MONEY Ask the Expert

When Putting Most of Your Eggs in One Basket Can Make Sense

Investing illustration
Robert A. Di Ieso, Jr.

Q: A recent Money issue recommends consolidating accounts at a single brokerage. I’d like to do that, but we worry about having all of our eggs in one basket. What if the company’s systems are hacked, my password gets compromised, or the company gets managed like Enron or the big banks in 2008? – Shirley in North Carolina

A: These are valid concerns, no doubt, but you are still better off consolidating your accounts to the extent you can, says Michael Garry, a certified financial planner and chief compliance officer at Yardley Wealth Management in Newtown, Penn.

For starters, most brokerage firms offer protection should someone gain unauthorized access to your account. (If you share your password with your unscrupulous cousin or are otherwise negligent, it’s a different story.)

Check your firm’s brokerage account agreement to understand exactly who’s liable when and for what.

To make sure you’re covered in the event that your firm goes belly up, see if accounts are protected by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). This insurance, which is not unlike Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation protection offered at banks, covers up to $500,000 per account type at each firm. “Most big firms also have insurance on top of that,” notes Garry.

Those safeguards are important, but here’s the thing: The best way to protect your nest egg is to regularly check your account for suspicious activity and routinely change your passwords. “It’s a lot harder to be vigilant if you have six or seven different accounts,” says Garry.

More importantly, having too many accounts poses an even bigger risk than a security breach or bankruptcy – mismanaging your savings. “Remember that your asset allocation can account for 90% of your performance,” Garry adds. When your accounts are spread out, he says, it’s much harder to gauge how you’re invested, measure your performance and make necessary changes to your allocation.

Of course, if you are going to put most of your eggs in one basket, make sure it’s the right basket.

In addition to the right insurance and security measures, look for a firm that offers the right mix of investment products, tools and research. Fees should be a big part of your equation. Just keep in mind that the costs associated with long-term investing may be very different than those of, say, trading stock.

It may very well be that no single firm offers exactly everything you need. In that case, it may make sense to do business with more than one firm.

You may, for example, keep most of your assets with the brokerage that offers the best retirement-planning tools and broadest selection of no-transaction-fee mutual funds, but then designate a discount broker for buying and selling individual stocks. Under that scenario, a little distance doesn’t hurt.

MONEY financial advisers

A Financial Adviser Asks: Should I Always Be Closing?

A financial planner wonders how, and how hard, he should be selling himself to potential clients.

Should financial planners Always Be Closing?

This question came up recently in a conversation I had with a brokerage executive looking to start a registered investment advisory firm. He had spent his three-decade career working at a major brokerage and had achieved a significant amount of success. As told me about the superior sales training he had received at his old firm, he commented that when working with clients and prospective clients, you needed not only to have product expertise but also to be on the lookout for opportunities to “close.” In other words, as they said in Glengarry Glen Ross, “Always be closing.”

As those words rolled off his tongue, I cringed. Despite being in the financial services industry for over 23 years, I was not raised at a brokerage like his. I thought, “I became a financial planner because I wanted to help people make good choices about their money.” In my mind, being a financial planner was not about transactions or being a stockbroker; it was about relationships.

I disagreed with him, and I was gearing up for battle in our conversation. Maybe you’ve heard that when it comes to professional sports, 90% to 95% of it is mental.

Well, I hit a mental wall.

As his words lingered in my mind, I started thinking about the recent prospective clients whom I had asked to come in for a complimentary meeting. One by one, they came in as prospects and left politely as uninterested parties. Maybe, given my lack of success in having them choose to hire me, I was doing something wrong.

In these free meetings–which I schedule to last for an hour but usually go an hour and a half–I go over potential clients’ current financial situation. I also try to help them visualize and crystallize their financial goals. Ninety-nine percent of the time, they’ve never done that.

Was I wrong to focus on trying to provide value to them upfront, even if it meant us not working together? Should I have focused on the “close” instead? Was he right and I wrong? As these questions crowded my brain, as I geared up for a spirited debate, all I could barely whisper was, “Perhaps you’re right.” Point–brokerage executive; goose egg for me.

Here is what I now realize I didn’t say. I should have told the executive about my clients who, in fact, had expressed their comfort in knowing that they could come to me for help and not feel pressured to purchase a product. I had also failed to tell him that by us not focusing on “closing” when serving clients, I could work in better alignment with their goals and in choosing the right planning tools. In other words, I could act in their best interest. These were key points! What happened? I believe I shanked my shot because on some level he did have a point–sort of.

In fact, I think I should change how I work with prospects. I’ll still conduct these complimentary meetings, but I’ll run them in a way that doesn’t take an hour and a half. I’ll try to cut it down to an hour.

As planners, despite our noble reasons for being in the profession, we all have a sales process–either organized or not. Bottom line: We are trying to convince someone that they might benefit later from the advice we provide, and which they have to pay for upfront. It is only later that they begin to see the actual value of the advice and appreciate it.

Until that point, we have to re-convince them to stay the course we set, which means, in some respect, we are “closing” again. I like to think we’re actually “comforting” them, not closing. Always Be Comforting.


Frank Paré is a certified financial planner in private practice in Oakland, California. He and his firm, PF Wealth Management Group, specialize in serving professional women in transition. Frank is currently on the board of the Financial Planning Association and was a recipient of the FPA’s 2011 Heart of Financial Planning award.


Your browser is out of date. Please update your browser at