--- title: The GOP Reaction to Roy Moore Allegations Is a Problem description: 7 reasons why it's problematic that many Republicans reacted to the Roy Moore sexual abuse allegations with "if true, he should step aside." canonical: https://time.com/5018761/roy-moore-sexual-assault-allegations-congress-reaction/ author: TIME article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-11-10T18:25:27.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T18:11:52.611Z article:section: Politics og:title: 7 Problems With the GOP’s Reaction to the Roy Moore Allegations og:description: The Senate candidate is accused of sexually abusing a minor og:url: https://time.com/5018761/roy-moore-sexual-assault-allegations-congress-reaction/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt608b5830adf15590/6988e54fe76ad2cead62fe74/roy-moore-alabama-senate-republican-sexual-contact-girls.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: President Trump, Conservative Leaders Address Value Voters Summit og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: 7 Problems With the GOP’s Reaction to the Roy Moore Allegations twitter:description: The Senate candidate is accused of sexually abusing a minor twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt608b5830adf15590/6988e54fe76ad2cead62fe74/roy-moore-alabama-senate-republican-sexual-contact-girls.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # 7 Problems With the GOP’s ‘If True, Roy Moore Should Step Aside’ Stance > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=bf5fd745-210f-4f5d-b7e6-d68a43639fe2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=bf5fd745-210f-4f5d-b7e6-d68a43639fe2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=bf5fd745-210f-4f5d-b7e6-d68a43639fe2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=bf5fd745-210f-4f5d-b7e6-d68a43639fe2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Ryan Teague Beckwith](https://time.com/author/ryan-teague-beckwith/) ## Ryan Teague Beckwith Nov 10, 2017 6:25 PM UTC  Roy Moore, GOP Senate candidate and former chief justice on the Alabama Supreme Court speaks during the annual Family Research Council's Values Voter Summit at the Omni Shorham Hotel on Oct. 13, 2017 in Washington, D.C. Roy Moore, GOP Senate candidate and former chief justice on the Alabama Supreme Court speaks during the annual Family Research Council's Values Voter Summit at the Omni Shorham Hotel on Oct. 13, 2017 in Washington, D.C. Mark Wilson—Getty Images by [Ryan Teague Beckwith](https://time.com/author/ryan-teague-beckwith/) ## Ryan Teague Beckwith Nov 10, 2017 6:25 PM UTC When [allegations of sexual misconduct](http://time.com/5017542/roy-moore-sexual-contact-underage-senate/) about Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore surfaced, many Republican lawmakers [offered a variation](http://time.com/5018721/roy-moore-alabama-republican-party/) on this line: If the story is true, he should step aside. “If these allegations are true, he must step aside,” said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. “If they are true, Judge Moore should immediately withdraw,” said Texas Sen. Ted Cruz. “If there is any shred of truth to the allegations against Roy Moore, he should step aside immediately,” said Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake. There’s a reason that so many lawmakers relied on the same phrase to respond to the news. It’s a well-worn response to allegations of misconduct that keeps the elected official’s options open if the scandal either blows over or turns into a career-ender. (Moore has denied the allegations and so far has indicated he intends to keep running.) But in light of a spate of [recent revelations of sexual harassment](http://time.com/5012697/men-waking-up/), sexual misconduct and sexual assault, the phrase may no longer be the right response for politicians seeking to avoid looking tone deaf on the issue. Here’s a look at seven reasons why “if true, he should step aside” is problematic. ## It takes no stand on the truth of the allegations The [Washington _Post_ story](https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/woman-says-roy-moore-initiated-sexual-encounter-when-she-was-14-he-was-32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0%5Fstory.html?utm%5Fterm=.2bd992109e69) which revealed the allegations involves interviews with more than 30 people, court records which backed up key details from the accounts and four women who independently volunteered their stories.” Saying “if these allegations are true” begs the question of what more evidence the elected official would need to make a determination. To be fair, elected officials had only a single news story to go on when they gave that response — and many had not had time to read it thoroughly and carefully — and nothing has been proven in a court of law. But politicians are called on to make decisions based on incomplete information all the time, as former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney noted in his response. > [](https://twitter.com/MittRomney/status/928999549376528385) ## It implicitly doubts the victims’ testimony As other scandals have shown, many victims of harassment and assault fear that they won’t be believed. Responding to four separate women’s accounts of improper behavior by saying “if true” has unfortunate echoes of that disbelief and furthers the sense among other victims of other misconduct that they also won’t be believed. Again, it’s understandable that politicians might want to hedge on a story that’s just broken, but there are other ways to phrase this, such as by calling for further investigation into the accusations. “If true” feels too much like a shrug, even if it’s not intended that way. ## It offers no solace to the victims Elected officials are going to be asked about the accused, so it’s natural that is how they respond. But “if true, he should step aside” also offers nothing aimed at the victims. (To be fair, some officials have made remarks along those lines.) A better response would include some words of support for those who suffered the harm. ## It implicitly leaves the truth up to the accused The other side effect of “if true” is that it puts the responsibility for determining whether the events in question on the accused. If they admit that they did what they are accused of, then it’s true. But it leaves open the possibility that they could deny everything, call their accusers liars and still be accepted at a later date. Of course, there’s a reason why elected officials might want to leave the question open. For one, they don’t have all the facts yet. Further reporting or investigation might reveal more to the story. But in many cases, it’s more a test of whether the accused can weather the storm and still get elected. If so, then the allegations will be implicitly treated as though they were not true. Not all politicians treated the allegations this way, it should be noted. Sen. John McCain was blunt. > [](https://twitter.com/SenJohnMcCain/status/928709913953624066) ## It leaves the punishment at the discretion of the accused The second half of the formulation, “he should step aside,” also leaves the power in the hands of the accused. Even in cases where the candidate alone can determine if they continue a campaign, it’s the least active response. For example, an elected official could urge voters to pick their opponent or write-in someone else or they could refuse to work with a candidate even if they are elected. ## It keeps the focus on the politics of the situation, rather than the harm To be fair, the question that elected officials face is what should happen politically. But again, the focus of “if true, he should step aside” is the narrow question of the accused’s political fate. It’s far different than saying that the accused should seek professional help or apologize to the victims or even make amends in some way. ## It might make the accused less likely to step aside By putting the truth up for grabs and leaving the punishment to the discretion of the accused, the remark also ironically makes it less likely that the candidate would actually step aside because doing so would essentially be admitting guilt. That makes it more likely the candidate will deny the accusations and stay in the race. In summary, there are a lot of reasons why politicians from both parties have often relied on this well-worn phrase to respond to allegations of sexual misconduct. But the political environment has changed in the past year. It might be time for politicians to develop a new stock answer. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5018761/roy-moore-sexual-assault-allegations-congress-reaction/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5018761/roy-moore-sexual-assault-allegations-congress-reaction/"},"headline":"7 Problems With the GOP’s ‘If True, Roy Moore Should Step Aside’ Stance","datePublished":"2017-11-10T18:25:27.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T18:11:52.611Z","description":"7 reasons why it's problematic that many Republicans reacted to the Roy Moore sexual abuse allegations with \"if true, he should step aside.\"","url":"https://time.com/5018761/roy-moore-sexual-assault-allegations-congress-reaction/","keywords":["Congress","Sexual Assault","sexual harassment","Roy Moore"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt608b5830adf15590/6988e54fe76ad2cead62fe74/roy-moore-alabama-senate-republican-sexual-contact-girls.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ryan Teague Beckwith","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/ryan-teague-beckwith/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt608b5830adf15590/6988e54fe76ad2cead62fe74/roy-moore-alabama-senate-republican-sexual-contact-girls.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"President Trump, Conservative Leaders Address Value Voters Summit","caption":"President Trump, Conservative Leaders Address Value Voters Summit","creditText":"Mark Wilson—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5018761/roy-moore-sexual-assault-allegations-congress-reaction/","name":"7 Problems With the GOP’s ‘If True, Roy Moore Should Step Aside’ Stance"}}]}] ```