--- title: Gina Haspel's Testimony Changed My Opinion of Her description: An attorney for Abu Zubaydah, who was tortured at the CIA site Haspel later ran, watched the Acting CIA Director testify to Congress canonical: https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/ author: Joseph Margulies article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-05-10T18:20:51.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-12T09:09:29.178Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Gina Haspel Ran the CIA Site Where My Client Had Been Tortured og:description: Her testimony changed my opinion of her og:url: https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9ab3c528d80ded37/69893000fb4eac9e1089694e/gina-haspel-cia1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2405 og:image:height: 1353 og:image:alt: Gina Haspel CIA og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Gina Haspel Ran the CIA Site Where My Client Had Been Tortured twitter:description: Her testimony changed my opinion of her twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9ab3c528d80ded37/69893000fb4eac9e1089694e/gina-haspel-cia1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Gina Haspel Ran the CIA Site Where My Client Had Been Tortured. Her Testimony Changed My Opinion of Her > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=5cd8dacc-d44c-4d8e-ae22-648157c6a2d0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=5cd8dacc-d44c-4d8e-ae22-648157c6a2d0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=5cd8dacc-d44c-4d8e-ae22-648157c6a2d0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=5cd8dacc-d44c-4d8e-ae22-648157c6a2d0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Trump's CIA Nominee Gina Haspel Says the Agency Learned 'Tough Lessons' From Torture Program [Watch (HLS stream): Trump's CIA Nominee Gina Haspel Says the Agency Learned 'Tough Lessons' From Torture Program](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/L21sJVok.m3u8) (1:44)  _Published 2018-05-09. President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the next CIA director said Wednesday the spy agency learned “tough lessons” from its use of harsh detention and interrogation tactics on terror suspects after 9/11_ by [Joseph Margulies](https://time.com/author/joe-margulies/) ## Joseph Margulies May 10, 2018 6:20 PM UTC President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the next CIA director said Wednesday the spy agency learned “tough lessons” from its use of harsh detention and interrogation tactics on terror suspects after 9/11 by [Joseph Margulies](https://time.com/author/joe-margulies/) ## Joseph Margulies May 10, 2018 6:20 PM UTC When President Donald Trump announced he would appoint [Gina Haspel](http://time.com/5267635/donald-trump-defends-cia-nominee-gina-haspel/) to replace Mike Pompeo at the Central Intelligence Agency, many of my colleagues on the Left rushed to condemn her. [But I cautioned us to withhold judgment.](http://time.com/5199408/abu-zubaydah-lawyer-gina-haspel/) I thought that [Haspel’s past association](http://time.com/5198054/gina-haspel-cia-torture-senate/) with the “enhanced interrogation” program — including her eventual leadership of the CIA black site where my client, [Abu Zubaydah](http://time.com/5199408/abu-zubaydah-lawyer-gina-haspel/), had been waterboarded 83 times — raised more questions than it answered. “Now of all times,” I wrote, “we need less knee-jerk condemnation and more sober, careful assessment. That is why we have a confirmation process.” The public portion of that process took place yesterday. I watched Acting CIA Director Haspel testify, and I read the transcript. Frankly, there was [much in the hearing](http://time.com/5271074/gina-haspel-senate-confirmation-hearing/) that was gratifying. A fair reading of her testimony reveals Haspel to be a thoughtful, experienced champion of the agency. Still, no one who shares my devotion to official transparency and deliberative democracy can be satisfied. Haspel’s equivocations and evasions were inexcusable. First, there is the matter of her moral judgment. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) asked whether she would accede if Trump asked her to do something she found “morally objectionable.” She answered, “Senator, my moral compass is strong. I would not allow CIA to undertake activity that I thought was immoral, even if it was technically legal. I would absolutely not permit it.” So far so good — and many rightly take comfort in her response. But then Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA), who seemed to be the only person on the Committee who has ever set foot in a courtroom, asked Haspel the natural follow-up: whether Haspel believed the [enhanced interrogation techniques](http://time.com/3643797/cia-interrogator-speaks/) were immoral. Haspel equivocated. Having just vowed not to permit behavior she thought was personally immoral, she refused to answer a question about what that meant. So Senator Harris, undeterred, repeated the question, again posing it as succinctly and directly as possible. Again, Haspel refused to answer. Harris asked it a third time. And a fourth. Haspel wandered. Because it is so revealing, and because people should educate themselves and _then_ form their own judgment, here is the entire exchange: --- > “” --- Gina Haspel sat before the American people and touted her “moral compass” — but refused to show us which way it points. Then there is Haspel’s view of the enhanced interrogation program itself. The headline takeaway for many viewers was her insistence that she would not restart the program “under any circumstances,” regardless of what the President wanted. Again, so far so good. But the point of a confirmation process is to dig beneath the superficial, and in that regard, she also made it perfectly clear she thought the program produced useful intelligence, that it was entirely legal and, as far as we can tell given her answers to Senator Harris, completely consistent with her personal morality. Then why not restart it? No one asked that question, but Haspel gave us some insight when she said she would not endanger CIA officers “by asking them to undertake risky, controversial activity again.” The implication — particularly of that word _controversial_ — seems to be that she would be entirely comfortable with the same or equivalent operations so long as there was no risk of discovery by the American people, since the [disclosure of such operations](http://time.com/5025470/john-mccain-steven-bradbury-torture/) is what brings calumny to the Agency and risk to its officers. I appreciate the need for secrecy. But throughout its history, this reflexive devotion to operating in the shadows has repeatedly disserved the Agency. It is worth remembering that the “enhanced interrogation program” is merely the latest in a series of operations by the CIA to study, refine and deploy torture, all of which — from Operation Phoenix in Vietnam to covert operations in Latin America under the tutelage of the “[Human Resources Exploitation Manual](https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB122/#hre)” — were illegal, immoral and secret. Finally, there is her evident conflict in declassification. Radical transparency means that the person whose laundry may be aired cannot be responsible for deciding what gets hung on the line. Yet we learned yesterday that Haspel alone has been deciding what fraction of her long record as a CIA officer will be disclosed. Naturally, she protests that she is following pre-existing policy and that full disclosure would make her an even more attractive candidate. She may be right. The point, however, is that the public should make that judgment, not her. A default rule which forces the American people to accept blindly the assurances of the person they are asked to assess is always suspect. Some will inevitably dismiss my criticisms as partisan sniping. Yet this is part of the problem. The idea has taken hold that citizens discharge their obligation to the republic merely by ascertaining the political leaning of the person raising an objection. Once they acquire this knowledge, they believe they have everything they need to exercise the duty of citizenship and make an informed, independent judgment. But especially today, when the foundational institutions of American life are under constant assault and [the very idea of truth is called into question by the loudest voices](http://time.com/5048402/donald-trump-michael-flynn-russia-lies/) in the public square, we cannot afford to collapse deliberative democracy into partisan branding. I do not know whether Gina Haspel went along willingly with yesterday’s hearing or whether she acceded to the tutoring of experienced political handlers who assured her that this was the only way to win confirmation. All I know is that because she has the support of so many people I trust, I _wanted_ to support her nomination, notwithstanding her association with my client’s torture. But I cannot. My moral compass will not allow it. ## Transcript In light of my counter terrorism experience. I understand that many people want to know about, are my views on CIA's former detention and interrogation program. I have views on this issue and I want to be clear. Having served in that tumultuous time, I can offer you my personal commitment clearly and without reservation, that under my leadership, on my watch, CIA will not restart a detention and interrogation program. CIA has learned some tough lessons from that experience We were asked to tackle a mission that fell outside our expertise. For me, there is no better example of implementing lessons learned than what the agency took away from that program. In retrospect it is clear, as the SSCI Majority Report concluded, That CIA was not prepared to conduct a detention and interrogation program. Today the US government has a clear legal and policy framework that governs detentions and interrogations. Specifically, the law provides that no individual in U. S. custody may be subjected to any interrogation, technique or approach that is not authorized by, enlisted in the army field manual. I fully support The detainee treatment required by law. And just as importantly I will keep CIA focused on our collection and analysis missions that can best leverage the expertise we have at the agency. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/"},"headline":"Gina Haspel Ran the CIA Site Where My Client Had Been Tortured. Her Testimony Changed My Opinion of Her","datePublished":"2018-05-10T18:20:51.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-12T09:09:29.178Z","description":"Questions remain about her 'moral compass'","url":"https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/","keywords":["politics","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9ab3c528d80ded37/69893000fb4eac9e1089694e/gina-haspel-cia1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Joseph Margulies","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/joe-margulies/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9ab3c528d80ded37/69893000fb4eac9e1089694e/gina-haspel-cia1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Gina Haspel CIA","caption":"CIA Nominee Haspel, Washington, USA","creditText":"Alex Brandon—AP/Shutterstock","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/","name":"Gina Haspel Ran the CIA Site Where My Client Had Been Tortured. Her Testimony Changed My Opinion of Her"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Trump's CIA Nominee Gina Haspel Says the Agency Learned 'Tough Lessons' From Torture Program","description":"President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the next CIA director said Wednesday the spy agency learned “tough lessons” from its use of harsh detention and interrogation tactics on terror suspects after 9/11","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/L21sJVok/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2018-05-09T15:30:25.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/L21sJVok.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/","duration":"PT1M44S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5273061/gina-haspel-torture-testimony-abu-zubaydah-waterboarding/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```