<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/5003084/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentence-hearing/" -->

---
title: Bowe Bergdahl Deserves Our Empathy for Deserting
description: I have come to realize that his imperfections should not deprive him of his rights, and this has made it harder for me to condemn him.
canonical: https://time.com/5003084/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentence-hearing/
author: Andy Owen
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2017-10-31T16:29:27.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T18:03:00.588Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Bowe Bergdahl Deserves Our Empathy
og:description: Why does desertion outweigh psychological trauma and moral intentions?
og:url: https://time.com/5003084/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentence-hearing/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt53072f6fa6ac1dee/6988e2e486f68eafbc6e6f2b/bergdahl_wong-1.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 3000
og:image:height: 1688
og:image:alt: Bergdahl
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Bowe Bergdahl Deserves Our Empathy
twitter:description: Why does desertion outweigh psychological trauma and moral intentions?
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt53072f6fa6ac1dee/6988e2e486f68eafbc6e6f2b/bergdahl_wong-1.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt53072f6fa6ac1dee/6988e2e486f68eafbc6e6f2b/bergdahl_wong-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Bowe Bergdahl Deserves Our Empathy

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="c527c3a9-62ca-4130-bb1e-07a30209ca10" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c527c3a9-62ca-4130-bb1e-07a30209ca10&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c527c3a9-62ca-4130-bb1e-07a30209ca10&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=c527c3a9-62ca-4130-bb1e-07a30209ca10&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c527c3a9-62ca-4130-bb1e-07a30209ca10&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Andy Owen](https://time.com/author/andy-owen/)


## Andy Owen


Oct 31, 2017 4:29 PM UTC

![Bergdahl](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt53072f6fa6ac1dee/6988e2e486f68eafbc6e6f2b/bergdahl_wong-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

In this Sept. 27, 2017, file photo, Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl leaves a motions hearing during a lunch break in Fort Bragg, N.C.

In this Sept. 27, 2017, file photo, Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl leaves a motions hearing during a lunch break in Fort Bragg, N.C. Andrew Craft—AP

by 

[Andy Owen](https://time.com/author/andy-owen/)


## Andy Owen


Oct 31, 2017 4:29 PM UTC

On October 23, the long-awaited [sentencing of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl](http://time.com/4972398/bowe-bergdahl-guilty-plea-desertion-trial/) for his desertion whilst serving in Afghanistan began. He had pleaded guilty.

In an interview with the podcast “[Serial](http://time.com/4143790/serial-bowe-bergdahl-desertion/)“_,_ a member of Bergdahl’s company named John Thurman said “we all experienced the same thing, but we didn’t walk off.” For Thurman and other soldiers, many of whom went searching for [him in treacherous territory](http://time.com/4144493/serial-new-season-bowe-bergdahl/), risking life and limb, Bergdahl broke a sacred bond. “That is not something you can ever come back from,” he continued. “You walked off and you betrayed us.”

For me, a former British soldier who served in [Afghanistan](http://time.com/4911492/trump-afghanistan-military-victory/), my gut reaction to hearing of Bergdahl’s desertion was similar. It pricked that sense of betrayal in me, even from afar. But that was before I had heard Alan Juniper’s story.

Juniper was a British conscript in the [Second World War](http://time.com/4815170/wwii-nationalism-donald-trump-america-first/). After 551 days of fighting a series of confused retreats in North Africa, he deserted. He became one of approximately 100,000 British and 50,000 U.S. deserters in that war. Arrested, he was thrown in military prison. He later volunteered to return to the fighting in Italy. After experiencing further intense combat, he again reached his limit and [deserted](http://time.com/3759691/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-prisoner-exchange/). A broken man, he stumbled into a village whose sons had been fighting against the Allies only weeks previously. Unlike Bergdahl, Juniper was not captured by a foe; instead, he became a member of the community.

The battalion war diary, the diaries of other soldiers and family recollections took me through every day of Juniper’s story. He was eventually diagnosed with [PTSD](http://motto.time.com/4557267/veterans-day-ptsd/) in his eighties. There was an incident he kept returning to in flashbacks: a time when he was trapped during a heavy bombardment in the desert. A shell landed in the doorway of the bunker. But it didn’t explode. It just lodged there as the bombardment continued. It seems highly likely that when he deserted he was an undiagnosed psychological casualty.


An Army Sanity Board determined that Bergdahl had schizotypal personality disorder “at the time of the alleged criminal conduct.” This should be considered. But to do so, it requires us to reconcile the perception of “good” psychiatric casualties with “bad” deserters. This is made more complex by the fact that Bergdahl claims he left his post to prove his commanders were “unfit” — essentially for a moral reason. Bergdahl could be a so-called bad deserter with both good psychiatric and good moral cause for forgiveness. Why do we consider desertion more important than the other two factors?

Most WWII deserters were frontline troops like Juniper. Charles Glass in his 2013 nonfiction book [_The Deserters: A Hidden History of World War II_](https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1594204284/ref=as%5Fli%5Fqf%5Fasin%5Fil%5Ftl?ie=UTF8&tag=time037-20&creative=9325&linkCode=as2&creativeASIN=1594204284&linkId=5d9c2147c1c30df83b6ecdf65025da8d) claims that “for the most part they left the lines because they’d had nervous breakdowns…Too much shelling, close friends killed… the daily stresses were too much.” Glass notes that “few deserters were cowards” and claims the people who “showed the greatest sympathy to deserters were other frontline soldiers. They had, at one time or another, felt the temptation.”


The common reason soldiers give for why they stay is “each other.” You fight for the soldiers next to you — not ideology, country or president. Deserting breaks this bond. But for the rest of us, it goes farther. We also see soldiers who desert as breaking their bond with society.

We make a moral choice for soldiers: We expect them to sacrifice their individual rights out of duty. But this has metastasized into an incorrect belief that there is something inherently unethical about desertion. Now, when we make that moral choice for soldiers, we often assume that the sacrifice is total, and in doing so we neglect the other half of that equation: that duty is also limited by individual rights.

Soldiers are prepared to forfeit their right to life; in exchange, they have expectations of their leaders. They expect them to clearly define the mission and then provide the tools, support and example needed to give them a reasonable chance of successfully achieving that mission. Bergdahl has claimed that he had no faith in his leaders’ ability to protect his rights and those of the men next to him; his only way to do so with reasonable expectation of success, he has argued, was to desert. It is fair to suggest that there were less extreme ways to make his point — ways that would not put fellow soldiers at risk. But at the root of this desire are the morals we ourselves expect of soldiers.


Bergdahl’s decision also in some ways echoes the accusation most difficult to defend about Juniper’s desertion: that if many others had done the same, the Allies would have lost. Without the sacrifice of those who stayed to fight, evil would have won. But Juniper did more than many and was often let down by his commanders. He fought until he reached his limit. Many did more and are rightly lauded, but what of those who reached their limit — does their desertion make them villains? Many who have not been staged in a remote outpost underestimate the magnitude of the [psychological stress](http://time.com/4519606/afghanistan-war-veteran-video/) it can cause. According to the Army Sanity Board, in Bergdahl’s case that stress was applied to an already fragile mind.

As with Bergdahl, nobody considers Juniper anything better than imperfect. But I have come to realize that his imperfections should not deprive him of his rights, and this has made it harder for me to condemn him. I hope we can come to see Bergdahl in this light, [before we judge him](http://time.com/4992808/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentencing-afghanistan-taliban/).

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/5003084/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentence-hearing/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/5003084/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentence-hearing/"},"headline":"Bowe Bergdahl Deserves Our Empathy","datePublished":"2017-10-31T16:29:27.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T18:03:00.588Z","description":"I have come to realize that his imperfections should not deprive him of his rights, and this has made it harder for me to condemn him.","url":"https://time.com/5003084/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentence-hearing/","keywords":["justice","war"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt53072f6fa6ac1dee/6988e2e486f68eafbc6e6f2b/bergdahl_wong-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Andy Owen","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/andy-owen/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt53072f6fa6ac1dee/6988e2e486f68eafbc6e6f2b/bergdahl_wong-1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Bergdahl","caption":"Bergdahl","creditText":"Andrew Craft—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/justice/","name":"justice"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/5003084/bowe-bergdahl-desertion-sentence-hearing/","name":"Bowe Bergdahl Deserves Our Empathy"}}]}]
```

