--- title: Why We Keeping Ignoring Climate Change Warnings description: A new U.N. report should sound alarms that climate change is far closer than most people realize. It probably won't. canonical: https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/ author: Jeffrey Kluger article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-10-08T20:48:48.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:03:58.485Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why We Keep Ignoring Even the Most Dire Climate Change Warnings og:description: A new U.N. report should sound alarms that climate change is far closer than most people realize. It probably won't. og:url: https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta2fd33d59c24a798/69893c1a7cdbac9854d5e1f4/climatechangeflood.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3600 og:image:height: 2025 og:image:alt: Ellicott City faces another Flash Flood Emergency after drenching rain for several hours og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why We Keep Ignoring Even the Most Dire Climate Change Warnings twitter:description: A new U.N. report should sound alarms that climate change is far closer than most people realize. It probably won't. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta2fd33d59c24a798/69893c1a7cdbac9854d5e1f4/climatechangeflood.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why We Keep Ignoring Even the Most Dire Climate Change Warnings > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=fa8436f1-6826-4f8f-a1fe-0dfee2bcbcc7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=fa8436f1-6826-4f8f-a1fe-0dfee2bcbcc7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=fa8436f1-6826-4f8f-a1fe-0dfee2bcbcc7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: TIME Ideas: Science Is Too Important To Be Silenced In The Trump Era [Watch (HLS stream): TIME Ideas: Science Is Too Important To Be Silenced In The Trump Era](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4dGVBI9w.m3u8) (2:17)  _Published 2018-10-10. TIME spoke with Dr. Jonathan Foley, an environmental scientist and outspoken defender of science in the age of Trump._  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Oct 8, 2018 8:48 PM UTC  ELLICOTT CITY, MD - MAY 27: Cars are stranded in a parking lot during a flash flood May 27, 2018 in Ellicott City, MD. This comes two years after another flash flood devastated the historic downtown. ELLICOTT CITY, MD - MAY 27: Cars are stranded in a parking lot during a flash flood May 27, 2018 in Ellicott City, MD. This comes two years after another flash flood devastated the historic downtown. The Washington Post;The Washington Post/Getty Images  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Oct 8, 2018 8:48 PM UTC You’d think the end of the world would be enough to get us scared. Humans have always been an exceedingly risk-averse species—which is how we came to survive as a species at all. If there are lions on one part of the savannah, we go to another. If crocodiles keep coming out of the river, we fish somewhere else. So when it comes to the loss of the entire planet, well, we ought to take action. And yet we don’t; we never do. That odd contradiction is on display again, in the wake of an [announcement by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change](http://www.ipcc.ch/) that a catastrophe is nigh—that that distant future of an Earth best by floods, droughts, wildfires and typhoons isn’t distant anymore, but as little as 12 years away. Unless we act dramatically and fast, the report says, by 2030 temperatures will have risen to 2.7º F (1.5º C) above the average of the pre-industrial era—the threshold that has long been cited as the tipping point for calamity. And while the announcement has been reported widely, the public reaction—again, as always—has been _meh_. Volumes of research have been published over the decades trying to explain how and why we so often miscalculate risk—over-preparing for things that are not likely to hurt us and ignoring or shrugging off the things that are. The bad news for environmental scientists and policymakers trying to wake the public up to the perils we face is that climate change checks almost every one of our ignore-the-problem boxes. For starters, it lacks the absolutely critical component—the “me” component. “Nobody wakes up in the morning and looks at the longterm climate forecast,” says David Ropeik, an international consultant on risk perception and communication, formerly with the Harvard School of Public Health. “They ask what the weather is today, where I live, and how it’s going to affect _me_.” That’s sensible as far as it goes. Immediate concerns will always trump eventual concerns—which is one more trick of species survival. But when it comes to climate change, even when we do try to think long-term, a lot of things get in the way. Paramount among them is that climate action requires a lot of right-now sacrifice for a down-the-line payoff. “When it comes to acting on problems, the lure of our current comforts and conveniences will often cause us to act contrary to our values,” says Paul Slovic, University or Oregon psychologist and the president of Decision Research, and international group of investigators who study decision-making and risk. “If we think the consequences are far in the future, we tend to discount the risk. People just aren’t going to inconvenience themselves unless they’re forced to.” Indeed, even when the risk is not far in the future—when, say, a hurricane is cannonballing toward the coast and the government orders an evacuation—plenty of people still don’t budge. Here, what’s known as the optimism bias is at work. Other people may need to make tracks, but your storm windows are top-of-the-line or your house is on slightly higher ground, so why get off the couch? If we find it so easy to talk ourselves out of acting in the face of a storm that’s just days away, a disaster that’s many years away doesn’t stand a chance. We establish that kind of distance from risk not just temporally but geographically and culturally. If you live in an inland region, well, the floods are going to inundate the suckers on the coast, not you. If you live on the coast, it’s the _south_ coast that’s going to get hit and you live north. And developed nations like the U.S. are typically going to be able to deal with climate instability better than developing ones, which allows us to conclude that while disasters happen elsewhere they don’t happen here. “The question is often, ‘Do I feel vulnerable?'” says Slovic. “For the most part we don’t and that shapes our behavior.” Even when we do try to personalize things, we have a hard time doing it. We can picture what it would be like to get eaten by a shark, Ropeik says, or die in a mass shooting or an airplane crash. That leads us to over-prepare for those risks—arming teachers, avoiding the beach, driving instead of flying even though driving is manifestly more dangerous. “But if you ask even the most devout climate change believers how they think it’s going to affect them, they often can’t quite describe it,” he says. If it’s hard to picture, it’s easy to ignore. Finally, there’s a sense of futility—the inefficacy factor, as risk experts put it. Climate change is a huge problem—arguably the biggest of all problems—and that makes individual action seem awfully pointless. “We reason that we can curtail things we want to do—like driving or flying,” says Slovic, “but if other people aren’t going to do it, it’s not going to make any difference.” Of course, every great human enterprise has called on people not to do things they want to do or to do things they don’t—paying taxes, volunteering for military service, tolerating rationing in time of war. None of it is fun, none of it is easy, but all of it has helped ensure the success of the larger human project and the survival of the next generations. If we can’t bestir ourselves now, in the face of yet another alarming report from the climate change scientists, we’re going to owe those generations an explanation—and an apology. ## Transcript [ MUSIC ] People talk about a kind of war on science, I don't sometimes like that word, but it is accurate, unfortunately. This administration has targeted certain areas of science, especially around the environment, especially around public health. Things that clearly have a kind of economic, financial, and political undertone to them, that favors some people who supported this administration. And that's unfortunate, because that means it's attacking things that are really protecting all Americans and protecting the most vulnerable. Protecting our environment, protecting our future and those things are crucial to the country's success [ UNKNOWN ] in the long term. [ MUSIC ] Interestingly, you don't see the scientists in the Pentagon who work on new missile systems being censored, they're fine. They're travel expenses are covered, everybody's good. But when suddenly it's about climate change or health, or other contentious issues, suddenly they're not allowed to speak. Not allowed to go to conferences. And there's really well documented evidence that a third of the scientists of the EPA, half the scientists of the Park Service, were told not to use the word climate change anymore. That's crazy! Climate is changing, it's like not using the word gravity or something. That's crazy to do that. I don't really care what kind of politics you have or what you listen to on the radio. I don't know a single American who stands up and says, I am pro censorship. I think other voices should always be silenced. I don't know anybody who truly believes that. And so I think when we kinda remember our roots as an American people Things like censoring people who you find inconvenient. Nobody really believes that's a good idea. And when you see science being silenced, you know that that's a bad idea. So scientists are really concerned but, if you really listen to them, they're not concerned about their grant dollars or about their Labs they were talking about the work that they do. That they want to do to serve the world around them. This is why people go into science this is why people become medical researchers, environmental scientists, people who work at the EPA. They're not doing this for money are you kidding me. They're doing it because they care. They do it because they want to serve their country and that's the best way they can do that. [ MUSIC ] [ BLANK_AUDIO ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/"},"headline":"Why We Keep Ignoring Even the Most Dire Climate Change Warnings","datePublished":"2018-10-08T20:48:48.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:03:58.485Z","description":"A new U.N. report should sound alarms that climate change is far closer than most people realize. It probably won't.","url":"https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/","keywords":["climate change","Environment","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta2fd33d59c24a798/69893c1a7cdbac9854d5e1f4/climatechangeflood.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey Kluger","jobTitle":"Editor at Large","url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta2fd33d59c24a798/69893c1a7cdbac9854d5e1f4/climatechangeflood.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Ellicott City faces another Flash Flood Emergency after drenching rain for several hours","caption":"Ellicott City faces another Flash Flood Emergency after drenching rain for several hours","creditText":"The Washington Post;The Washington Post/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/climate-change/","name":"climate change"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/","name":"Why We Keep Ignoring Even the Most Dire Climate Change Warnings"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"TIME Ideas: Science Is Too Important To Be Silenced In The Trump Era","description":"TIME spoke with Dr. Jonathan Foley, an environmental scientist and outspoken defender of science in the age of Trump.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/4dGVBI9w/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2018-10-10T16:57:21.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4dGVBI9w.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/","duration":"PT2M17S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```