--- title: A Revolutionary Suggestion for Word of the Year: Listen description: In a year of shouting and partisanship and growing division, Nancy Gibbs makes the case for listening—which has become a revolutionary act canonical: https://time.com/5482024/listen-word-of-the-year-nancy-gibbs/ author: Nancy Gibbs article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-12-18T19:30:11.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T11:49:55.839Z article:section: Ideas og:title: A Revolutionary Suggestion for Word of the Year: 'Listen' og:description: An act of courage, in a year of shouting and division og:url: https://time.com/5482024/listen-word-of-the-year-nancy-gibbs/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7bbe2d4faea2ec7/6989415c8fd2eeadc835d5f2/GettyImages-482067953.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: Listening Word of the Year og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A Revolutionary Suggestion for Word of the Year: 'Listen' twitter:description: An act of courage, in a year of shouting and division twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7bbe2d4faea2ec7/6989415c8fd2eeadc835d5f2/GettyImages-482067953.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A Revolutionary Suggestion for Word of the Year: _Listen_ > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bbfdca94-032d-42ba-8e3b-35ed39c8ee14&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=bbfdca94-032d-42ba-8e3b-35ed39c8ee14&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=bbfdca94-032d-42ba-8e3b-35ed39c8ee14&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.  by [Nancy Gibbs](https://time.com/author/nancy-gibbs/)  ## Nancy Gibbs Dec 18, 2018 7:30 PM UTC  Futuristic grunge background with ear. Vector illustration Futuristic grunge background with ear. Vector illustration Artur Aliev—Getty Images  by [Nancy Gibbs](https://time.com/author/nancy-gibbs/)  ## Nancy Gibbs Dec 18, 2018 7:30 PM UTC My word of the year is _listen_. It’s one of those words whose meaning is in its music. Listen is a quiet word, that half swallowed L and diffident I and softly hissing S. It defies the clamorous words it absorbs, the words that have defined this year, the shouts and roars, the bray and bluster. Listening is hard when the sounds around us grow mean and ugly. And listening takes particular courage in divisive times. [Voters in the midterm elections](http://time.com/5447861/9-lessons-2018-midterm-elections/) were united around almost nothing other than how divided we are; 76 percent say we are coming apart, versus 9 percent who see us coming together. As we separate, we shout to be heard across the divide, which grows tiresome, and so we just stop talking to each other altogether. Listening becomes a form of subversion, a rebellion against the tribe. And so we refuse. We’ve seen this on campus, when [college students](http://time.com/5369429/michelle-obama-on-college/) shout down speakers whose views they reject. We saw it when _New Yorker_ editor David Remnick could no longer justify interviewing Steve Bannon onstage at the magazine’s festival as other speakers threatened to pull out and sink the whole event. Even in more intimate settings, hostility to the very act of listening grows. Fifteen years ago, Dave Isay founded [StoryCorps](http://time.com/4155074/911-september-11-terrorist-attacks-oral-history/), the oral history project that records and archives people’s narratives at the Library of Congress. It is now the largest collection of human voices ever gathered. This national treasure, with close to half a million people taking part, won its founder a MacArthur “genius” grant, resulted in a TED Talk, and earned him multiple Peabody Awards. Its goal: “to remind one another of our shared humanity… and to teach the value of listening.” This fall, Isay launched a new initiative, One Small Step. Instead of recording the conversations of families and friends, it captures an encounter between strangers from opposite sides of the political divide. The mission this time was “to remind us that we have more in common than divides us and that treating those with whom we disagree with decency and respect is essential to a functioning democracy.” What works in the recording booth—human moments of discovery and depth—may inspire some people but infuriate others. It’s as though, Isay tells me, some people can only hear voices they disagree with through the prism of contempt. “There is no common ground between fascism and democracy,” argued one critic of a conversation that aired on NPR. Another listener said they rejected the “gaslighting. I refuse to be friends with someone who is content, complacent, ignorant, or who rationalizes the intentional cruelty that the Republican Party champions.” Even as I write “listener,” I stop short. Social scientists who study how our beliefs are formed find that in politically freighted conversations, we may keep listening but stop _hearing_ once our settled views are challenged, our alarms tripped. Just giving people more information, whether about climate change or crime rates or vaccines, does not pave a road to common ground; if anything, the opposite is true. [Partisanship](http://time.com/5386443/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-partisan-protest/) disrupts understanding, blocks reasoning, exalts loyalty over logic. All of which makes listening even harder. And more essential. What an insidious trap, when experts ask that we trust their finding about the failures of our critical faculties. It’s just all around so much more comfortable to be right all the time and leave it at that. Except we risk growing dumber and meaner, less interesting and certainly less engaged if we stop listening, even—or maybe especially—to the people we don’t want to hear. As we returned to campus this fall, Doug Elmendorf, the dean of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, where I teach, made the health of our [civil discourse](http://time.com/longform/both-sides-gun-control/) a priority inside and outside the classroom. That includes wrestling with ideas we find disturbing, and then debating, honestly and rigorously, policy proposals that weigh values differently. “Courage is not just about standing up for what you believe,” Elmendorf tells students. “Sometimes courage is about sitting down and listening to what you may not initially believe.” Which is not to say that if we all just listened more, our wounds would heal and our conflicts end. Nor does it mean abandoning our values; it’s a strategic reminder of the value of humility. “It’s always wise to seek the truth in our opponents’ error, and the error in our own truth,” theologian Reinhold Niebuhr said. Listening, closely and bravely, to an opposing view deepens our insight and sharpens our arguments—especially in our public life, as we figure out what a wise and just immigration policy might look like, or the smart balance between our values and our interests in the Middle East. It’s long past time that we quiet our animal spirits. This has been a fierce year of public battle, political fights that have infected our friendships and family, degraded our discourse, defaced institutions, disturbed our peace. I grew up in Quaker schools, which included regular silent meetings. This did not come naturally to nine-year-olds. But I found then, and need to be reminded now, that we can’t hear the soft, sane voice inside us if we’re talking all the time, and certainly not if we’re shouting. Instead, let’s listen. Invite surprise. Invest in subtlety. And surrender to silence once in a while. _This piece was co-published with Medium, as part of_ [_its Words That Matter 2018 series_](https://medium.com/wordsthatmatter)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5482024/listen-word-of-the-year-nancy-gibbs/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5482024/listen-word-of-the-year-nancy-gibbs/"},"headline":"A Revolutionary Suggestion for Word of the Year: Listen","datePublished":"2018-12-18T19:30:11.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T11:49:55.839Z","description":"An act of courage, in a year of shouting and division","url":"https://time.com/5482024/listen-word-of-the-year-nancy-gibbs/","keywords":["politics","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7bbe2d4faea2ec7/6989415c8fd2eeadc835d5f2/GettyImages-482067953.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nancy Gibbs","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/nancy-gibbs/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltd7bbe2d4faea2ec7/6989415c8fd2eeadc835d5f2/GettyImages-482067953.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Listening Word of the Year","caption":"","creditText":"Artur Aliev—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5482024/listen-word-of-the-year-nancy-gibbs/","name":"A Revolutionary Suggestion for Word of the Year: Listen"}}]}] ```