--- title: Jeff Flake: Republicans Are ‘Willing Accomplices’ to Trump description: The Republican Senator for Arizona writes that in the 2016 election, conservatives abandoned their principles for cheap, dangerous ideas canonical: https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/ author: Jeff Flake article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-08-02T19:15:44.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:42:05.338Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Jeff Flake: Republicans Are ‘Willing Accomplices’ to Trump’s Destruction og:description: The Arizona Senator writes that in 2016 conservatives went for "cheap and easy" ideas og:url: https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt15d104678f228231/6988d82f656a3f0b0abd1180/donald-trump-news-twitter-republicans-congress-convervatives-jeff-flake-book.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5179 og:image:height: 2913 og:image:alt: Republican Presidential Nominee Donald Trump Holds Election Night Event In New York City og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Jeff Flake: Republicans Are ‘Willing Accomplices’ to Trump’s Destruction twitter:description: The Arizona Senator writes that in 2016 conservatives went for "cheap and easy" ideas twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt15d104678f228231/6988d82f656a3f0b0abd1180/donald-trump-news-twitter-republicans-congress-convervatives-jeff-flake-book.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Sen. Jeff Flake: Republicans Are ‘Willing Accomplices’ in Betraying American Ideals > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6c7d77cf-4f91-4e96-b4bc-71781e4d0697&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6c7d77cf-4f91-4e96-b4bc-71781e4d0697&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=6c7d77cf-4f91-4e96-b4bc-71781e4d0697&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: How Donald Trump Views Loyalty [Watch (HLS stream): How Donald Trump Views Loyalty](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/SR0YNj1U.m3u8) (1:54)  _Published 2017-07-28. If there's one thing that Donald Trump values, it's loyalty. He's placed an emphasis on it throughout his life, and he consistently requires it of those who surround him. Often, his brand of loyalty can be a one-way street._ by [Jeff Flake](https://time.com/author/jeff-flake/) ## Jeff Flake Aug 2, 2017 7:15 PM UTC  Republican president-elect Donald Trump delivers his acceptance speech during his election night event at the New York Hilton Midtown in the early morning hours of November 9, 2016 in New York City. Republican president-elect Donald Trump delivers his acceptance speech during his election night event at the New York Hilton Midtown in the early morning hours of November 9, 2016 in New York City. Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images by [Jeff Flake](https://time.com/author/jeff-flake/) ## Jeff Flake Aug 2, 2017 7:15 PM UTC Never has a party so quickly or easily abandoned its core principles as my party did in the course of the [2016 campaign](http://time.com/4565967/the-dirtiest-election-ever/). And when you suddenly decide that you don’t believe what had recently been your most deeply held beliefs, then you open yourself to believing anything — or maybe nothing at all. Following the lead of a candidate who had a special skill for identifying problems, if not for solving them, we lurched like a tranquilized elephant from a broad consensus on economic philosophy and free trade that had held for generations to an incoherent and often untrue mash of back-of-the-envelope populist slogans. Seemingly overnight. Seemingly overnight, we became willing to roll back the ideas on the global economy that have given America the highest standard of living in history and lifted hundreds of millions of others from poverty all over the world. Seemingly overnight, we became willing to jettison the strategic alliances that have spared us global conflict since World War II. Seemingly overnight, we gave in to powerful nativist impulses that have arisen in the face of fear and insecurity over the swiftly evolving global economy. Seemingly overnight, we stopped speaking the language of _freedom_ and started speaking the language of _power_. Seemingly overnight, reckless, outrageous and undignified behavior became excused and countenanced as “telling it like it is,” when it was actually just reckless, outrageous and undignified. Seemingly overnight, the word _globalist_ became a grave insult among people in my party who also called themselves “conservative.” I remember a right-wing blog post during my election to the Senate that said that I had “been seen in the company of globalists in Paris, France.” _Quel scandale!_ Globalist as opposed to what, exactly? A provincialist? A parochialist? A localist? In this country, we are less than 5 percent of the world’s population. We are 20 percent of the world’s economic output. And if we don’t trade, we don’t grow. Given the alternatives, I’ll take the globalist moniker, thank you. Seemingly overnight, we became defined not by the limitless aspirations of a free people but by our grievances and resentments and our lowest common denominators. Rather than leaning in to the economy of the future, this nativist vision would have us clambering to reclaim an economy of the past — an economy, by the way, that even if it were possible to somehow reconstitute would make no sense in the twenty-first century. Why did we do that? And how did it happen? How did conservatives betray conservatism? Or worse: How did we embrace incoherence? It will likely take historians decades to figure out why, exactly, but political expediency and self-justification are time-honored traditions in politics, and they offer a good place to start any serious historical analysis of this particular conservative crack-up. The quick answer: We did it because it was cheap and easy and the real world is hard and defending a principled position to voters is harder still. In every political movement there is always evolution and drift. And there are also inflection points — the hinges of history, when big changes happen — political realignments, resource conflicts, civil rights struggles, industrial and technological revolutions, waves of global economic connectivity and upheaval. All of these forces can set parties floating like continents away from or into each other — tearing them apart or forming new ones. Over the past century, we have even seen our two major parties reverse roles on some of the biggest issues America has ever faced. But those transformations were gradual, organic to other tectonic social changes taking place at the time, and took decades, even generations, to play out. During the campaign of 2016, on the other hand, committed lifelong free-market conservatives, with their fingers to the wind, took no time at all to dispense with principle and be r born as “fair traders” or “populists.” All in an effort to chase our own pied piper, who admittedly seemed expert at mapping the nation’s anxieties. Adapting the happy talk of a charismatic outsider was a lot easier than explaining, defending and persuading voters of the things we actually believed. Conservatives love to mock liberals for offering “free stuff” from the government, but what was our 2016 campaign if not that? In politics, it is difficult to win an argument with complexity and facts when the other side offers easy answers and free stuff without worrying about the details. This is largely how [Donald Trump](http://time.com/tag/donald-trump/) vanquished the Republican field in 2016\. A tone that many of his supporters took for candor — _Our leaders are so stupid! I alone can fix it!_ — combined with easy answers to hard questions, sweetened by free stuff. Candidate Trump was giving — and we, the Republican electorate, bought — the late-night infomercial: “Health Care for Everybody! Much Better, at a Fraction of the Cost! Free Border Wall! Super-Colossal Trade Deals! But Wait! There’s More!!” Free, yes. But also free of significant thought. The explanation for how the party of free trade went along with a candidate who came out against free trade — alternately describing himself as a free trader and a fair trader, eager for trade wars, threatening tariffs, calling for border taxes and coming out against most multilateral trade agreements ever negotiated — is quite simple: We conservatives too often didn’t have the courage of our convictions. Call us willing accomplices. The instant a flashy new novelty act came along, shredding conservative orthodoxy in the name of “telling it like it is,” we bailed. The specter of winning arguments in the public sphere on the strength of our ideas proved too daunting.  _Excerpted from_ [_Conscience of a Conservative_](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0399592911/?tag=timecom-20) _by Jeff Flake. Copyright © 2017 by Jeff Flake. Excerpted by permission of Random House. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher._ ## Transcript As the Scout Law says, a scout is trustworthy, loyal, we could use some more loyalty, I will tell you that. If there's one thing that Donald Trump values, its loyalty. Even before he got into politics, the president liked to talk about how much he prized loyalty, dedicating an entire chapter to it in one of this business books. [ MUSIC ] [ MUSIC ] During the campaign, he asked people at rallies to raise their right hands and swear their support for him, a move he later said was just for fun. Raise you right hand. Vote, on or before, the 12th For Donald J. Trump for President. As President, he's repeatedly returned to the subject. Trump has even pressed subordinates for loyalty at times when it would be considered inappropriate. [ MUSIC ] But for Trump, loyalty can be a one way street. Some of the most loyal members of the Trump campaign didn't get jobs in his administration. I'm proud to endorse Donald Trump for the next president of the United States. New Jersey Governor Chris Christie was even replaced as head of the transition team once Trump won. Attorney General Jeff Sessions was one of the first major politicians to endorse Trump during the election. And together We will make America great again. But lately, Trump has harshly criticized him for recusing himself from the Russia investigation, even indicating that he might fire Sessions. I told you before, I'm very disappointed with the Attorney General, but we will see what happens. Time will tell. Time will tell. Trump may demand loyalty, but his reluctance to return it will only make it harder to get in the future. [ MUSIC ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/"},"headline":"Sen. Jeff Flake: Republicans Are ‘Willing Accomplices’ in Betraying American Ideals","datePublished":"2017-08-02T19:15:44.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:42:05.338Z","description":"The Arizona Senator writes that in 2016 conservatives went for \"cheap and easy\" ideas","url":"https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/","keywords":["politics","Books","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt15d104678f228231/6988d82f656a3f0b0abd1180/donald-trump-news-twitter-republicans-congress-convervatives-jeff-flake-book.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeff Flake","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jeff-flake/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt15d104678f228231/6988d82f656a3f0b0abd1180/donald-trump-news-twitter-republicans-congress-convervatives-jeff-flake-book.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Republican Presidential Nominee Donald Trump Holds Election Night Event In New York City","caption":"Republican Presidential Nominee Donald Trump Holds Election Night Event In New York City","creditText":"Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/","name":"Sen. Jeff Flake: Republicans Are ‘Willing Accomplices’ in Betraying American Ideals"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"How Donald Trump Views Loyalty","description":"If there's one thing that Donald Trump values, it's loyalty. He's placed an emphasis on it throughout his life, and he consistently requires it of those who surround him. Often, his brand of loyalty can be a one-way street.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/SR0YNj1U/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2017-07-28T21:01:27.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/SR0YNj1U.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/","duration":"PT1M54S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4884407/jeff-flake-donald-trump-2016-election-republicans-congress-conservatives/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```