--- title: I Was an Admiral. Why Trump Ending 'War Games' Is a Mistake description: President Donald Trump told North Korea he'll stop military exercises with South Korea. It would damage U.S. forces' standing in the world canonical: https://time.com/5310534/donald-trump-north-korea-war-games-military-exercises/ author: James Stavridis article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-06-12T21:39:45.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T11:39:45.297Z article:section: Ideas og:title: I Was a Navy Admiral. Here's Why Ending 'War Games' With South Korea Would Be a Grave Mistake og:description: And how it would damage the standing of American forces across the world og:url: https://time.com/5310534/donald-trump-north-korea-war-games-military-exercises/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfb805625e46622a4/698932e4bc6cfc55e93e6330/donald-trump-south-korea-war-games.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: U.S. and South Korean Marines Conduct Joint Military Exercise og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: I Was a Navy Admiral. Here's Why Ending 'War Games' With South Korea Would Be a Grave Mistake twitter:description: And how it would damage the standing of American forces across the world twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfb805625e46622a4/698932e4bc6cfc55e93e6330/donald-trump-south-korea-war-games.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # I Was a Navy Admiral. Here's Why Ending 'War Games' With South Korea Would Be a Grave Mistake > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=37cbe35a-f2b7-436c-86bc-e8894578070a&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=37cbe35a-f2b7-436c-86bc-e8894578070a&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=37cbe35a-f2b7-436c-86bc-e8894578070a&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [James Stavridis](https://time.com/author/james-stavridis/) ## James Stavridis Jun 12, 2018 9:39 PM UTC  South Korean marines take part in a military exercise on April 5, 2018 in Pohang, South Korea. South Korean marines take part in a military exercise on April 5, 2018 in Pohang, South Korea. Chung Sung-Jun—Getty Images by [James Stavridis](https://time.com/author/james-stavridis/) ## James Stavridis Jun 12, 2018 9:39 PM UTC At the final press conference of a whirlwind [summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un](http://www.time.com/longform/donald-trump-kim-jong-un-photos/) in Singapore, [President Donald Trump](http://time.com/5309556/donald-trump-kim-jong-un-north-korea-summit-reality/) announced off-hand that the United States would end what he called its [“provocative war games”](http://time.com/5309627/president-trump-why-war-games-end/) with South Korea. While [the summit itself is a reasonable beginning](http://time.com/5310064/north-korea-summit-donald-trump-kim-jong-un-congress-reaction/) to what may turn out to be a diplomatic solution to this knotty international problem, to immediately fulfill that promise would be a grave error. After decades as a senior military officer, I cannot imagine simply stopping these useful, sensible and necessary [military exercises](http://time.com/5309792/south-korea-military-exercise-history/) without first seeing tangible progress in terms of not only denuclearization by North Korea, but also _demilitarization_ by that nation, which fields the fourth-largest army in the world. Let’s begin with the basics. First, these are not “war games,” which are generally considered to be tabletop exercises that intellectually probe various tactical and strategic options in a given scenario. These are operational military exercises in which ships, aircraft, ground forces and special operators actually practice executing defined war plans. These are like a football team running plays in practice until the movements of the various team members becomes utterly instinctive; or a tennis player hitting thousands of topspin forehands until she can effortlessly nail the shot in an actual match. To have forces forward-deployed _without_ the benefit of this kind of practice would be negligent in the extreme, and it could lead to major combat losses in a real fight. Second, it is important to understand the scale of these exercises. We do them constantly, often on a weekly basis, with larger events monthly and truly grand-scale exercises a couple of times a year. A weekly exercise might be a U.S. engineering company working alongside our South Korean partners to practice clearing battlefield obstructions. Each month might see our fighter jets in mock combat over the skies of South Korea. A big semi-annual event would include warships from the U.S., Japan, Australia, Singapore and other allies operating together at sea off the coasts of the Korean peninsula. One of the largest annual exercises is Ulchi Freedom Guardian, scheduled for this fall, which could bring about 70,000 U.S. and South Korean troops together to practice warfighting. If we were to unilaterally stop all of those exercises, our readiness would suffer considerably, given all they do to prepare us to “fight tonight” — the motto of U.S. Forces Korea. There is also a highly negative impact on the seriousness with which our allies — notably South Korea, but also other Indo-Asian partners like Australia, Singapore, and India — view our military capability. One of the reasons our allies, partners and friends want to operate with the United States is the professionalism and readiness of our military. All of that is honed by these exercises — and reduced when we stop conducting them. This announcement [shocked them](https://www.militarytimes.com/flashpoints/2018/06/12/trumps-vow-to-end-military-drills-with-seoul-stuns-a-region/). It will cause our allies to hesitate in aligning with us going forward. Finally, the U.S. military itself would suffer a drop in morale if not allowed to practice for war. Nobody knows better than our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines how important exercising the military is to the chances of victory. As the military saying goes, the “more you bleed in practice, the less you die in war.” Training hard and realistically — along with providing proper equipment and leadership — is part of the bedrock of the U.S. military ethos. Additionally, the announcement seemed to [catch the Pentagon by surprise](https://gulfnews.com/news/asia/north-korea/trump-pledge-to-halt-military-exercises-surprises-pentagon-and-seoul-1.2235989), and the cavalier way in which the President rolled it out will diminish the confidence that the troops — and the Secretary of Defense himself — have in the Commander-in-Chief. What is particularly troubling is that we’ve provided this bargaining chip seemingly without getting anything in return other than vague promises for eventual [denuclearization](http://time.com/5309425/donald-trump-kim-jong-un-summit-document-full-text/). Even if that actually happens — and it has been promised before with no actual results — the North Korean massive conventional force (including a million-plus man army) would pose a significant threat to the south. Without U.S. military presence and these exercises, there is every possibility that North Korea would become the dominant actor on the peninsula, especially [with Chinese backing](http://time.com/5310082/trump-kim-summit-singapore-china-victory/). Stopping the exercises plays into the hands not only of North Korea but also of China, right as it reduces America’s readiness for dealing with military contingencies. Both allies and our own military probably take some solace that the President at least stopped short of announcing the actual withdrawal of U.S. troops from South Korea. But he has mused about this in the past and will probably take up that note again. He seems to see all of this — stopping the military exercises, consulting with allies, stationing troops overseas — as expensive and troublesome. What he misses is that it is part of a coherent whole that creates a network of allies and coalition partners around the world who are willing to stand with us on the big issues. When I commanded the NATO coalition in Afghanistan, we had 150,000 troops from about 50 nations alongside us: the 27 other NATO partners and many more who came because of a belief in the professionalism, credibility and capability of the U.S. armed forces. Snap decisions to stop our exercises, even when in the cause of moving a peace process forward, can hurt us badly across the globe. We should continue exercising with South Korea unless or until [Kim Jung Un](http://time.com/5309652/north-korea-start-denuclearizing-immediately-donald-trump-interview/) shows us concrete steps in dismantling not only his nuclear weapons program but his massive conventional forces as well. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5310534/donald-trump-north-korea-war-games-military-exercises/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5310534/donald-trump-north-korea-war-games-military-exercises/"},"headline":"I Was a Navy Admiral. Here's Why Ending 'War Games' With South Korea Would Be a Grave Mistake","datePublished":"2018-06-12T21:39:45.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T11:39:45.297Z","description":"And how it would damage the standing of American forces across the world","url":"https://time.com/5310534/donald-trump-north-korea-war-games-military-exercises/","keywords":["Foreign Policy","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfb805625e46622a4/698932e4bc6cfc55e93e6330/donald-trump-south-korea-war-games.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"James Stavridis","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/james-stavridis/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltfb805625e46622a4/698932e4bc6cfc55e93e6330/donald-trump-south-korea-war-games.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"U.S. and South Korean Marines Conduct Joint Military Exercise","caption":"U.S. and South Korean Marines Conduct Joint Military Exercise","creditText":"Chung Sung-Jun—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/foreign-policy/","name":"Foreign Policy"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5310534/donald-trump-north-korea-war-games-military-exercises/","name":"I Was a Navy Admiral. Here's Why Ending 'War Games' With South Korea Would Be a Grave Mistake"}}]}] ```