--- title: The YouTube Shooting Reflects a New Anger with Online Work description: Nasim Aghdam's shooting at YouTube reveals a lot about Uber drivers, Airbnb hosts and others whose livelihoods rely on faceless algorithms canonical: https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/ copyright: © 2026 TIME USA, LLC. All Rights Reserved. terms: https://legal.time.com/terms-of-service/ license_contact: syndication@time.com author: Arun Sundararajan article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-04-05T20:00:47.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-12T09:05:18.386Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The YouTube Shooting Reflects a Growing Anger in the Digital Workforce og:description: It is not simply a workplace shooting or a culmination of Facebook frustration og:url: https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt178024cea05a1dbf/69892cf622fb853528e2543b/sharing-economy-digital-algorithm-youtube.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2450 og:image:height: 1378 og:image:alt: Sharing Economy og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The YouTube Shooting Reflects a Growing Anger in the Digital Workforce twitter:description: It is not simply a workplace shooting or a culmination of Facebook frustration twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt178024cea05a1dbf/69892cf622fb853528e2543b/sharing-economy-digital-algorithm-youtube.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The YouTube Shooting Reflects a Growing Anger in the Digital Workforce > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c8029611-93ad-4bcf-874a-e5e1deba9677&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c8029611-93ad-4bcf-874a-e5e1deba9677&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=c8029611-93ad-4bcf-874a-e5e1deba9677&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c8029611-93ad-4bcf-874a-e5e1deba9677&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: 1 Dead, 3 Wounded: The Latest on the Shooting at YouTube Headquarters in San Bruno [Watch (HLS stream): 1 Dead, 3 Wounded: The Latest on the Shooting at YouTube Headquarters in San Bruno](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/WmQ41lAh.m3u8) (1:48)  _Published 2018-04-03. A suspected female shooter is dead and four others injured after shots were fired at YouTube’s headquarters in San Bruno, Calif., Tuesday afternoon, according to San Bruno police._ by [Arun Sundararajan](https://time.com/author/arun-sundararajan/) ## Arun Sundararajan Apr 5, 2018 8:00 PM UTC A suspected female shooter is dead and four others injured after shots were fired at YouTube’s headquarters in San Bruno, Calif., Tuesday afternoon, according to San Bruno police. by [Arun Sundararajan](https://time.com/author/arun-sundararajan/) ## Arun Sundararajan Apr 5, 2018 8:00 PM UTC We may never know exactly what caused [Nasim Aghdam](http://time.com/5228900/nasim-aghdam-youtube-motive/) to take the drastic steps of arming herself with a handgun, seeking out YouTube’s San Bruno, Calif., headquarters, and [shooting three innocent employees before taking her own life](http://time.com/5226954/youtube-headquarters-shooter-san-bruno/). Snippets of evidence have emerged that point to varied reasons for Aghdam’s anger toward the Internet giant: her website (deactivated following the shooting) complaining about her YouTube content being [demonetized](https://medium.com/internet-creators-guild/youtube-de-monetization-explained-44464f902a22); a video she posted on YouTube (since removed) expressing fury about inconsistencies in how YouTube censored her workout videos; a picture of her holding a banner [protesting YouTube’s “dictatorship.”](http://gossiponthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/nasim-aghdam-youtube-dictatorship-policy-poster.jpg) It may be tempting to chalk the incident up as yet another random [U.S. workplace shooting](https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/workplace-homicides.htm), or to conclude that a growing national sense of unease about the censorship and privacy policies of digital giants like Facebook and Google has reached a boiling point. But this tragedy to some degree reflects a new and different kind of anguish, with a world in which faceless and opaque algorithms replace more familiar physical world institutions and bosses, not just as our censors but as our paths to opportunity. As the economic and societal power of these algorithms expands, it is essential that the companies in control prove worthy of the public trust that we place in them. YouTube represents one of the earliest examples of [_crowd-based capitalism_](https://legal-forum.uchicago.edu/publication/crowd-based-capitalism-digital-automation-and-future-work): a new way of organizing economic activity wherein a digital platform, a hybrid of sorts between the traditional corporation and the invisible hand of the marketplace, gathers customers and connects them to a distributed and heterogeneous crowd of on-demand talent, individual entrepreneurs and small businesses. We’ve seen examples of these platforms emerge in numerous industries over the past decade, ranging from [sharing-economy](https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/sharing-economy) giants like Lyft and Uber for transportation and Airbnb for short-term accommodation to talent marketplaces like UpCounsel for legal services and Catalant for management consulting. No doubt, many of these platforms have expanded and equalized access to opportunity tremendously. The ambitions of aspiring sitcom writers or movie directors no longer need be stymied by limited programming slots or the whims of studio executives. Today, access to a market of billions is just a few clicks away, allowing millions of content creators to find and monetize an audience while spawning a new subculture of [YouTube celebrity](http://www.tvguide.com/galleries/youtube-stars-make-more-1089689/). In fact, digital video advertising revenues in China are projected to actually [exceed those generated by television ads](https://www.emarketer.com/Article/Chinarsquos-Digital-Video-Ad-Spending-Overtake-TV-by-2021/1016452) by 2021, a tipping point that the U.S. will undoubtedly reach in a few years. Airbnb empowers [over four million](https://www.airbnb.com/trust) hosts to run a new kind of bed-and-breakfast business out of their homes. Uber, Lyft, and Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing have created or expanded the passenger base for tens of millions of drivers around the world. But a perceived loss of individual agency when things go wrong can make pursuing this new opportunity seem like a Faustian bargain for some. For [millions of Amazon marketplace sellers](https://techcrunch.com/2015/01/05/amazon-third-party-sellers-2014/), many of them small retailers whose customer reach has been dramatically expanded by the platform, success rests on the unpredictable whims of how the retailing giant’s algorithm ranks results to consumer search queries. While a majority of ride-hail drivers are [satisfied with their experience](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g8pz00OnCb2mFj%5F97548nJAj4HfluExUEgVb45HwDrE/edit) with Uber and feel empowered by the work flexibility such platforms afford them, many encounter a [sense of helplessness](https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/06/09/531642304/the-faceless-boss-a-look-into-the-uber-driver-workplace) when they have no access to a human when deactivated by the platform. This frustration may not result in drastic action, but do not misinterpret its lack of publicity as a sign it isn’t growing. Failure also becomes less predictable and explainable. In the past, if you were fired from your job, or your TV show was cancelled, there would likely be warning signals from your boss or an advance drop in your viewership numbers; if slowing foot traffic to your restaurant or retail store threatened the viability of your small business, the signs would build up over many months. Now, the fluctuations can be sudden and severe. A Google or Yelp machine-learning algorithm — which perhaps even the programmers at the company do not fully understand — changes, and your livelihood vanishes. While technological progress makes a certain level of dehumanizing of our experiences inevitable, the ensuing blowback can be managed better by making good design choices. Part of the solution is to invest not just in greater accuracy but also in greater transparency. Yes, it is both necessary and commendable that YouTube and Facebook are working hard on improving their performance as society’s de facto censors, striving to do a better job separating the fake news from the real and the objectionable content from the benign (in part by hiring [thousands of humans](https://slate.com/technology/2018/01/facebook-and-google-are-building-an-army-of-content-moderators-for-2018.html) to supplement and improve their automated systems). But an equally important accompanying change must be to provide users with greater visibility into how these algorithms are actually making their decisions. Such transparency doesn’t just enhance predictability or give users a better understanding of any negative outcomes they encounter. The understanding then makes it easier for users to identify when they have actually been unfairly treated and would enable platforms to provide some form of due process, a system to address the fallout from erroneous assessments by algorithms. The active pursuit of greater transparency has yet another happy by-product: it will favor algorithms that are more easily _explainable_ rather than being “[black boxes.](https://intelligence.org/2013/08/25/transparency-in-safety-critical-systems/)” Being able to provide a simple, clear and logical explanation for how automated systems make their choices will be critical to both social acceptance and to [understanding biases](https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing) as algorithms play a central role in deciding not just what content is censored or what transportation we get, but what college a student is admitted to, what medical treatment a patient receives, what prison sentences are meted out or perhaps even whether an autonomous weapon takes a life. The fact that so many producers do not know precisely how and why they’re being treated in a way they consider unfair signals greater trouble ahead if we do not correct our course. We are wading deeper into an uncertain digital future, where platforms and their artificial intelligence–powered algorithms take on greater importance in the world, maybe even evolving into the most significant institutions of society. The emergence of entities that rival nation-state governments in their influence and power is not a new development: a glance through history reveals that organizations ranging from the Catholic Church and the British East India Company to Florence’s Medici family played similar roles at different times and in different places. What is new, however, is that this time around, we have the opportunity to _explicitly_ design these new institutions, to code them in a way that favors positive societal outcomes. Transparency should be a central guiding principle. It may not eliminate the angst, but it will go a long way towards alleviating it. ## Transcript [ BLANK_AUDIO ] At 12: 46 PM this afternoon, San Bruno Police Department received numerous 911 calls regarding gunshots at the YouTube campus located on Cherry Avenue in our city. We have four victims who have all been transported [ BLANK_AUDIO ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/"},"headline":"The YouTube Shooting Reflects a Growing Anger in the Digital Workforce","datePublished":"2018-04-05T20:00:47.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-12T09:05:18.386Z","description":"It is not simply a workplace shooting or a culmination of Facebook frustration","url":"https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/","keywords":["Labor","Tech","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt178024cea05a1dbf/69892cf622fb853528e2543b/sharing-economy-digital-algorithm-youtube.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Arun Sundararajan","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/arun-sundararajan/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt178024cea05a1dbf/69892cf622fb853528e2543b/sharing-economy-digital-algorithm-youtube.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Sharing Economy","caption":"Light Trails Over City","creditText":"Paul Taylor—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/labor/","name":"Labor"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/","name":"The YouTube Shooting Reflects a Growing Anger in the Digital Workforce"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"1 Dead, 3 Wounded: The Latest on the Shooting at YouTube Headquarters in San Bruno","description":"A suspected female shooter is dead and four others injured after shots were fired at YouTube’s headquarters in San Bruno, Calif., Tuesday afternoon, according to San Bruno police.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/WmQ41lAh/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2018-04-03T22:55:33.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/WmQ41lAh.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/","duration":"PT1M48S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5229614/nasim-aghdam-youtube-shooting-algorithm/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```