--- title: Pennsylvania Special Election Shows Limits of GOP Spending description: More Democratic dollars went to candidate Conor Lamb, while more Republican money went to outside groups backing state Rep. Rick Saccone. canonical: https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/ author: Alana Abramson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-03-14T22:00:28.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-12T09:02:48.066Z article:section: Politics og:title: Pa. Special Election Exposed a Big Flaw in GOP Campaign Spending og:description: The GOP's advantage in outside spending may not matter as much anymore og:url: https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08f83c9fb32aa4f2/69892aca656a3f330abd3daf/gettyimages-931685076.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5133 og:image:height: 2887 og:image:alt: Conor Lamb, Democratic congressional candidate for Pennsylvania's 18th district, speaks to supporters at an election night rally March 14, 2018 in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Pa. Special Election Exposed a Big Flaw in GOP Campaign Spending twitter:description: The GOP's advantage in outside spending may not matter as much anymore twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08f83c9fb32aa4f2/69892aca656a3f330abd3daf/gettyimages-931685076.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Pennsylvania Special Election Exposed a Big Flaw in GOP Campaign Spending > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=08b7c1c7-f615-4d18-8472-ed2141fd043e&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=08b7c1c7-f615-4d18-8472-ed2141fd043e&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=08b7c1c7-f615-4d18-8472-ed2141fd043e&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=08b7c1c7-f615-4d18-8472-ed2141fd043e&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Republican Rick Saccone Concedes Pennsylvania Special Election to Democrat Conor Lamb [Watch (HLS stream): Republican Rick Saccone Concedes Pennsylvania Special Election to Democrat Conor Lamb](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/5F89b6SX.m3u8) (1:35)  _Published 2018-03-14. Democrat Conor Lamb is declaring victory in a southwestern Pennsylvania congressional election that is rocking the political landscape ahead of the November midterm elections._  by [Alana Abramson](https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/)  ## Alana Abramson Mar 14, 2018 10:00 PM UTC Democrat Conor Lamb is declaring victory in a southwestern Pennsylvania congressional election that is rocking the political landscape ahead of the November midterm elections.  by [Alana Abramson](https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/)  ## Alana Abramson Mar 14, 2018 10:00 PM UTC Republicans and Democrats are employing [very different fundraising strategies](http://fortune.com/2018/02/06/campaign-fundraising-2018-election-democrats-republicans/) ahead of the midterm elections, but the results of a special election in Pennsylvania show the GOP strategy may have some drawbacks. As in other races, a higher amount of Democratic dollars went straight to candidate Conor Lamb, while more Republican money went to outside groups backing state Rep. Rick Saccone. Lamb’s official campaign committee outraised Saccone’s 3 to 1, [according to Issue One](https://www.issueone.org/10-numbers-to-know-about-the-money-in-the-pa18-special-election/), a non-partisan group that tracks spending in politics. But outside groups backing Saccone outspent outside groups backing Lamb 6 to 1. But the outside money did not seem to work in Pennsylvania, where Lamb currently leads by around 700 votes in a district that went heavily for President Donald Trump less than two years ago. Although Lamb and the Democratic party has claimed victory, the Associated Press says the race is still close to call. Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks money in politics, said outside spending is not a reliable indicator of how an election will go, because it doesn’t necessarily translate into votes since the biggest donors often hail from outside the voting conclaves. “Outside groups can spend any money they want but the question is at the end of the day are voters still open to their messages or whether they’ve already made up their minds,” said Krumholz, “The outside groups are not going to be ones the pulling the lever to cast a vote.” The fundraising and spending patterns of both parties in these races mimicked what seems to be happening on a broader stage across the country. Democratic dollars have primarily gone to the candidate’s coffers, while Republican money went to outside groups. Lamb out-raised Saccone by $3 million, FEC documents show. While he had raised nearly $3.9 million by February 21, Saccone had raised nearly $920,000\. And Lamb had the advantage when it came to small donors. Over half of Lamb’s total individual contributions were unitemized, or less than $200, in comparison with 24 percent of Saccone’s. Lamb also declined to accept money from corporate Political Action Committees. But Republicans had investments from some of the party’s biggest donors who had contributed to party committees and outside spending groups, and they went all in. Per FEC filings, conservative groups and committees, including the National Republican Congressional Committee, the Congressional Leadership Fund, the Republican National Committee and America First Action Super PAC spent over $9 million in the election. Although the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee invested over $1 million in the race, that spending was dwarfed by the conservative groups. And this was all for a race in a district that won’t even exist in November, since the State Supreme Court order that the map be redrawn. Republicans’ financial advantage in this arena, contrasted with Democrats’ investment in individual candidates, is not surprising. As of last month, the RNC had $38.8 million in cash on hand, while the Democratic National Committee had $423,000, and was saddled with $6.1 million in debt. But in the final quarter of 2017, over 40 Democratic challengers out-raised more than 30 House incumbents, according to figures from the Federal Election Commission touted by the DCCC. But experts say the results in PA-18 reveal how this spending strategy could preview a problem for the upcoming midterm elections this fall. Independent groups have to spend more money airing television ads, since FCC regulations give candidates the lowest rates to run an ad. And, as Krumholz noted, it is always more likely that the contributors powering the candidates, particularly in House races, are actual voters, than the big name donors financing these outside groups. “There’s no question that Republicans will always have more outside money than Democrats do,” said Josh Schwerin, Communications Director at Priorities USA, an advocacy group which has a Super PAC arm that invests in Democratic candidate. It did not invest in Pennsylvania’s election. “If you look across the playing field, especially in the House, Democrats are outraising Republicans and sitting Congressmen .. what we saw in PA-18 and will be likely replicated across the country in a November is that every dollar a candidate spends goes further than a dollar the outside group spends. A Republican operative with one of the outside groups had similar sentiments. “Outside groups have strong value and are able to get candidates over the finish line, but we’re not able to subsidize these campaigns,” said the operative. “Absent critical spending, \[outside groups\] can only do so much.” It appears that GOP groups may be realizing the extent of this problem. Steve Law, President and CEO of the Senate Leadership Fund, [told the _Washington Post_](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/03/14/top-gop-super-pac-urges-donors-to-step-up-direct-support-for-candidates/?utm%5Fterm=.576748000502) his Super Pac is amping up efforts to encourage donors to contribute directly to candidates. And Rep. Steve Stivers, chairman of the NRCC, urged his colleagues to up their campaigning games in a closed door meeting Wednesday. “This is a wake-up call,” said Stivers. “Bear down.” _—Philip Elliott contributed reporting._ ## Transcript [00:00] Took a little longer than we thought, but we did it. [00:02] [ NOISE ] [ APPLAUSE ] [ MUSIC ] [00:14] I've heard it Conor, the job you are running for is The [00:18] House of Representatives, so if you get down there, do [00:22] the job, do the job. [ APPLAUSE ] [00:31] OK, I will, mission [01:00] accepted. [ APPLAUSE ] [ MUSIC ] [ MUSIC ] You know [01:03] we're still fighting the fight, it's not over yet, we're [01:06] gonna fight all the way to the end. You [01:11] know I never give up, you know my first race went into [01:14] the night, and we won that, and my second race was [01:17] Same way. We're kind of used to this now, right? [01:30] [ MUSIC ] [ MUSIC ] [ BLANK_AUDIO ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/"},"headline":"The Pennsylvania Special Election Exposed a Big Flaw in GOP Campaign Spending","datePublished":"2018-03-14T22:00:28.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-12T09:02:48.066Z","description":"The GOP's advantage in outside spending may not matter as much anymore","url":"https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/","keywords":["Congress","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08f83c9fb32aa4f2/69892aca656a3f330abd3daf/gettyimages-931685076.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alana Abramson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alana-abramson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt08f83c9fb32aa4f2/69892aca656a3f330abd3daf/gettyimages-931685076.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Conor Lamb, Democratic congressional candidate for Pennsylvania's 18th district, speaks to supporters at an election night rally March 14, 2018 in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.","caption":"Conor Lamb, Democratic congressional candidate for Pennsylvania's 18th district, speaks to supporters at an election night rally March 14, 2018 in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.","creditText":"Drew Angerer—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/","name":"The Pennsylvania Special Election Exposed a Big Flaw in GOP Campaign Spending"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Republican Rick Saccone Concedes Pennsylvania Special Election to Democrat Conor Lamb","description":"Democrat Conor Lamb is declaring victory in a southwestern Pennsylvania congressional election that is rocking the political landscape ahead of the November midterm elections.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/5F89b6SX/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2018-03-14T08:41:32.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/5F89b6SX.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/","duration":"PT1M35S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/5197880/pennsylvania-special-election-republican-donors/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```