--- title: John Paul Stevens Says Brett Kavanaugh Is Not Qualified for Supreme Court description: Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens sid he no longer believes Brett Kavanaugh is qualified for a seat on the Supreme Court canonical: https://time.com/5416084/john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh/ author: Katie Reilly article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-10-04T22:12:08.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T21:38:51.160Z article:section: Politics og:title: Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Says Brett Kavanaugh Should Not Be Confirmed og:description: "I feel his performance in the hearings ultimately changed my mind" og:url: https://time.com/5416084/john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7c5ae8e8ffa6ac5d/69893be897cdffa9dd6b6665/supreme-court-john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4200 og:image:height: 2363 og:image:alt: Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Testifies To Senate Committee On Campaign Finance og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Says Brett Kavanaugh Should Not Be Confirmed twitter:description: "I feel his performance in the hearings ultimately changed my mind" twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7c5ae8e8ffa6ac5d/69893be897cdffa9dd6b6665/supreme-court-john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Says Brett Kavanaugh Should Not Be Confirmed: 'Pay Attention' > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4f10efd0-a923-4a82-9dc9-24643fd04d94&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=4f10efd0-a923-4a82-9dc9-24643fd04d94&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=4f10efd0-a923-4a82-9dc9-24643fd04d94&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Katie Reilly](https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/)  ## Katie Reilly Oct 4, 2018 10:12 PM UTC  Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens testifies before the Senate Committee on Campaign Finance on Capitol Hill on April 30, 2014 in Washington, D.C. Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens testifies before the Senate Committee on Campaign Finance on Capitol Hill on April 30, 2014 in Washington, D.C. Allison Shelley/Getty Images  by [Katie Reilly](https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/)  ## Katie Reilly Oct 4, 2018 10:12 PM UTC Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens [said Thursday](https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/retired-supreme-court-justice-kavanaugh-does-not-belong-high-court/aXEO6XTeiF8OECimtNxpjJ/) that he no longer believes [Brett Kavanaugh](http://time.com/5409739/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-justice-process/) is qualified for a seat on the Supreme Court because of his performance during last week’s confirmation hearings. During hearings over a sexual assault allegation against him, Kavanaugh lashed out at what he called a [“calculated and orchestrated political hit,](http://time.com/5409283/brett-kavanaugh-opening-statement/) fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election,” claiming that [“revenge on behalf of the Clintons”](http://time.com/5413906/kavanaugh-clinton-fraught-history/) had played a role. Democrats and other critics argued that Kavanaugh’s testimony raised questions about [his temperament and political bias](http://time.com/5412701/democrats-brett-kavanaugh-temperament/), with some arguing it could be disqualifying. “I think there’s merit to that criticism and I think the senators should really pay attention that,” Stevens said at an event in Boca Raton, Fla., on Thursday, [according to the Palm Beach _Post_](https://www.mypalmbeachpost.com/news/retired-supreme-court-justice-kavanaugh-does-not-belong-high-court/aXEO6XTeiF8OECimtNxpjJ/). > [](https://twitter.com/cspan/status/1047975997075849216) Stevens, a Republican who was appointed by GOP President Gerald Ford, often issued liberal opinions during his time on the high court. He [signed a dissenting opinion](https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/00-949P.ZD) in the _Bush v. Gore_ case, in which the majority ruled to settle the 2000 election recount dispute in favor of George W. Bush. In March, after the Parkland shooting, Stevens [wrote a New York _Times_ column](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/27/opinion/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment.html) calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment. As the _Post_ noted, Stevens previously praised Kavanaugh in his 2014 book [_Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution_](https://books.google.com/books/about/Six%5FAmendments.html?id=gbtXAgAAQBAJ). “At that time, I thought (Kavanaugh) had the qualifications for the Supreme Court should he be selected,” Stevens said Thursday, according to the _Post_. “I’ve changed my views for reasons that have no relationship to his intellectual ability … I feel his performance in the hearings ultimately changed my mind.” Stevens is the first retired or serving Supreme Court justice to comment on the controversy over Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Retired Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy, whose spot Kavanaugh has been nominated to fill, declined to comment on the hearings at an event last week, the [Associated Press reported](https://www.sacbee.com/news/state/california/article219216960.html). Kavanaugh’s confirmation [will come down to a few key Senators](http://time.com/5415238/fbi-report-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court/) ahead of a highly anticipated cloture vote on Friday. But Stevens’ comments quickly garnered attention Thursday. “I agree with Justice Stevens. Judge Kavanaugh’s partisanship and temperament would do lasting damage to the credibility of the Court — an often overlooked consequence should he be confirmed,” tweeted Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. > [](https://twitter.com/SenatorLeahy/status/1047942721057542145) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5416084/john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5416084/john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh/"},"headline":"Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Says Brett Kavanaugh Should Not Be Confirmed: 'Pay Attention'","datePublished":"2018-10-04T22:12:08.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T21:38:51.160Z","description":"\"I feel his performance in the hearings ultimately changed my mind\"","url":"https://time.com/5416084/john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh/","keywords":["Supreme Court","Congress","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7c5ae8e8ffa6ac5d/69893be897cdffa9dd6b6665/supreme-court-john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Katie Reilly","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/katie-reilly/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7c5ae8e8ffa6ac5d/69893be897cdffa9dd6b6665/supreme-court-john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Testifies To Senate Committee On Campaign Finance","caption":"Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Testifies To Senate Committee On Campaign Finance","creditText":"Allison Shelley/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/supreme-court/","name":"Supreme Court"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5416084/john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh/","name":"Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Says Brett Kavanaugh Should Not Be Confirmed: 'Pay Attention'"}}]}] ```