<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/86415/mark-leibovichs-this-town-is-brilliant-and-fun-and-wrong/" -->

---
title: Mark Leibovich’s This Town Is Brilliant and Fun … And Wrong
description: On Nerdprom Day, Washington is not just about revolving doors and sucking up. It does stuff, too.
canonical: https://time.com/86415/mark-leibovichs-this-town-is-brilliant-and-fun-and-wrong/
author: Michael Grunwald
article:opinion: false
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2014-05-02T21:33:25.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T07:38:09.662Z
article:section: Politics
og:title: Mark Leibovich’s This Town Is Brilliant and Fun … And Wrong
og:description: On Nerdprom Day, Washington is not just about revolving doors and sucking up. It does stuff, too.
og:url: https://time.com/86415/mark-leibovichs-this-town-is-brilliant-and-fun-and-wrong/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production
og:image:width: 1200
og:image:height: 675
og:image:alt: TIME
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Mark Leibovich’s This Town Is Brilliant and Fun … And Wrong
twitter:description: On Nerdprom Day, Washington is not just about revolving doors and sucking up. It does stuff, too.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production
---

# Mark Leibovich's _This Town_ Is Brilliant and Fun … And Wrong

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="ecff27e4-8f01-46cb-a130-c3b1cbaa4ac4" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ecff27e4-8f01-46cb-a130-c3b1cbaa4ac4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ecff27e4-8f01-46cb-a130-c3b1cbaa4ac4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=ecff27e4-8f01-46cb-a130-c3b1cbaa4ac4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ecff27e4-8f01-46cb-a130-c3b1cbaa4ac4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


by 

[Michael Grunwald](https://time.com/author/michael-grunwald/)


## Michael Grunwald


May 2, 2014 9:33 PM UTC

by 

[Michael Grunwald](https://time.com/author/michael-grunwald/)


## Michael Grunwald


May 2, 2014 9:33 PM UTC

In classic _This Town_ fashion, let me start by disclosing that the author of _This Town_, Mark Leibovich, is a friend. He’s a great guy and a great writer. You should buy his new [paperback edition](http://www.amazon.com/This-Town-Parties-Funeral%C2%97Plus-Americas/dp/0399170685/ref=sr%5F1%5F1%5Ftitle%5F1%5Fpap?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1399055625&sr=1-1&keywords=This+Town), which is out this week with a new afterword — an afterword which, incidentally, quotes one of my tweets, in which I described this [hilarious story](http://swampland.time.com/2014/01/08/gates-was-offended-obama-thought-hed-write-a-memoir/) as “the ultimate _This Town_ excerpt,” which was very _This Town_ of me, because at the time I had not yet read _This Town_.

I’ve read it now. It’s as brilliantly reported and sharply written and fun as everyone says it is. But it misses the point of the era it covers.


_This Town_ is an affectionately brutal takedown of Washington’s insider culture. (Leibo’s unique ability to dispense brutality with affection might explain why the city’s establishment types continue to give him such amazing access even though he repeatedly makes them look ridiculous in the New York _Times_.) He tells the story of President Barack Obama’s first term through D.C. players like Tammy Haddad, a party-thrower for the Beltway elite, and Kurt Bardella, a shamelessly self-aggrandizing flack for a Republican congressman. With devastating wit and insight, without partisanship or ideology, Leibovich chronicles a specific subculture that sees national politics as bipartisan entertainment and lucrative business. He savages the self-important, self-satisfied, ready-for-my-closeup slice of Washington that will be on display Saturday night at the annual White House Correspondents Association dinner.


To the extent _This Town_ has a message, it is that despite all of President Obama’s big talk about change, Washington has not changed: “This is the story of _This Town_ in a time of alleged correction.” Leibovich approvingly cites the notion that there are “no Democrats and Republicans in Washington anymore, only millionaires,” describing the crowd he chronicles as “the ultimate Green Party.” He shows how politicians and lobbyists and staffers from both parties end up cashing in, and suggests that the political polarization of Washington is largely a myth. “The city, far from being hopelessly divided, is in fact hopelessly interconnected.”

But it’s not. The conventional wisdom that Washington is hopelessly divided happens to be correct. Ever since Republicans took back the House in 2011, Congress has been unable to pass major legislation, even though leaders of both parties claim to favor immigration reform and tax reform and infrastructure spending. The one exception has been the Budget Control Act, which created the universally unloved “sequester” and other harsh budget cuts, essentially a ransom paid at legislative gunpoint to prevent the GOP’s Tea Party wing from forcing the U.S. government into [default](http://swampland.time.com/2013/03/04/the-sequester-is-a-republican-inflicted-wound/). Sure, Democratic and Republican operatives can come together to launch lobbying firms, and chat amiably in the _Morning Joe_ green room, but partisan gridlock is real and important.

And regardless of your political persuasion, what happened in the first two years of Obama’s first term was just as real and even more important: Change. In his first month in office, the president passed an $800 billion [economic stimulus bill](http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2013826,00.html%20), which helped prevent a second Great Depression, launched a clean energy revolution, and transformed the country in so many ways that — _This Town_ alert— [I wrote a book about it](http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Deal-Hidden-Change/dp/1451642334/ref=tmm%5Fpap%5Ftitle%5F0). Then came Obamacare, the most ambitious social welfare legislation since the Great Society. The President also signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reforms into law, the most sweeping overhaul of financial regulations since the Great Depression.

The fact that some Obamaworld figures went on to exploit their Change We Can Believe In credentials to make big bucks, while definitely worth exploring, matters significantly less than the change they produced for — or, if you prefer, inflicted upon — the American people. And the foibles of a repulsive Republican flack, while amusing, mattered less than the transformation of the Republican Party, which has embraced the anti-government, anti-science, anti-compromise ethos of its Tea Party base, and has marched in lockstep against all those Obama initiatives.


_This Town_ barely mentions those dramatic policy milestones. At one point, during a four-page skewering of the eminently skewerable senator-turned-lobbyist Chris Dodd, Leibovich notes in passing that Dodd “played key roles” in health reform and “a major banking bill,” presumably Dodd-Frank. He also observes that even though Obama “engineered passage of historic legislation, rescued the economy from collapse, and was killing terrorists like flies,” Washington elites tended to focus on his messaging problems, blathering about why he had “lost the narrative.” But that’s about it. Substance is mostly an ironic backdrop in _This Town_, illustrating how political types don’t care about substance. They prefer gilded political conventions with fancy food, ice scultpures and free aromatherapy. “Also,” Leibovich snarks, “lots of panel discussions to remind us that this is all about issues.”

Leibo isn’t interested in those issues, either. That’s OK; not all of us are policy dorks, and he’s got the keenest eye of any political reporter in the city. But _This Town_ purports to tell the story of Washington during a “time of alleged correction,” and it misses the correction, the transformation of federal policies regarding the economy, foreign affairs, health care, energy, education, and much more. It’s like a book about the moon mission that focuses on the sketchy endorsement deals the astronauts signed when they got back. Or, if you prefer, it’s like a book about the Titanic that focuses on the lame on-board entertainment. It exposes some things about Washington that never change, but misses the change hidden in plain view.


I don’t think I’ve ever met Tammy Haddad, although I think I might have gone to one of her parties. I’ve definitely never gone to the WHCA dinner. I don’t live in Washington anymore, and I don’t miss that suck-up scene, the power groupies, the climbers, the spinners, the hacks. But _This Town_ is unfair to a lot of that town.

“You still hear the term ‘public service’ thrown around, but often with irony and full knowledge that ‘self-service’ is now the real insider play,” Leibovich writes.

Perhaps, but Washington insiders pushed a health care bill that is helping millions of the uninsured. Washington insiders passed a stimulus bill that helped keep millions out of poverty. Washington insiders passed financial regulations designed to prevent another financial cataclysm. And while I’ve been critical of [cynical GOP obstructionism](http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,2122776,00.html%20), some Washington insiders on the Republican side fought back because they genuinely believed those policies would hurt the country. Sure, the revolving door is real, and there are too many influence-peddlers and self-dealers in Washington, but there are also a lot of nerds in who care primarily about the city’s outsized impact on America. Leibo probably won’t see too many of them at NerdProm.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/86415/mark-leibovichs-this-town-is-brilliant-and-fun-and-wrong/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/86415/mark-leibovichs-this-town-is-brilliant-and-fun-and-wrong/"},"headline":"Mark Leibovich's This Town Is Brilliant and Fun … And Wrong","datePublished":"2014-05-02T21:33:25.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T07:38:09.662Z","description":"On Nerdprom Day, Washington is not just about revolving doors and sucking up. It does stuff, too.","url":"https://time.com/86415/mark-leibovichs-this-town-is-brilliant-and-fun-and-wrong/","keywords":["republicans","Barack Obama","Washington","Dinner","democrat"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Michael Grunwald","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/michael-grunwald/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/86415/mark-leibovichs-this-town-is-brilliant-and-fun-and-wrong/","name":"Mark Leibovich's This Town Is Brilliant and Fun … And Wrong"}}]}]
```