--- title: Free Speech, Forced Speech and the Right to Silence description: Here is a challenge for our polarized age: If you value the right to speak freely, then what about the right not to? The right... canonical: https://time.com/5180703/free-speech-forced-speech-and-the-right-to-silence/ author: Nancy Gibbs article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2018-03-01T13:27:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T11:31:11.936Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Free Speech, Forced Speech and the Right to Silence og:description: Here is a challenge for our polarized age: If you value the right to speak freely, then what about the right not to? The right... og:url: https://time.com/5180703/free-speech-forced-speech-and-the-right-to-silence/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83fcea73e96c61be/69892937db2987974925eecc/gettyimages-902403446.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5472 og:image:height: 3078 og:image:alt: The 2018 InStyle And Warner Bros. 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards Post-Party - Red Carpet og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Free Speech, Forced Speech and the Right to Silence twitter:description: Here is a challenge for our polarized age: If you value the right to speak freely, then what about the right not to? The right... twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83fcea73e96c61be/69892937db2987974925eecc/gettyimages-902403446.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Free Speech, Forced Speech and the Right to Silence > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=1abf649a-043c-4baf-a4f0-e9bd052c179a&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=1abf649a-043c-4baf-a4f0-e9bd052c179a&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=1abf649a-043c-4baf-a4f0-e9bd052c179a&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=1abf649a-043c-4baf-a4f0-e9bd052c179a&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1)  by [Nancy Gibbs](https://time.com/author/nancy-gibbs/)  ## Nancy Gibbs Mar 1, 2018 1:27 PM UTC  ( L-R) Actor Meryl Streep, activist Ai-Jen Poo, actor Natalie Portman, activist Tarana Burke, actors Michelle Williams, America Ferrera, Jessica Chastain, Amy Poehler and activist Saru Jayaraman attend the 2018 InStyle and Warner Bros. 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards Post-Party at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on Jan. 7, 2018. ( L-R) Actor Meryl Streep, activist Ai-Jen Poo, actor Natalie Portman, activist Tarana Burke, actors Michelle Williams, America Ferrera, Jessica Chastain, Amy Poehler and activist Saru Jayaraman attend the 2018 InStyle and Warner Bros. 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards Post-Party at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on Jan. 7, 2018. Joe Scarnici—InStyle/Getty Images  by [Nancy Gibbs](https://time.com/author/nancy-gibbs/)  ## Nancy Gibbs Mar 1, 2018 1:27 PM UTC Here is a challenge for our polarized age: If you value the right to speak freely, then what about the right not to? The right to express any opinion or none at all, to inflame an audience by what you say, or what you refuse to say. Surely these rights are knit together: tug at either one, and the fabric of freedom unravels. All this is on my mind as the [Academy Awards approach](http://time.com/5112407/oscar-nominations-2018/), a celebration of artistic expression that typically invites other kinds as well. [Oscar-night politics](http://time.com/5178220/ryan-seacrest-red-carpet-coverage-oscars-2018-despite-sexual-abuse-allegations/) mirror the moral battles of the age; Black Lives Matter, #MeToo and now the Parkland tragedy promise that people will be speaking their minds, and I’ll defend to the end their right to do so, for comics to be serious and actors authentic in the expression of their views, against critics who tell them to “stay in their lanes.” But I also defend their right to silence. And here I’m concerned not just with the stage, but the carpet–the red one. For high-profile events, from the Golden Globes to the State of the Union, women were urged to wear a certain emblem or color–black in those cases–to protest sexual misconduct. In a year when we have explored the exorbitant human cost of silence, the momentum naturally builds for everyone to take a stand, tell a story, stake a claim. Such a campaign can signal seriousness and scale–up until people are denounced for what they chose not to wear, not to say. We can admire those who speak out without judging those who do not. Kate Winslet was scorned for initially failing to scorn Woody Allen. Taylor Swift was criticized for condemning sexual harassment without denouncing Donald Trump. “One of the world’s biggest pop stars doesn’t want to talk about politics,” ran the Politico headline. “Is that O.K.?” Not these days. America in 2018 is so politically active, so enraged, that you sense a growing suspicion of those who remain on the sidelines. Saying nothing has always been a swampy moral ground. Silence, Plato said, gives consent. Yet not all challenges offer such clear moral choices. In the face of absolute rights and absolute wrongs, there are myriad ways to respond. And then there are issues whose moral boundaries we are still exploring, including our current debate over sexual conduct and misconduct. About the monsters, there is no argument. But ever since the Harvey Weinstein revelations, an immense, intense, highly personal and yet profoundly political debate has unfolded about conduct and consent. At least in private, people admit that they aren’t entirely sure how to map this territory. Which brings me back to the carpet. The women who did not wear black to the Golden Globes faced a new context. “This is a moment of solidarity,” actor Eva Longoria told the New York Times, “not a fashion moment.” But is it so black and white? What about Meher Tatna, president of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, who wore red in honor of her mother and her Indian heritage? “When you have a celebration, you don’t wear black,” she told Entertainment Tonight. “She would be appalled if I were to \[have\] worn black.” Nuance is all but outlawed on Twitter. Of all the weapons of social media, shame is among the most promiscuously brandished. Actor Blanca Blanco pushed back against criticism of her red dress: “Shaming is part of the problem,” she tweeted. “The issue is bigger than my dress color #TIMESUP.” Of course for many the issue is simply Trump and Trumpism. The President made it clear the rules of public discourse would be changing. He has delivered a profusion of invective, disruption and therefore delight to the supporters who relish any kind of speech that makes the left crazy. Progressives have come back loud and strong, introducing pussy hats and Time’s Up pins and athletes on bended knee, alt-means of alt-communication to counter the strange distortions that define the Age of Trump. But symbolism, for all its power, invites misinterpretation. NFL players learned this when their pregame protests against police brutality were recast as opposition to country. Does a black dress on the red carpet signal mourning and loss? Is the message that fashion is frivolous and conformity righteous? Sometimes silence is wrong. Sometimes it is golden. But it is usually mysterious, defined by what it does not say, does not mean. Sometimes we choose silence now because we will soon be shouting, and are saving our voice. Sometimes we choose silence over shallowness, as we search for the right words, at the right time. Respect for restraint is a democratic value as well, but a harder right to defend in this age of constant contact and brittle trust. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5180703/free-speech-forced-speech-and-the-right-to-silence/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5180703/free-speech-forced-speech-and-the-right-to-silence/"},"headline":"Free Speech, Forced Speech and the Right to Silence","datePublished":"2018-03-01T13:27:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T11:31:11.936Z","description":"Here is a challenge for our polarized age: If you value the right to speak freely, then what about the right not to? The right...","url":"https://time.com/5180703/free-speech-forced-speech-and-the-right-to-silence/","keywords":["free speech","Academy Awards","Viewpoint","MeToo"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83fcea73e96c61be/69892937db2987974925eecc/gettyimages-902403446.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nancy Gibbs","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/nancy-gibbs/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt83fcea73e96c61be/69892937db2987974925eecc/gettyimages-902403446.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"The 2018 InStyle And Warner Bros. 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards Post-Party - Red Carpet","caption":"The 2018 InStyle And Warner Bros. 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards Post-Party - Red Carpet","creditText":"Joe Scarnici—InStyle/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/free-speech/","name":"free speech"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5180703/free-speech-forced-speech-and-the-right-to-silence/","name":"Free Speech, Forced Speech and the Right to Silence"}}]}] ```