledged legitimate reasons for congressional ire, but cited the need for swiftness and secrecy for keeping lawmakers in the dark about the deal, despite a law requiring the White House to notify Congress 30 days before any detainees leave Guantanamo. “I recognize that the speed with which we moved in this case has caused great frustration, legitimate questions and concern,” he said. “We could have done a better job… of keeping you informed.” Lawmakers didn’t focus on the fact that Army General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Admiral James Winnefeld, the vice chairman—the nation’s top two military officers—approved of the swap. While many in the military didn’t like the particulars of the deal, they thought getting Bergdahl home was the top priority. “He may be a son-of-a-bitch, but he’s _our_ son-of -a-bitch,” James Mattis, a retired four-star Marine general who served as chief of U.S. Central Command from 2010 to 2013, said earlier this week. “So let’s get him back, let the Army investigate, and we’ll sort it out.” As the hearing droned on, the Washington _Post_ [disclosed](http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/bergdahls-writings-reveal-a-fragile-young-man/2014/06/11/fb9349fe-f165-11e3-bf76-447a5df6411f%5Fstory.html?hpid=z1) some of Bergdahl’s pre-capture writings—and the fact that the Coast Guard had discharged him for psychological reasons in 2006 after 26 days in basic training. That should have required the Army to issue a waiver allowing him to enlist, something the service was routinely doing because it was having difficulty attracting sufficient soldiers when Bergdahl enlisted in 2008. Some of the facts left Hagel flailing. While the five Taliban released “were part of the planning” of attacks on the U.S. and its allies, he said, “we have no direct evidence of any direct involvement \[by them\] in direct attacks on the United States or any of our troops.” Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) seized the opening: “So your point was they didn’t pull the trigger, but they were senior commanders of the Taliban military who directed operations against the United States and its coalition partners. Would that be a better way to do it?” “That’s right,” Hagel responded. “That’s right.” “Just like bin Laden didn’t pull a trigger,” McKeon said after a pause. Rep. Walter Jones (R-N.C.) expressed chagrin that Bergdahl’s release wasn’t part of a bigger peace accord. “My Marines down in Camp Lejeune, quite frankly, are tired of going to Afghanistan and getting their legs blown off,” he said. Despite the venom, lawmakers had little interest in swinging at Hagel, other than as a way to smack Obama. And they had political cover: A pair of polls released Tuesday said more Americans opposed than supported the deal. That adds jet fuel to the controversy, which only means it will continue to burn. Beyond the Army’s investigation into the circumstances surrounding Bergdahl’s capture, McKeon opened the hearing by promising his panel will conduct “a full investigation” surrounding the deal that won Bergdahl his freedom. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/2859345/chuck-hagel-bowe-bergdahl-congress/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/2859345/chuck-hagel-bowe-bergdahl-congress/"},"headline":"Hagel Becomes Pentagon Piñata For Lawmakers Upset Over Bergdahl Deal","datePublished":"2014-06-11T17:56:22.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T08:21:25.987Z","description":"He recites a litany of reasons, but lawmakers keep swinging sticks","url":"https://time.com/2859345/chuck-hagel-bowe-bergdahl-congress/","keywords":["Military","Congress","Pentagon"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt290a4683161857c2/6986971badae449407543a38/chuck-hagel-bergdahl.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt290a4683161857c2/6986971badae449407543a38/chuck-hagel-bergdahl.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Chuck Hagel","caption":"Chuck Hagel","creditText":"Susan Walsh—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/military/","name":"Military"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/2859345/chuck-hagel-bowe-bergdahl-congress/","name":"Hagel Becomes Pentagon Piñata For Lawmakers Upset Over Bergdahl Deal"}}]}] ```