--- title: Hillary Clinton v. Jeb Bush in 2016 Elections Bad for Millenials description: Americans will be paying off the debts of these two dynasties for a long time, and it's far from clear that the next generation under either Jeb or Hillary would do better. canonical: https://time.com/89899/a-2016-bush-clinton-match-up-would-be-a-lose-lose-for-millenials/ author: Nick Gillespie article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-05-07T04:01:46.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:54:03.183Z article:section: Ideas og:title: A 2016 Bush-Clinton Match-Up? Gag Me. og:description: Americans will be paying off the debts of these two dynasties for a long time, and it's far from clear that the next generation under either Jeb or Hillary would do better. og:url: https://time.com/89899/a-2016-bush-clinton-match-up-would-be-a-lose-lose-for-millenials/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a647e1efcc2b7e7/69868e1f810bbb4201c916b4/52039049.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2396 og:image:height: 1348 og:image:alt: Former US President George H.W. Bush(2nd og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A 2016 Bush-Clinton Match-Up? Gag Me. twitter:description: Americans will be paying off the debts of these two dynasties for a long time, and it's far from clear that the next generation under either Jeb or Hillary would do better. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a647e1efcc2b7e7/69868e1f810bbb4201c916b4/52039049.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A 2016 Bush-Clinton Match-Up? Gag Me. > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6261fda1-04c6-4cfd-b770-ea526243eae3&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6261fda1-04c6-4cfd-b770-ea526243eae3&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=6261fda1-04c6-4cfd-b770-ea526243eae3&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Nick Gillespie](https://time.com/author/nick-gillespie/) ## Nick Gillespie May 7, 2014 4:01 AM UTC  2005 inaugural ceremonies at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. 2005 inaugural ceremonies at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.DON EMMERT—AFP/Getty Images by [Nick Gillespie](https://time.com/author/nick-gillespie/) ## Nick Gillespie May 7, 2014 4:01 AM UTC **Corrected May 8, 2014** For those benighted fools calling for a 2016 presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush, it’s worth underscoring how uninspiring and backward-looking any new showdown would be. The short version? About as memorable and entertaining as [_Grudge Match_](http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/25/movies/grudge-match-stars-sylvester-stallone-and-robert-de-niro.html?%5Fr=0), the recent Sylvester Stallone-Robert DeNiro “comedy” about over-the-hill boxers getting together for one…last…fight that you skipped when it was in theaters and now assiduously avoid on cable. It’s also worth recalling just how underwhelming the first match-up between these two families was. Hampered by the dog-on-leg perspicacity of Ross Perot and a willingness to break his “no new taxes” pledge, George H.W. Bush pulled [just 37.5%](http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=1992) of the vote. Suffering from a zipper problem more expansive than [an El Camino’s astroturf-lined flatbed](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/25/bill-clinton-facts%5Fn%5F3497083.html) and touting such accomplishments as moving Arkansas all the way to [48th out of 50 states](http://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/01/us/1992-campaign-candidate-s-record-despite-improvements-schools-arkansas-are-still.html) in per-pupil education expenditures, Bill Clinton snuck into the White House with just 43% of the vote. (In 1996, despite facing Bob Dole, the least inspiring presidential candidate since the Yippies ran “[Pigasus](http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Top/satirical%5Fcandidates)” in 1968, Clinton still only managed [49%](http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=1996), becoming the only two-term president to never win a majority of the popular vote.) It’s not exactly clear if anybody outside [a preternaturally lazy press corps](http://splicetoday.com/politics-and-media/the-laziness-of-boomer-pundits) and close family members are really pushing for a fourth showdown between the Clintons and the Bushes. “[I hope Jeb runs](http://time.com/84641/jeb-bush-george-2016-presidential-race/),” older brother and former President George W. Bush says. “I think he would be a great president.” It’s true that back in the day many pundits had expected Jeb, not George, to be the next Bush in the White House. Despite success as a large-state governor, George had always come off as Fredo Corleone to Jeb’s Michael. But still: Who listens to the advice from the guy who left office with [the lowest final approval rating ever](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/bushs-final-approval-rating-22-percent/)? When it comes to Hillary, it’s not even clear that she has locked down Bill’s unconditional backing. “I don’t know what Hillary’s going to do, but whatever it is, I expect to support it,” Bill [said last year](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/14/bill-clinton-chelsea-clinton-joke%5Fn%5F3443504.html), the sort of tepid statement that would likely provoke a spousal spat [on the off chance that they ever see each other again](http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/06/09/apart-hillary-clinton-catch-dinner-colombia/). In an interesting new profile, _Politico_ magazine asks, “[What Is Hillary Clinton Afraid Of?](http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/05/hillary-clinton-media-105901.html#.U2ObZ%5FldWSo)” The authors talk a lot about the former Secretary of State’s well-known disdain for the press, and strongly suggest that it’s Clinton’s fear of having to revisit Whitewater, Vince Foster, Webb Hubbell, Travelgate, Troopergate, Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers, our great national conversation about [Peyronie’s disease](http://www.menshealth.com/health/peyronies-disease) and a thousand other barely remembered scandals, slights and humiliations that is keeping her from running for president. Well, there’s also her truly awful record in the Obama administration, too. Nobody can seriously argue that America’s foreign policy and standing in the world soared to new heights on Clinton’s watch. Even her attempt to “reset” relations with Russia was botched (the “reset button” she presented her Russian counterpart actually translated as “[overcharged](http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/03/06/clinton-reset-button-gift-to-russian-fm-gets-lost-in-translation/)”). And as recently released [emails suggest](http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/01/world/email-suggests-white-house-strategy-on-benghazi.html), questions about Benghazi, the highest-profile debacle on Clinton’s watch, are far from dead. So maybe Hillary Clinton is less afraid of the press and more worried about having to defend the rotten record she compiled as part of an administration whose president keeps getting [less and less popular](http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/president-obama-approval-rating-falls-new-poll-article-1.1772756). For his part, former Florida Gov. Jeb is not just fighting “[Bush fatigue](http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/203397-gop-senators-warn-of-bush-fatigue-if-jeb-runs),” an affliction typically reserved for actors in adult movies, but a long layoff from elected office (he stepped down in 2007). Then there’s extreme partisan right-wing outrage over his willingness to defend illegal immigration as “[an act of love](http://reason.com/blog/2014/04/07/jeb-bush-is-right-illegal-immigration-li).” Speaking for many conservatives, Mark Krikorian of _National Review_ [dubbed such talk](http://www.nationalreview.com/article/375230/jebs-gibberish-mark-krikorian) “gibberish” and “horse flop.” Unlike the Democratic field, which seems to be there for Clinton’s taking (though she was in that position in 2008), the GOP field is thick with contenders ranging from Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, Gov. Chris Christie, and former Gov. Mike Huckabee. [Recent polls](http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/poll-gop-presidential-race-wide-open-hillary-clinton-leads-jeb-bush-in-theoretical-matchup/2014/04/29/44c75634-cfb9-11e3-b812-0c92213941f4%5Fstory.html) show Bush in a tie with Sen. Rand Paul but it’s anybody guess how things will shake out. Bush has issues on the family front too. They are different from Clinton’s to be sure, but no less important. His wife [is famously reluctant](http://www.crowleypoliticalreport.com/jeb-bush/) to see him take a shot at the White House, and one of his children has had [drug-related problems](http://nymag.com/news/politics/elections-2012/jeb-bush-2012-10/index4.html) that would certainly get a full airing, especially due to charges of special legal treatment and Bush’s strong anti-drug stance. If it’s far from clear what sort of personal calculus at which Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton may yet arrive, there should be no question that a Clinton-Bush race would be bad for those of us not related to either. America has never been particularly fond of dynasties (apart from psychotics, who _really_ likes the Yankees or the Kennedys?), and representatives of one or both of these families have been running for president basically since at least 1980\. More importantly, their clans have been central players in an increasingly vicious and rancorous era in politics whose chief effect has been to drive a record number of Americans to declare themselves to be [political independents](http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify-independents.aspx). If we’re so concerned about inequality in America, what sort of message does it send to strivers that we can’t go a decade without gifting a Bush or a Clinton free housing, use of a private jet and the mother of all expense accounts? Turning back to such dated and damaged goods would also be yet one more cruel joke that Baby Boomers are playing on Gen Xers and Millennials. The generation born between 1946 and 1964 – Hillary was born in 1947 and Jeb in 1960 – are waging nothing less than class warfare on younger Americans. The crew that grew up singing along to The Who’s “My Generation” (which proclaimed “I hope I die before I get old”) is now refusing to exit the center stage of American life gracefully — or at all. [The old-age entitlements](http://reason.com/archives/2012/07/11/the-real-class-warfare-baby-boomers-vs-y/print) that boomers are beginning to collect en masse will be tapped out way before today’s young workers turn 65, but only after beggaring those same workers through payroll taxes and worse and worse payouts. Obamacare, which caps what older people can be charged for health care, is specifically designed to make young Americans pay more than market rates to subsidize premiums for older folks who are, as a class, far wealthier and able to pay their own way. Under Jeb’s brother and Hillary’s former boss, the Boomer-led government has racked up debt that younger Americans will be paying off for generations if not centuries to come. The fact that more and more young people [are living with their parents](http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/08/01/a-rising-share-of-young-adults-live-in-their-parents-home/) is usually seen as something approaching a tragedy for both kids and parents. You can’t move out if you don’t have a job. Now comes word that Baby Boomers [are refusing to retire](http://www.gallup.com/poll/166952/baby-boomers-reluctant-retire.aspx) because they feel forever young. Can’t the White House at least be one place in America where a younger American can finally move out to? **Correction**: _The original version of this post cited the percent of electoral votes George H.W. Bush won in 1992\. It has been corrected to reflect his popular vote._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/89899/a-2016-bush-clinton-match-up-would-be-a-lose-lose-for-millenials/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/89899/a-2016-bush-clinton-match-up-would-be-a-lose-lose-for-millenials/"},"headline":"A 2016 Bush-Clinton Match-Up? Gag Me.","datePublished":"2014-05-07T04:01:46.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:54:03.183Z","description":"Americans will be paying off the debts of these two dynasties for a long time, and it's far from clear that the next generation under either Jeb or Hillary would do better.","url":"https://time.com/89899/a-2016-bush-clinton-match-up-would-be-a-lose-lose-for-millenials/","keywords":["politics","Hillary Clinton","jeb bush","2016 Campaign"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a647e1efcc2b7e7/69868e1f810bbb4201c916b4/52039049.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nick Gillespie","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/nick-gillespie/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt8a647e1efcc2b7e7/69868e1f810bbb4201c916b4/52039049.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Former US President George H.W. Bush(2nd","caption":"Former US President George H.W. Bush(2nd","creditText":"DON EMMERT—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/89899/a-2016-bush-clinton-match-up-would-be-a-lose-lose-for-millenials/","name":"A 2016 Bush-Clinton Match-Up? Gag Me."}}]}] ```