--- title: White House Squashes Navy Proposal to Scrap USS George Washington description: Under congressional pressure, Obama decides to keep 11 carriers sailing, at least past the shoals of the midterm elections canonical: https://time.com/5325/uss-george-washington-carrier-white-house/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-02-07T16:24:02.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T06:19:46.965Z article:section: Politics og:title: White House Squashes Navy Proposal to Scrap USS George Washington og:description: Under congressional pressure, Obama decides to keep 11 carriers sailing, at least past the shoals of the midterm elections og:url: https://time.com/5325/uss-george-washington-carrier-white-house/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltedad528d2311e3ca/698681fe06f2c1ed7f32d7e6/154636782.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3005 og:image:height: 1690 og:image:alt: PHILIPPINES - US - MLITARY - DIPLOMACY og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: White House Squashes Navy Proposal to Scrap USS George Washington twitter:description: Under congressional pressure, Obama decides to keep 11 carriers sailing, at least past the shoals of the midterm elections twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltedad528d2311e3ca/698681fe06f2c1ed7f32d7e6/154636782.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # White House Punts on Retiring Aircraft Carrier > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=dc6d7fea-57cc-4bd8-8fc3-41837b744ff1&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=dc6d7fea-57cc-4bd8-8fc3-41837b744ff1&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=dc6d7fea-57cc-4bd8-8fc3-41837b744ff1&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Feb 7, 2014 4:24 PM UTC  The USS George Washington in the Philippines in 2012. The USS George Washington in the Philippines in 2012. NOEL CELIS / AFP / Getty Images by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Feb 7, 2014 4:24 PM UTC The news that the White House is abandoning plans to authorize the retirement the aircraft carrier [**_USS George Washington_**](http://www.gw.navy.mil/) is the latest example of the nation’s no-brain, no-money defense strategy. The _Wall Street Journal_ [**reported**](http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304450904579365130060602564?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304450904579365130060602564.html) Friday that the Obama administration vetoed scrapping the flattop after lawmakers [**urged**](http://forbes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=369116) it be kept steaming. The White House wants to avoid a political fight on Capitol Hill, where there are concerns that Congress would fight the retirement and open up Democrats to “weak on defense” charges in the midterm elections this fall. The issue surrounding the _GW_ is whether or not the Navy should invest almost $5 billion to refuel its nuclear reactor—something that happens once in a carrier’s half-century life—if there isn’t going to be enough money to keep her sailing after. For now, it appears that the White House and the Navy have simply decided to refrain from making a decision on the refueling. Given projected levels of defense spending, nearly all experts maintain that the U.S. Navy won’t be able to keep its 11-carrier fleet sailing. Any efforts to save the carriers, they suggest, will lead to an increasingly unbalanced force. Retiring the _GW_, which was commissioned in 1992, early—while building a pair of new $20 billion (including planes) _Ford_\-class carriers—suggests the scope of the problem. “Do we really need 11 carrier strike groups for another 30 years, when no other country has more than one?” then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates asked in May 2010\. Four days later, after his remark sounded general quarters throughout the fleet, Gates backed down. “I may want to change things, but I’m not crazy,” he said. “I’m not going to cut a carrier, OK?” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel warned last summer that carrier cuts might make sense. “We would trade away size for high-end capability,” he suggested, following a review of the Pentagon’s future last summer. “This would… reduce the number of carrier strike groups from 11 to eight or nine.” This week, in a budget-cutting drill divorced from politics, each of four respected Washington think tanks said the carrier fleet should [**shrink**](http://www.navytimes.com/article/20140206/NEWS05/302060005/Analysts-U-S-should-cut-carriers-buy-subs-and-work-with-allies)**,** at least temporarily, by two to four hulls. But it seems that high-profile defense items are immune to cuts, which is only going to lead to further budget trouble down the road. The top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee on Thursday detailed the paralysis that now passes for defense-spending strategy. “We are going to have to do some series of things that previously were unimaginable, OK?” Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said. “So we’re going to have to re-adjust our imagination. We’ve simply chosen not to. … We need a strategic response in Congress other than just ‘no, don’t cut that,’… no BRAC \[base closures\]; [no changes to the Guard and Reserve](http://breakingdefense.com/2014/01/budgets-betrayal-national-guard-fights-to-keep-apache-gunships/); no shrinkage of [the size of the Navy](http://breakingdefense.com/2014/01/the-navys-carrier-crunch-even-without-budget-cuts-deployments-will-drop/).” Every day that passes with a military that isn’t rationally calibrated to the dollars coming in is a weaker force. Militarily, that is. Not politically. Unfortunately, that weaker force won’t be an issue until it’s too late. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5325/uss-george-washington-carrier-white-house/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5325/uss-george-washington-carrier-white-house/"},"headline":"White House Punts on Retiring Aircraft Carrier","datePublished":"2014-02-07T16:24:02.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T06:19:46.965Z","description":"Under congressional pressure, Obama decides to keep 11 carriers sailing, at least past the shoals of the midterm elections","url":"https://time.com/5325/uss-george-washington-carrier-white-house/","keywords":["Military","politics","Obama","Pentagon"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltedad528d2311e3ca/698681fe06f2c1ed7f32d7e6/154636782.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltedad528d2311e3ca/698681fe06f2c1ed7f32d7e6/154636782.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"PHILIPPINES - US - MLITARY - DIPLOMACY","caption":"PHILIPPINES - US - MLITARY - DIPLOMACY","creditText":"NOEL CELIS / AFP / Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/military/","name":"Military"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5325/uss-george-washington-carrier-white-house/","name":"White House Punts on Retiring Aircraft Carrier"}}]}] ```