--- title: Study: Next-Generation Biofuels Worse for Environment than Gasoline description: Environmentalists have long worried about biofuels like corn ethanol. But now a study shows that even advanced biofuels may hurt the climate canonical: https://time.com/70110/biofuels-advanced-environment-energy/ author: Bryan Walsh article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-04-21T16:11:03.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T07:24:30.446Z article:section: Science og:title: Advanced Biofuels Could Be Worse for the Climate Than Gasoline og:description: New study casts doubts on the environmental benefits of next-generation ethanol og:url: https://time.com/70110/biofuels-advanced-environment-energy/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt59e73e9ed274a7ba/69868ba055a859d6faa806b2/140421-biofuels.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1500 og:image:height: 844 og:image:alt: 140421-biofuels og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Advanced Biofuels Could Be Worse for the Climate Than Gasoline twitter:description: New study casts doubts on the environmental benefits of next-generation ethanol twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt59e73e9ed274a7ba/69868ba055a859d6faa806b2/140421-biofuels.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Even Advanced Biofuels May Not Be So Green > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4274c128-a6c2-494e-9d7a-4a4e0c81ecb7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4274c128-a6c2-494e-9d7a-4a4e0c81ecb7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4274c128-a6c2-494e-9d7a-4a4e0c81ecb7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Bryan Walsh](https://time.com/author/bryan-walsh/)  ## Bryan Walsh Apr 21, 2014 4:11 PM UTC  New research shows that next-generation biofuels made from corn waste aren't so green New research shows that next-generation biofuels made from corn waste aren't so green Photographer's Choice via Getty Images  by [Bryan Walsh](https://time.com/author/bryan-walsh/)  ## Bryan Walsh Apr 21, 2014 4:11 PM UTC Back in 2008, TIME published a controversial cover story with a simple line: [The Clean Energy Myth](http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1725975,00.html). TIME’s Michael Grunwald made a damning case against the ethanol industry, arguing that the massive subsidies for biofuels intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by cutting demand for oil actually had the opposite environmental effect: --- > “” --- The years since have seen [rounds of opposing studies](http://science.time.com/2012/12/17/betting-on-hunger-is-financial-speculation-to-blame-for-high-food-prices/) on the environmental effects of bioenergy, even as the amount of biofuel produced has continued to rise. The U.S. is [expected](http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/04/20/its-final-corn-ethanol-is-of-no-use/) to use almost 5 billion bushels of corn to produce over 13 billion gallons of ethanol this year, thanks chiefly to government mandates. But research has also [linked](http://science.time.com/2011/02/14/energy-why-biofuels-help-push-up-food-prices/) the use of crops like corn and soybeans as fuel to the rise in global food prices in recent years. (In 2013, four of every ten bushels of corn producing in the U.S. went to ethanol, almost as much as was used to feed livestock.) And improving gas mileage and rising production of domestic oil—[thanks to the recent shale boom](http://time.com/5922/fracking-energy-boom-natural-gas-geopolitics-iran/)—have undercut the argument that biofuels are needed for energy independence. Still, biofuel advocates have [always pointed](http://nation.time.com/2013/10/11/next-generation-biofuels-are-inching-towards-reality-gallon-by-gallon/) to the development of second-generation biofuels that will get around some of those environmental drawbacks by using the waste products of crops like corn or by tapping non-food plants like switchgrass or wood chips. Though those next-generation cellulosic fuels have proven difficult to develop on a commercial scale—it’s been chemically challenging to tap the energy locked in cellulose—there has been some progress recently, with major cellulosic ethanol plants from companies like DuPont and Abengoa Bioenergy. But now it turns out that even next-generation biofuels may be worse for the climate than the fossil fuel-based sources they’re meant to replace. A new federally-funded [study](http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2187.html) published in _Nature Climate Change_ has found that biofuels made from corn waste release 7% more greenhouse gases over the short term than gasoline. That’s because by using corn waste like stalks and cobs as a fuel source, farmers aren’t letting the plant residue remain in their fields, when over time it would enrich the soil with carbon. The carbon gained by swapping out gasoline with next-generation ethanol made from corn waste doesn’t make up for the additional carbon lost by the soil. While next-generation biofuels are better for the climate over the long term, the study concludes they’re not green enough to meet federal standards for subsidies, which require cellulosic ethanol to produce at least 60% less carbon than gasoline. And without those subsidies—which amount to $1 per gallon—the nascent advanced biofuel industry could be smothered in the crib. That should be extremely worrying to the biofuel industry, which has been counting on the growth of advanced biofuels as subsidies for corn ethanol are phased out. The Renewable Fuels Association—an ethanol trade group—was [quick to criticize](http://www.ethanolrfa.org/news/entry/new-stover-study-is-deeply-flawed-and-out-of-step-with-current-science/) the _Nature Climate Change_ study, noting that earlier research concluded that corn residue could be removed for fuel without reducing the amount of carbon in soil. And Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) spokesperson Liz Purchia [said](http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US%5FBIOFUELS%5FGLOBAL%5FWARMING?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-04-21-04-02-59) in a statement that the study “does not provide useful information to the life-cycle greenhouse gas emission from corn stover ethanol.” University of Nebraska Professor Adam Liska, who led the _Nature Climate Change_ study, noted that using some of the corn residue to produce electricity—where it could help replace far dirtier coal—could make next-generation biofuels greener. So could the adoption of other cellulosic sources, or even algae. But most of the next-generation biofuel plants that are close to completion will be using corn residue as an early fuel source. The reality is that the biofuel industry is in trouble. For the first time ever, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change explicitly [warned](http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/biofuels-might-hold-back-progress-combating-climate-change/) about the environmental risks of uncontrolled biofuel development in its most recent report on global warming. Given the political power of the farmers who directly benefit from ethanol subsidies—and the paucity of other immediate options to reduce the climate impact of transportation—biofuels aren’t going away. But the industry has a long way to go before it can prove that biofuels—even next-generation options—aren’t a clean energy myth. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/70110/biofuels-advanced-environment-energy/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/70110/biofuels-advanced-environment-energy/"},"headline":"Even Advanced Biofuels May Not Be So Green","datePublished":"2014-04-21T16:11:03.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T07:24:30.446Z","description":"Environmentalists have long worried about biofuels like corn ethanol. But a new study shows that even advanced biofuels, which use waste from crops like corn to make fuel, may hurt the climate","url":"https://time.com/70110/biofuels-advanced-environment-energy/","keywords":["Environment","Food","climate change","global warming","carbon emissions","Oil","Farming","fracking","Corn","EPA"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt59e73e9ed274a7ba/69868ba055a859d6faa806b2/140421-biofuels.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Bryan Walsh","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/bryan-walsh/"}],"articleSection":"Science","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt59e73e9ed274a7ba/69868ba055a859d6faa806b2/140421-biofuels.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"140421-biofuels","caption":"Corn waste used for biofuels","creditText":"Photographer's Choice via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/science/","name":"Science"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/environment/","name":"Environment"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/70110/biofuels-advanced-environment-energy/","name":"Even Advanced Biofuels May Not Be So Green"}}]}] ```