--- title: James Comey: Testimony Won't Give All Trump, Russia Answers description: Former FBI Director James Comey's testimony will reveal little about whether Russia colluded with the President Trump's campaign canonical: https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/ author: Elizabeth Goitein article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-06-07T15:09:40.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:49:10.125Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why James Comey’s Testimony Won’t Give All the Answers We Need og:description: There are important questions about Russia and the President that Congress will not ask og:url: https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecbebfb66a7d8cd2/6988ccdf7cdbacc2d6d58501/gettyimages-681336342.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3600 og:image:height: 2025 og:image:alt: FBI Director James Comey - Washington, DC og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why James Comey’s Testimony Won’t Give All the Answers We Need twitter:description: There are important questions about Russia and the President that Congress will not ask twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecbebfb66a7d8cd2/6988ccdf7cdbacc2d6d58501/gettyimages-681336342.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why James Comey’s Testimony Won’t Give All the Answers We Need > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3dfaa33b-7d4b-4c09-b867-0f0a12b71c05&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=3dfaa33b-7d4b-4c09-b867-0f0a12b71c05&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=3dfaa33b-7d4b-4c09-b867-0f0a12b71c05&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: White House Will Not Invoke Executive Privilege in Comey Testimony [Watch (HLS stream): White House Will Not Invoke Executive Privilege in Comey Testimony](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/t5kOqQ1L.m3u8) (0:17)  _Published 2017-06-05. President Trump will not invoke executive privilege to block the testimony of ousted FBI Director James Comey, the White House said Monday._ by [Elizabeth Goitein](https://time.com/author/elizabeth-goitein/) ## Elizabeth Goitein Elizabeth Goitein is a senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law Jun 7, 2017 3:09 PM UTC  James Comey in Washington, D.C., on May 3, 2017. James Comey in Washington, D.C., on May 3, 2017. Matt McClain—The Washington Post/Getty Images by [Elizabeth Goitein](https://time.com/author/elizabeth-goitein/) ## Elizabeth Goitein Elizabeth Goitein is a senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law Jun 7, 2017 3:09 PM UTC Plenty of Americans will be breaking out the popcorn for tomorrow’s must-watch Congressional testimony by [James Comey](http://time.com/4808091/donald-trump-james-comey-testimony-luck/). The recently fired [FBI Director](http://time.com/4808098/donald-trump-jared-kushner-famous-comey/) has a habit of [making news](http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/fbi-director-doesnt-recommend-charges-against-hillary-clinton/index.html) when he testifies, often using congressional hearings to debut [major revelations](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/15/AR2007051500864.html). Even though he’ll be careful not to editorialize too much — he is highly protective of his reputation and will want to avoid anything that looks like payback for his pink slip — simply answering lawmakers’ questions could still elicit quite a show. But the spectacle shouldn’t distract us from the seriousness of the underlying issues. While the entertainment value of the [Trump versus Comey](http://time.com/4807777/donald-trump-speech-james-comey-testimony-overlap/) show is admittedly high, it’s dwarfed by what’s at stake. And many of the most important questions may go unanswered — or even unasked. The testimony will probably reveal little about the investigation into whether [Russia colluded](http://time.com/4808105/lindsey-graham-trump-russia/) with the President’s campaign. Comey [pre-cleared his testimony](http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/comey-testify-public-next-week-n766741) with Special Counsel (and former FBI director) [Robert Mueller](http://time.com/4783549/robert-mueller-fbi-special-counsel-donald-trump-russia/). As part of that process, Comey undoubtedly agreed to steer clear of substantive questions about Russian interference with the election or collusion with campaign officials. He will have nothing to say, for instance, about the recently leaked [NSA memo](https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/) finding that Russia tried to breach our voting systems, other than perhaps to condemn the leak. On Trump’s efforts to shut down the investigation, Comey could have a longer leash. Although this issue, too, [might be a focus](http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/does%5Fscope%5Fof%5Frobert%5Fmuellers%5Finvestigation%5Finto%5Frussian%5Finfluence%5Finclude) of Mueller’s inquiry, the circumstances are different: Comey’s role here is that of witness, not former head of the investigation. He would only be testifying about what he personally saw and heard, much of which is already the subject of public reports. That means he may have more leeway to answer questions, and we could potentially get some important new information. Trump’s allies on the committee, however, will likely do their best to deflect attention to the leaks that brought the evidence of obstruction to light. This has been the distraction of choice in [previous committee hearings](https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/08/us/politics/sally-yates-james-clapper-russia-hearing.html) on the Russia investigation — and Comey can be relied on to denounce leaking in all its forms. But it’s important to remember: Not all leaks are illegal, let alone dangerous. Information about a president’s attempts to stop the FBI from investigating his aides would not qualify as national-defense information under any law. Revealing such efforts is exposing official misconduct — exactly the kind of whistleblowing our laws and policies are supposed to encourage. With the testimony bouncing back and forth between Trump’s statements to Comey and the leaks that revealed them (with a healthy dose of “I can’t answer that because it’s the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation” sprinkled throughout), some of the most important questions about Trump and Russia will probably not even be asked. These are the questions about the nature and extent of the Trump Administration’s ties to Russian interests, quite apart from any evidence of collusion around the 2016 election. Of course, there’s nothing inherently wrong with an administration official having relationships with citizens of any other country, including Russia. The problem arises when a critical mass of high-level officials have financial or political ties to a hostile foreign government or those working on that government’s behalf. In such a case, it is entirely legitimate to question whether the Administration as a whole can be trusted to act in America’s best interests. The public needs an answer to this question, and only Congress can provide it. Mueller will limit his inquiry to those Trump-Russia ties that may have violated the law. He won’t be trying to discover, say, how much money particular Administration officials owe Russian banks as a result of lawful financial transactions. That kind of information isn’t relevant to his mandate. But it could cast new light on Trump’s lack of concern about Russian hacking, his disclosure of sensitive intelligence to Russian officials, his disparaging of NATO and any number of other actions that seem so plainly inconsistent with our nation’s interests. Is Congress taking the big-picture approach? It’s difficult to know, as much of the relevant committees’ work is still happening behind closed doors. And tomorrow’s hearing probably won’t provide many clues, since Comey wouldn’t be the right person to ask about conflicts of interest that fall short of criminal activity. It may still be a blockbuster event: obstruction of justice is no small matter, and Comey is no small witness. Nonetheless, as we sit on the edge of our seats with our popcorn bowls, we’d do well to remember that there are issues at stake in the Russia-Trump investigation that are far less salacious, but every bit as serious. ## Transcript The President's power to exert executive privilege is very well established. However, in order to facilitate a swift and thorough examination of the facts sought by the Senate's Intelligence Committee, President Trump will not exert executive privilege regarding James Comey's scheduled testimony. [ BLANK_AUDIO ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/"},"headline":"Why James Comey’s Testimony Won’t Give All the Answers We Need","datePublished":"2017-06-07T15:09:40.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:49:10.125Z","description":"There are important questions about Russia and the President that Congress will not ask","url":"https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/","keywords":["politics","James Comey","onetime"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecbebfb66a7d8cd2/6988ccdf7cdbacc2d6d58501/gettyimages-681336342.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Elizabeth Goitein","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/elizabeth-goitein/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecbebfb66a7d8cd2/6988ccdf7cdbacc2d6d58501/gettyimages-681336342.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"FBI Director James Comey - Washington, DC","caption":"FBI Director James Comey - Washington, DC","creditText":"Matt McClain—The Washington Post/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/","name":"Why James Comey’s Testimony Won’t Give All the Answers We Need"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"White House Will Not Invoke Executive Privilege in Comey Testimony","description":"President Trump will not invoke executive privilege to block the testimony of ousted FBI Director James Comey, the White House said Monday.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/t5kOqQ1L/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2017-06-05T18:49:05.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/t5kOqQ1L.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/","duration":"PT17S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4808317/james-comey-fired-president-donald-trump-testimony-russia-senate/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```