Whether you’re hiking across campus or roaming the halls of your high school, you need a bag that’s functional as well as fashionable.+ READ ARTICLE
Related Article: The 6 Best Back-to-School Bags
Related Article: The 6 Best Back-to-School Bags
The back-to-school prep period is a particularly stressful time of year for parents and children alike. According to a survey that was commissioned by the coupon site ebates and is being released this week, nearly all of the adults and teens polled said that the start of the school year was stressing them out in one or more ways.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the teenagers surveyed overwhelmingly said that they were most concerned that school would mess up the leisurely (lack of) schedule that they’re enjoying over the summer. The top two named sources of stress for teens were “Waking up early to get to class” (cited by 69% of those polled) and “Getting too much homework” (64%). Rounding out the top five were “Not liking my teachers” (42%), “Not having the right clothes” (32%), and “Not fitting in” (31%).
The top back-to-school stress point for adults, on the other hand, was “Shopping for clothes and school items,” cited by 56% of those surveyed. The stress of shopping outranked hectic student schedules (50%), helping with homework (38%), bullying at school (31%), and bad teachers (29%).
At first glance, the results indicate that students and parents alike seem to be saying that shopping and having the right clothes are of higher importance than potentially huge problems like bullying and subpar teachers. Are most of us really that superficial?
Maybe, maybe not. A closer look at why consumers are so stressed about shopping shows that the big concern essentially comes down to money rather than pressure to be up on the latest fashion trends. According to data released last week by the National Retail Federation, “the average family with children in grades K-12 will spend $669.28 on apparel, shoes, supplies and electronics, up 5 percent from $634.78 last year.” The typical family with a high school student is expected to spend even more, $682.99.
Given the hefty back-to-school bill parents are facing and the fact that, for example, students are now expected to arrive at school in possession of 18 items on a classroom checklist, on average, no wonder shopping is stressing so many families out right about now. More than half of parents said that their No. 1 concern about back-to-school shopping was simply not being able to afford everything they’re expected to buy.
What’s more, it must be pointed out, many of these stress points are related. Parents and kids worry about shopping and clothes at least partly because they’re concerned about bullying and fitting in at school. And bullying and bad teachers, while possibly disastrous for the student experience, are far less common, one hopes, than the problem that seemingly every middle-class family budget confronts: affording all the stuff our kids want and/or that our kids’ school requires.
Nine out ten Americans in the ebates survey said that they’ll save during back-to-school shopping via coupons, discounts, and sales, among other methods. Retailers understand that consumers are primed to look for back-to-school deals at this time of year—in fact, many stores launched back-to-school offers before the last school year even ended—and virtually every Sunday circular is filled with school-related sales and deals lately. So no matter what your student needs to prepare for the fall, there’s almost no reason to pay full price.
If you’ve held off so far from making some or all of your back-to-school purchases, there’s good reason you might want to wait a little longer. No fewer than 16 states are offering sales tax holidays this summer, with the vast majority waiving sales tax on various back-to-school purchases for a few days around August 1.
In Chicago, VOCEL – a small education non-profit for children from under-resourced communities – is behind one of the first initiatives to use crowdfunding to open a preschool, the AFP reports.
“Many for-profit organizations have used crowdsourcing in the past several years to get off the ground, to spread their ideas among a wide crowd, and we thought why couldn’t we do this for a non-profit?” Jesse Ilhardt, director of education for VOCEL, told AFP.
VOCEL started a $70,000 campaign online, asking the public to contribute funds for a preschool center in Chicago. To learn more about crowdfunding in education, watch the video above.
Summer time has officially arrived, which means that many working parents are now frantically looking for fun and affordable summer child care. The words “camp” and “affordable” aren’t often used in the same sentence, but I’ve found summer camps can be inexpensive—if you deal hunt.
But first, let me address the alternatives: In-home childcare in my area of Houston runs $10 an hour for two children. Sure, I would love to have someone here at home to watch them and make their lunch and take them to the pool, but based on a normal 40-hour week I would be paying $400. That’s $4,800 for a 12 week summer. Daycare in my area ranges from $900 to $1700 a month. Multiply that by two, add on summer field trip fees, and I may as well quit working for the month, because I will be spending most of my income on child care costs.
If you can believe it, my husband and I have found that summer camps not only helped us save over these other options, but provided our kids with some really great experiences.
My first secret: Checking discount deal sites like Groupon and LivingSocial, which sometimes offer summer camps with steep cuts off the regular price.
For example, my daughters really wanted to attend a robotics camp, and unsurprisingly technology camps are expensive. In our case it was $399 a child for a camp that ran from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. I wasn’t going to fork over almost $800 to send my two girls there for a single week, but I still wanted to give them the chance to try out something they were interested in, especially something in the math and science field.
So I started searching for a cheaper option, and that’s when I found a Groupon discount promotion for the program. We were able to save over 50% with our online coupon, cutting our costs down to $318 for both girls, or less than the sticker price for one child.
My second secret: Look to local churches and schools, which often host some of the least expensive camp options and yet as part of their mission provide volunteers, teachers or paid personnel who have training and experience.
A local church offers an amazing music camp for just $90 per week per child, from 9 am to 3 p.m. My children not only enjoy the music experience but also learn during special sessions: One is taking a guitar class while the other is learning set design and production. At the end of the week, the camp puts on a performance for friends and family in the evening, so that everyone can attend. I may have to pack their lunch, but the total cost of this particular camp is only $180 for both girls, saving me more than $200 in weekly summer childcare expenses over a sitter or upwards of $500 vs. a daycare.
Both camps offer additional hours both before and after the camp for a nominal fee, so parents who don’t have a flexible schedule can still take advantage of these opportunities during the summer. Most camps will offer this option, just be sure to check how much extra it will be to make sure it’s still a good deal.
This is my fifth year using summer camps instead of traditional child care and baby-sitting options. Not only do I save money each month, but the children also get the opportunity to pursue a number of different activities that we may not have the time or the budget for during the school year. Now that’s summer fun!
Lisa Carey is a mom to four children ranging in ages from 7 to 27, a freelance writer, social media maven and blogger. You can find her saving for tomorrow and living for today on Money Saving Parent. She also shares parenting tips in her Houston Family column on Examiner.com.
Watch for other topics this week on affordable last-minute child care:
FRIDAY: Negotiating with your boss for flex time
After paying just under $8,000 a year for summer daycare for five years—and that’s with my nearly 50% discount as a preschool teacher—it was pretty amazing how quickly my husband and I found a use for all that money once our son went to kindergarten in the fall of 2012.
So, when summer rolled around last year, the thought of having to lay out an enormous sum every week for 12 weeks for some kind of childcare was thoroughly overwhelming.
Determined to find a way to save money, I explored my options. First, a nanny: But at around $400 a week in my area of Hartford, Conn.—or a total of $4,800 for the summer—that was way too expensive with only one child. Then, camp: But I quickly realized that choosing an array of programs to mix and match was out of the question, too. Since the times varied, I would have to find transportation to and from, as well as after-camp care for some of them.
So what did I do? I ended up going right back to the daycare where my son had gone before (and where I happened to work), and I got a little creative by leaning on some friends.
The daycare has a weekly fee for the summer of $292 a week—already much cheaper than the nanny, and with my discount it comes to about $150 a week—plus, a “program fee” of around $300 to cover the costs of busing the children to all of their special activities.
In order to cut costs over the summer I ended up asking—okay, maybe begging—for help from my sister-in-law (a stay-at-home mom) and my good friend (a teacher who is home for the summer). I talked them both into taking my son for a day each week, by bartering my own baby-sitting services on the weekends and making sure to always bring something in thanks when I came by with my son. This included wine, baked goods and, of course, cash if they were going out somewhere with my son. Absolutely anything I could think of that would show my appreciation of this help that they so kindly bestowed upon me.
Since my son was only at the center three full-days, my costs came down by another $60 (though if I didn’t have my discount, this move would have saved me $100). Plus, the daycare even pro-rated the summer “program fee” since he was going to be missing some of the special activities.
A well-placed vacation and a perfectly timed week-long visit from the grandparents further reduced what I ended up paying by the end of the summer. Total outlay: about $1,000.
Best of all, my bartering plan was not only good for my wallet; it was also good for my son. I liked the idea that instead of being at a camp all the time he was able to spend extra time with his cousins and my best-friend’s daughter who is close to him in age. And on the weekends he got to be with these good friends as well, since my baby-sitting service was in full swing. My son got to have a special summer with lots of family and friends nearby.
And now that summer is upon us again, I fully plan to engage help from my friends and family for a second year to continue this tradition.
Preschool teacher Elissha Park blogs at The Broke Mom’s Guide to Everything. She has a 7-year-old son with whom she loves going on day trips around her hometown of Hartford, Conn.
Watch for other topics this week on affordable last-minute child care:
FRIDAY: Negotiating with your boss for flex time
During my first summer as a working mom, I booked my kids—then ages 2 and 3—for camp after camp after camp. There were sports camps and animal camps and water camps and cooking camps and maybe even a camp about… camp?
I didn’t really care—I was just looking for a different camp for each of the weeks I needed to fill.
Then I spent the next 40 million hours of my life trying to coordinate drop-offs and pick-ups and back-ups for the evenings when my husband or I might need to stay late for a meeting—or for the random days that the camp was dismissing at noon instead of 5. And then I spent all summer long in a blur of camps that all seemed to run together. I could never quite remember which one my kids were supposed to be at, and whether I needed to pack a lunch or a swimsuit or tiger-print t-shirts.
It was hectic.
And expensive. I think I shelled out something like $6,600 that year, and that was with my mother-in-law picking the children up to avoid after-camp care costs.
So the following summer, I did a very daring thing. I ditched the camps altogether and decided that my kids were going to have a summer at home. I hired a college student from nearby Ohio University in Cincinnati, whom my husband found through a coworker, and paid her $12 an hour. It turned out to be the best decision we ever made.
My kids got to be at home—where they were able to take bike rides and nature walks, play with sidewalk chalk, run through sprinklers, eat dripping popsicles on the back porch. It was summer, and they were leisurely doing all of the playing that they should be doing.
My house was cleaner than usual. When we hired our college sitter, light housecleaning was included in the job description. So when the kids were eating lunch, she’d clean the kitchen for me. When the kids were doing their chores, she was picking up toys and vacuuming the floors. I never asked her to clean a toilet—although how awesome would that be!?—but walking in the door after a long day at work and finding that things were a little neater than when I left was amazing.
Oh, and did I mention that she also folded the kids’ laundry each week and helped them put it away? It was like I had died and gone to laundry heaven.
Dinner was started. I know, I’m starting to sound totally spoiled here. Our college sitter would also start dinner prep for me. While the kids munched on a little appetizer, she’d chop the veggies or mix together the casserole. And the meal would be ready to pop in the oven when I walked in the door. No more rushing home to starving kids and realizing that I had forgotten to plug in the crockpot. Again.
I saved more than just my sanity. Not only did I no longer have to worry about getting my kids dressed each morning for camp or about what damage feeding them hot dogs every night would do, but I pocketed about $900 that summer with the arrangement over what I’d spent the previous year.
My advice: If you’re trying to find a way to keep multiple kids cared for this summer, try a sitter. It’ll save you hundreds, get your life in order, and restore your sanity.
Need some help finding your Mary Poppins? I’ve always found the best baby sitters through word-of-mouth. My husband and I let everyone know we’re looking for a summer sitter. But if we can’t find someone on a recommendation, we turn to Care.com. We sign up for the online service for one month (about $40) when we’re looking for someone and create an ad. You can put in specifics about your family, what you’re willing to pay and even note if you would like help with light household tidying. People can then answer your ad or you can search the site for registered sitters, complete with background checks.
Before we hire anyone, I like to meet with them to get a sense of who they are and to see if my kids like them. In the past, I’ve had sitters I thought were great, but then my kids thought they were the worst, so now I always make sure my kids are there when I meet a sitter for the first time. This gives me a chance to see them interact with the kids, and if they’re awkward or uncomfortable, I know it’s not going to work. You just kind of have to go with your gut feeling about someone.
Making that daring move to a sitter a few summers ago really was the best decision—especially because now that I have three kids, I can only imagine what my bill and schedule would be like if I’d stayed with all those camps.
Anna Luther is a social media consultant and the founder of My Life and Kids, where she strives to make you feel better about your messy, crazy, fabulous life. She lives in the midwest with her husband and three kids, ages 3, 5, and 6.
Watch for other topics later this week on affordable last-minute child care:
FRIDAY: Negotiating with your boss for flex time
Last summer, retailers raised eyebrows by rolling out back-to-school sales in early July, within a week or two of when kids escaped the clutches of teachers, principals, and algebra homework. “In seven and a half years, I’ve never once seen so much emphasis put on back-to-school before July 4,” National Retail Federation spokeswoman Kathy Grannis told AdAge at the time.
Fast-forward to June 2014, and retailers are at it again, pushing back-to-school sales earlier than ever. Consumers are getting the message that the time to purchase gear for the upcoming school year is before the current school year has ended. Like, now.
J.C. Penney began promoting back-to-school sales last weekend, according to Consumerist. Walmart already has a back-to-school web page for student fashions, backpacks, and other school gear, as well as another page devoted to back-to-college apparel and tech. Target just introduced a college registry program, so that students can try to get other people to buy them stuff. Apple’s back-to-school promotional deals are expected to be announced any day now. And Lands’ End? It started zapping customers with e-mails a couple of weeks ago, pushing the idea that early June is a fine time to buy school uniforms that kids won’t wear until around Labor Day.
It’s totally understandable why retailers try to move back-to-school shopping earlier and earlier each year. Families generally have finite resources they can allocate to back-to-school fashion and paraphernalia, and once the pencils, protractors, glue sticks, notebooks, and a few new outfits are purchased, their back-to-school expenditures are done (in theory). Retailers want to beat the competition to the punch, before the family’s back-to-school budget is depleted.
“Retailers are going to do what they can to try to get consumers into the stores to shop, but the fact of the matter is they might not have much luck,” Britt Beemer, chairman of America’s Research Group, explained to CNBC. “There aren’t any parents that I can find who have even thought of back-to-school shopping, because for most kids, they haven’t even gotten out of school yet.”
Still, even if shoppers don’t actually buy back-to-school stuff in June, the enticements may get them thinking about their needs for the upcoming school year. Panic sets in for a lot of overwhelmed parents, and they’re more apt to want to cross all of their children’s back-to-school items off their list as soon as possible. How can you relax on a summer vacation when you know there will be dorm rooms to decorate and Number 2 pencils that need to be purchased?
What’s more, early-season promotional efforts are limited mostly to the digital world. It’s much cheaper and easier for a retailer to send out an e-mail blast or put up a back-to-school web page than it is to rearrange shelves and create promotional sections inside thousands of stores. That’ll happen soon enough, of course, during the especially puzzling period when you’re likely to encounter Fourth of July, back to school, Christmas in July, and plain old summer sales in your local megamart, perhaps mixed in with the odd early Halloween aisle.
Of course, retailers risk some customer backlash by taking the expansion of shopping seasons too far. So-called “Christmas creep,” the phenomenon in which the Christmas shopping season kicks off in September and Christmas ads air within a few days of Labor Day weekend, has caused many an observer to groan in exasperation.
When the calendar says one thing and retailers are telling consumers something very different via sales and promotions, the result can be jarring, even off-putting. Yet retailers assume shoppers have short memories, and they hope that whatever bad feelings a too-early sale produces are outweighed by deals that are just too good to pass up.
One of the roles our education system is supposed to play is to prepare kids to be responsible citizens, with the skills needed to be successful in adulthood. All of the various classes — starting in kindergarten, where they lay out the fundamentals of reading,writing, sharing and even early math — are designed to be a set of building blocks of knowledge. Each consecutive year introduces new blocks in kids’ education, designed to get them ready for life so that they’re capable of earning a living.
For some reason, all of the classes I took from about third grade forward are still burned into my mind. Even today, I can go back in time and remember how my fifth-grade teacher got me interested in math or how my seventh-grade teacher’s method of teaching Spanish crippled my ability to learn that language due to his “repetitive” teaching methods.
However, one class in seventh grade has become very important to me, as I use the skills I learned in that class every day of my life: That class was my typing class. I can still envision that class as if it were yesterday, with my seat in the middle of the first row, learning to touch-type on an IBM Selectric typewriter. I even remember the line I had to type over and over again as part of a test to determine how fast I typed: “Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.” I can still touch-type that sentence today in about five seconds. Back then, the goal was to touch type at about 90 words per minute.
While the typewriter is now a thing of the past, typing and keyboards remain highly relevant today. In most cases, they’re the main way most of us enter data into our computers. And understanding the QWERTY layout is important when using a touch keyboard or even when programming our set-top boxes or other devices that use a keyboard for input.
Now, one could argue that kids these days seem to intuitively know how to use technology. Even at an early age, they start touching screens and keyboards, quickly learning how to navigate around all types of digital devices. The need for kids to learn how to code isn’t important, right? While that’s true to some extent, fundamentally understanding how these technologies work and how they can ultimately be customized for even greater functionality would enhance kids’ experiences with digital devices and could become much more important to them later in life.
Anyone that has taken an introductory programming class will tell you that at the very least, it helped them understand basic programming logic, structure and design. Even those who did not go on to become software engineers say that the fundamentals of programming a computer at the coding level has helped them shape how they think logically, has sharpened their common sense and, in a lot of cases, has helped them apply what they have learned to getting more out of their smartphones, tablets, computers and other devices that now populate their lives.
We live in a digital age in which technology plays a role in much of what we do every day. We use technology at the office, at school and at home. Digital devices are all around us. However, in many cases, we barely scratch the surface of what technology can do for us. We pretty much accept the fundamental role technology plays in our lives and mostly use the basic functionality of each of our digital devices.
Yet, when hardware and software designers create devices, they usually add a great deal of features and functions that most people barely use. That’s O.K. in a broad sense, since we “hire” our devices to handle things like phone calls, messaging, music and entertainment. But as technology has evolved, especially mobile technology, we are now holding in our hands real personal computers that can do much more than these fundamental functions. Even our TVs and appliances are becoming multipurpose devices designed to be more than meets the eye.
While most people will never get under the hood to try and change the code of an appliance or device they use, by learning the fundamentals of creating the software code that runs our devices, a person will gain a greater understanding of how their devices work, and would be more inclined to go beyond their devices’ basic functionality.
A coding class would also help them gain a greater understanding of how technology is designed and how software serves as the medium for triggering all of a device’s capabilities. This type of knowledge could be important in a future working environment where they’re called upon to use technology as part of their overall job.
It goes without saying, but understanding how technology works makes it much easier for a person to get the most out of it.
In an important article on GreaterSchools.org, author Hank Pellissier includes a comment from a recognized authority on programming. Douglas Rushkoff, author of Program or Be Programmed and evangelist for Codeacademy, is one of the nation’s leading digital crusaders. He argues that our schools need to incorporate computer programming into the core curriculum or get left behind. “It’s time Americans begin treating computer code the way we do the alphabet or arithmetic,” he writes.
Mr. Rushkoff sees the need to teach coding in order to create more hardware and software engineers to meet the rising demands for skilled tech workers. I agree wholeheartedly with this, since the U.S. is far behind in having a robust technical workforce created within our own borders. We rely heavily on coders in China, India and other parts of the world to meet the high demand for programming skills. I also agree that coding is just as important as other basic learning skills, since technology is now an important part of all of our lives. Understanding coding would give our kids a foundation in understanding how technology works, serving them well even if they do not become professional programmers.
One of my passions has been to help bring technology into the education system: I have worked on the sidelines with the State of Hawaii to champion the role of personal computers in education for decades. It has been rewarding to see how computers have impacted the educational process throughout the U.S., with every school system in America now having some type of computer aided learning programs in use today.
But it’s time for schools to realize that technology is now a part of our lifestyle. Helping our kids understand how technology works at the ground level and how it can be used to its fullest potential needs to be a building block that’s added to the educational curriculum. At best, it could get kids interested in tech as a career. At the least, it could equip them to handle more and more technology-related devices that are now part of our lives.
Bajarin is the president of Creative Strategies Inc., a technology industry analysis and market-intelligence firm in Silicon Valley. He contributes to Big Picture, an opinion column that appears every week on TIME Tech.
Schools are constantly facing backlash from students for strict dress codes that seem to only apply to young women, but this one may take the cake. A Utah high school took a bold step against tank tops and low-cut tees this week by randomly altering the yearbook photos of female students before publication.
Female students who wore tank tops and low-cut tees in their yearbook pictures, taken last fall, were startled by the fact that Wasatch High School had digitally added sleeves and raised the necklines of their tops. The school said in a statement published Thursday that the alteration was done to comply with the school’s dress code, which bans “extreme clothing” including “inappropriately short, tight, or revealing shorts, skirts, dresses, tank shirts, halter or crop tops.”
“Last fall when yearbook photos were taken, a large sign (4 feet by 5 feet) was placed where students could see it before having their photo taken. The sign told students that school dress standards would be enforced,” the statement reads. “Tank tops, low cut tops, inappropriate slogans on shirts, etc. would not be allowed. If a student violated this policy, the sign told them explicitly that the photos may be edited to correct the violation. The sign was plainly visible to all students who were having their photos taken.”
But students told local news station Fox 13 that the main source of their anger was the random nature of the schools editing. (One student also said the alteration “looked like white out on my skin”)
“I feel like they put names in a hat and pick and choose who,” sophomore Rachel Russel told Fox13. “There were plenty of girls that were wearing thicker tank tops and half of them got edited and half of them didn’t.”
The school’s response: our bad. “In the application of these graphic corrections, the high school yearbook staff did make some errors and were not consistent in how they were applied to student photos and the school apologizes for that inconsistency.”
Welcome to the era of the social media contract. On May 7, high school senior Andrew Muennink became a Twitter folk hero by getting his art teacher to agree that if his tweet got 15,000 retweets, his class would get out of its end of year exam. And hey, considering Round Rock High School’s close proximity to tech-savvy Austin, Texas, this social media stunt might prove more valuable to his future career than an art test anyway.
The school administration did not agree. Even though Meunnink met his goal number weeks before his deadline, Round Rock High School announced that the students would be taking the test regardless. “A deal was made and it should be owned up to,” Muennink told ABC via direct message.
But Muennink’s (failed) effort has now inspired other students across the country:
The retweets for finals concept has become a full blown meme:
Some looking less legitimate than others:
Every classroom has its own spin, though. Rather than retweets, one high school classroom just wants to get on Ellen:
Other teachers are throwing in promises of pizza parties to sweeten the deal:
And numbers have gone up to 35,000:https://twitter.com/NicBrinsley/status/46442953310641766
To three million and one…
We can finally stop worrying about the country’s ridiculously low-test scores. Our Twitter game is under control.