--- title: Trump's Syria Airstrikes Are Not Compassionate or Strategic description: 'By cheerleading Trump’s impulsivity on Syria airstrikes, pundits provided the president with the incentive to continue to shoot first' canonical: https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/ author: Elise Jordan article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-04-10T11:19:48.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:04:15.426Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Syria Airstrikes Don't Make Trump Compassionate or Strategic og:description: When people cheer Trump's impulsivity, he has incentive to keep shooting first og:url: https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Syria Airstrikes Don't Make Trump Compassionate or Strategic twitter:description: When people cheer Trump's impulsivity, he has incentive to keep shooting first twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Airstrikes Don't Mean Trump Is Suddenly Compassionate or Strategic > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8d0121f1-a96e-4687-ae5e-9c98445ba221&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8d0121f1-a96e-4687-ae5e-9c98445ba221&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=8d0121f1-a96e-4687-ae5e-9c98445ba221&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: What to Know About the U.S. Missile Attack on Syria [Watch (HLS stream): What to Know About the U.S. Missile Attack on Syria](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Ag8KRTse.m3u8) (1:18)  _Published 2017-04-07. The U.S. fired dozens of cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase Thursday, the first direct assault by American forces against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad._  by [Elise Jordan](https://time.com/author/elise-jordan/)  ## Elise Jordan Apr 10, 2017 11:19 AM UTC  by [Elise Jordan](https://time.com/author/elise-jordan/)  ## Elise Jordan Apr 10, 2017 11:19 AM UTC It might be naive to feel surprised by the bipartisan cheering of President Donald Trump’s quick decision to lob 59 Tomahawk missiles into [Syria](http://time.com/4732401/hr-mcmaster-donald-trump-syria/). But why is it strange to expect the Commander in Chief to invest a shred of thought and planning into the decision to launch a bunch of bombs? Would [Congressional approval](http://time.com/4732133/obama-trump-syria-airstrikes/) have been too much to ask? Syrian dictator [Bashar al-Assad](http://time.com/4730822/syria-airstrike-assad-retaliation/)’s use of chemical weapons should provoke strong emotions — which is exactly why military action by the most capricious American president in history should be debated and approved by Congress. Otherwise, expect Trump’s à la carte foreign policy to yield à la carte stability. Our president loves a [tweet-able victory](http://time.com/4722623/president-trump-tweets-himself-into-a-corner/). Trump’s first war follows the pattern of crony-capitalistic micro-management of American industry, just like those 730 jobs at a [Carrier](http://time.com/4630428/donald-trump-carrier-deal-economic-growth/) furnace factory in Indiana he proudly trumpeted that he saved. Though good for 730 people and their families in the near term, Trump’s solution in Indiana is just a band-aid for a problem that needs a tourniquet. Artificial intelligence threatens to eliminate millions of jobs over the next two decades. Now, Trump’s action in Syria is the foreign-policy equivalent of his Look-at-all-the-jobs-I-saved! tweets: a superficial victory that’s tactically meaningless. Eisenhower famously said that plans are nothing but planning is everything. Though policymakers deserve flexibility when implementing a strategy, Trump has neither plan nor strategy in Syria; he chose from the military’s prix-fixe selection because his mood changed after he saw horrific images of gassed children on television. “[My attitude toward Syria and Assad has changed very much](http://nation.foxnews.com/2017/04/05/my-attitude-toward-syria-and-assad-has-changed-very-much-trump-signals-change-syria),” Trump said, revealing his evident ignorance of [years of slaughter and ongoing toxic attacks](http://sn4hr.org) in the ongoing conflict that has killed tens of thousands of children.“[That crosses many, many lines, beyond a red line, many, many lines](http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/trump-chemical-attacks-in-syria-crossed-many-many-lines-236920).” Because of his undisciplined rhetoric, Trump committed himself to multi-million dollar action to avoid his predecessor’s notoriously hollow “red line” threat. Despite UN Ambassador Nikki Haley’s bluster that this is not a “soft power” administration, Trump chose cruise missiles, a primarily soft-target weapon. Cruise missiles simply won’t cut it if the goal is to cause lasting destruction: a real campaign requires penetrating missiles to take out command and control centers, radar sites and all logistics. Clearly sensitive about his impotent strikes, Trump tweeted on Saturday that the strikes weren’t supposed to take out the runways. So what was the point, exactly? For all of Trump’s posturing about his belief in the element of surprise, the timeline dispels any notion of imminent threat requiring hasty action: to prevent a bigger conflict, the Russians were forewarned, which means they in turned forewarned the Syrian allies with whom they share the air base. Tactically meaningless and strategically flailing. And yet pundits on both sides praised Trump. When pundits and the bipartisan political class praise an isolated strike with no clear tactical or strategic value, they become part of the problem. Never mind that Trump was holding hands with the Egyptian dictator two days prior; a casual bombing campaign meant that Trump suddenly has a heart. Never mind that [Trump showed concern for his friend Bill O’Reilly](http://thehill.com/homenews/media/327423-trump-oreilly-a-good-person-who-shouldnt-have-settled-sexual-harassment-claims) having to pony up millions after multiple women accused O’Reilly of sexual harassment; launching missiles makes Trump a serious person. We live in a rare, scary time when television commentators occupy a unique vantage point of influence over a President whose hunger for praise is matched only by his superhuman appetite for cable news. Trump specifically queried Sean Spicer about the reception of the airstrikes from Congress and foreign leaders, Spicer noted in a timeline provided to reporters, adding, “There was fairly unanimous praise for the decision and the action the president took.” By cheerleading Trump’s impulsivity, pundits provided the president with the incentive to continue to shoot first and not even bother to ask questions later. Without a grand strategy, Trump confuses our allies and adversaries alike and makes it virtually impossible to harness the vast power of America’s diplomatic, military and economic might. If everyone’s confused amidst the constant chaos, that’s weakness, not greatness. There may be a moral case for intervention in Syria, but until a few days ago Trump had spent years arguing against it. Unless he can explain why his about-face serves the interests of the American public he — and we — should stay out. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/"},"headline":"Airstrikes Don't Mean Trump Is Suddenly Compassionate or Strategic","datePublished":"2017-04-10T11:19:48.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:04:15.426Z","description":"'By cheerleading Trump’s impulsivity, pundits provided the president with the incentive to continue to shoot first'","url":"https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/","keywords":["Foreign Policy","Syria","trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Elise Jordan","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/elise-jordan/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/","name":"Airstrikes Don't Mean Trump Is Suddenly Compassionate or Strategic"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"What to Know About the U.S. Missile Attack on Syria","description":"The U.S. fired dozens of cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase Thursday, the first direct assault by American forces against the government of Syrian President Bashar Assad.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Ag8KRTse/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2017-04-07T13:56:29.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Ag8KRTse.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/","duration":"PT1M18S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4732428/trump-syria-no-strategy/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```