--- title: Steven Calabresi Argues Mueller Probe Unconstitutional description: One of the founders of the Federalist Society is advancing a controversial legal theory that Robert Mueller’s probe is unconstitutional. canonical: https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/ author: Tessa Berenson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-05-25T19:13:28.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-12T09:28:45.772Z article:section: Politics og:title: A Prominent Conservative Scholar Is Arguing the Mueller Probe Is Unconstitutional og:description: But not everyone buys his argument. og:url: https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6764d68b1f2d0443/6988f9a7e76ad25eb7630c88/gettyimages-103136889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: FBI Director Mueller Testifies At Senate Judiciary Cmte Hearing og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: A Prominent Conservative Scholar Is Arguing the Mueller Probe Is Unconstitutional twitter:description: But not everyone buys his argument. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6764d68b1f2d0443/6988f9a7e76ad25eb7630c88/gettyimages-103136889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # A Prominent Conservative Scholar Is Arguing the Mueller Probe Is Unconstitutional > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d3efd9e0-54de-459b-95b4-8b3ce98c1ef4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d3efd9e0-54de-459b-95b4-8b3ce98c1ef4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=d3efd9e0-54de-459b-95b4-8b3ce98c1ef4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=d3efd9e0-54de-459b-95b4-8b3ce98c1ef4&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: President Trump: 'Spies in My Campaign Would Be Unprecedented' [Watch (HLS stream): President Trump: 'Spies in My Campaign Would Be Unprecedented'](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/ClGlhwsZ.m3u8) (0:26)  _Published 2018-05-23. “SPYGATE could be one of the biggest political scandals in history!” Trump said in an early morning Twitter tirade_  by [Tessa Berenson](https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/)  ## Tessa Berenson May 25, 2018 7:13 PM UTC “SPYGATE could be one of the biggest political scandals in history!” Trump said in an early morning Twitter tirade  by [Tessa Berenson](https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/)  ## Tessa Berenson May 25, 2018 7:13 PM UTC One of the founders of the conservative Federalist Society is advancing a controversial legal theory that Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation is unconstitutional. In a [guest editorial in the _Wall Street Journal_](https://www.wsj.com/articles/muellers-investigation-crosses-the-legal-line-1526233750) earlier this month and a call with reporters Friday afternoon, Northwestern law professor Steven Calabresi argued that Mueller cannot oversee such a broad investigation because he was not confirmed by the Senate. Calabresi argues that under the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, an official overseeing the probe would be a “principal officer,” and thus would have to be someone who was appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. “\[Mueller\] is a principal officer, and since he has not been nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, everything he has done since May 1, 2017 has been unconstitutional and has been illegal,” he told reporters on the call, which was hosted but not endorsed by the Federalist Society. Critics say the argument is far-fetched, though not implausible. “It is a good-faith argument but I remain skeptical on its chances in the courts,,” Jonathan Turley, professor at The George Washington University Law School, told TIME in an email. “\[Mueller\] is closely tethered to the discretion of the Deputy Attorney General and operates only within the confines established by the mandate.” The argument rests on a 1988 Supreme Court case called _Morrison v. Olson_, in which the court held that an independent counsel was an “inferior officer,” and not a principal, because the office was “limited in jurisdiction” to “certain federal officials suspected of certain serious federal crimes.” But Calabresi argues that Mueller’s probe fails that test, since it has broadened beyond a limited investigation into a broader one that has so far brought charges on potential money laundering by former Trump campaign head Paul Manafort, low-level campaign aides making false statements to investigators about their contacts with Russia and propaganda efforts by Russian operatives. Mueller reports to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, since Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the investigation. But even though Rosenstein was confirmed by the Senate — making him a “principal officer” — Calabresi argues that he’s not supervising Mueller’s work closely enough to count under the Appointments Clause. The stakes of the argument are high. If Mueller’s appointment really is unconstitutional, then Calabresi argues all of the actions he’s taken since his appointment in May of 2017 are “null and void,” including “all of the indictments he has brought, all of the plea bargains he has entered into, all the searches he has conducted, his phone logging of Michael Cohen and subsequent of referral of Michael Cohen to the Southern District of New York for prosecution, and any other governmental actions he has taken.” The Justice Department declined to comment on the argument. Manafort has already brought a version of this question before a court and lost. After Manafort was indicted on charges related to his lobbying efforts on behalf of Ukraine, his lawyers filed a motion in the D.C. District Court arguing that Mueller had exceeded the limits of his authority. Judge Amy Berman Jackson [dismissed Manafort’s motion](https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000163-6599-d92c-a17f-eddde22f0001), saying it “falls squarely” within Rosenstein’s original memo to Mueller on the probe, which gave him the authority to look into any matters which “may arise” from an investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, though her decision was based on legal statutes and not the constitutional question Calabresi raises. “It was logical and appropriate for investigators tasked with the investigation of ‘any links’ between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign to direct their attention to him,” she wrote of Manafort, noting: “The Acting Attorney General had the authority under the applicable statutes and regulations to define the Special Counsel’s charter broadly.” John Q. Barrett, law professor at St. John’s University, notes that the independent counsel statute that the Supreme Court upheld in _Morrison v. Olson_ was even more broadly designed than Mueller’s position. “The greater includes the lesser,” he says. In other words, if an independent counsel with more expansive power is constitutional, then Mueller’s special counsel position likely is too. But Calabresi says Mueller’s actions over the past year have shown he’s become too powerful under the definition set forth in _Morrison,_ regardless of what regulation says. “With all due respect to the statute and to the CFR \[Code of Federal Regulations\], I think Mueller is much too important an officer to be called an inferior officer,” he said. Since his appointment more than [a year ago](http://time.com/5277000/robert-mueller-investigation-questions/), Mueller has indicted 19 people and secured five guilty pleas. It’s all, according to Calabresi, “fruit of a poisonous tree.” ## Transcript [00:00] A lot of people are saying they had spies in my [00:02] campaign. If they had spies in my campaign, that [00:05] would be a disgrace to this country. That would be one [00:08] of the biggest insults that anyone has ever seen, and it [00:11] would be very illegal. It would make probably Every [00:13] political event ever looked like small potatoes. But if [00:17] they had spies in my campaign, during my campaign [00:20] for political purposes, that would be unprecedented in [00:24] the history of our country. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/"},"headline":"A Prominent Conservative Scholar Is Arguing the Mueller Probe Is Unconstitutional","datePublished":"2018-05-25T19:13:28.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-12T09:28:45.772Z","description":"One of the founders of the Federalist Society is advancing a controversial legal theory that Robert Mueller’s probe is unconstitutional.","url":"https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/","keywords":["justice","Justice Department","Department of Justice","Robert Mueller","special counsel"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6764d68b1f2d0443/6988f9a7e76ad25eb7630c88/gettyimages-103136889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Tessa Berenson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/tessa-berenson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt6764d68b1f2d0443/6988f9a7e76ad25eb7630c88/gettyimages-103136889.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"FBI Director Mueller Testifies At Senate Judiciary Cmte Hearing","caption":"FBI Director Mueller Testifies At Senate Judiciary Cmte Hearing","creditText":"Alex Wong—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/justice/","name":"justice"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/","name":"A Prominent Conservative Scholar Is Arguing the Mueller Probe Is Unconstitutional"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"President Trump: 'Spies in My Campaign Would Be Unprecedented'","description":"“SPYGATE could be one of the biggest political scandals in history!” Trump said in an early morning Twitter tirade","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/ClGlhwsZ/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2018-05-23T13:28:53.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/ClGlhwsZ.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/","duration":"PT26S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5292170/robert-mueller-special-counsel-unconstitutional-steven-calabresi/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```