--- title: Nuclear Option: Orrin Hatch On Gorsuch and Senate Vote description: Senator Orrin Hatch writes about the nuclear option utilized by Senate Republicans to confirm Neil Gorsuch canonical: https://time.com/4730017/hatch-filibuster-nuclear-option/ author: Sen. Orrin G. Hatch article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-04-06T22:06:26.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T04:16:43.741Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Sen. Orrin Hatch: Democrats Have Themselves to Blame for Rules Change og:description: 'We are here because of what Democrats have done over the last thirty years' og:url: https://time.com/4730017/hatch-filibuster-nuclear-option/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d190fbadeb145ff/6988c1cc4e9ee725e7a0a637/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-filibuster-nuclear-option-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5088 og:image:height: 2862 og:image:alt: Senate Holds Confirmation Hearing For Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Sen. Orrin Hatch: Democrats Have Themselves to Blame for Rules Change twitter:description: 'We are here because of what Democrats have done over the last thirty years' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d190fbadeb145ff/6988c1cc4e9ee725e7a0a637/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-filibuster-nuclear-option-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Sen. Orrin Hatch: Democrats Have Only Themselves to Blame for Rules Change > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8648b6b2-d689-4ee4-9b66-757f15e726d4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8648b6b2-d689-4ee4-9b66-757f15e726d4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=8648b6b2-d689-4ee4-9b66-757f15e726d4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Sen. Orrin G. Hatch](https://time.com/author/sen-orrin-g-hatch/) ## Sen. Orrin G. Hatch Apr 6, 2017 10:06 PM UTC  Judge Neil Gorsuch is sworn in on the first day of his Supreme Court confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill March 20, 2017 in Washington, D.C. Judge Neil Gorsuch is sworn in on the first day of his Supreme Court confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill March 20, 2017 in Washington, D.C.Justin Sullivan—Getty Images by [Sen. Orrin G. Hatch](https://time.com/author/sen-orrin-g-hatch/) ## Sen. Orrin G. Hatch Apr 6, 2017 10:06 PM UTC I’m not happy Senate [Republicans](http://time.com/4723610/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nuclear-option-filibuster/) had to eliminate the [filibuster](http://time.com/4659403/neil-gorsuch-filibuster-abe-fortas/) for [Supreme Court](http://time.com/4728265/senate-supreme-court-neil-gorsuch-nuclear-option/) nominees. I’m an institutionalist. I love the Senate and what it represents. I value debate and honor bipartisanship. But let me be clear: We are here because of what Democrats have done over the last thirty years to poison the confirmation process. I speak from experience, as I’ve been here through all of it. I was here when Democrats started the confirmation wars with their treatment of Robert Bork. Just one year earlier, Senator Ted Kennedy had attempted to filibuster Justice William Rehnquist’s elevation to Chief Justice, but those efforts were thwarted by a bipartisan cloture vote and a subsequent 65-33 confirmation vote. But in 1987, Senate Democrats twisted Judge Bork’s words, misrepresented his record and did their best to turn a good and decent man into some sort of monster. Next came Clarence Thomas. Democrats learned from their Bork experience that fabrications and misrepresentations can bring down even the most qualified nominee. So they set to work on Thomas. Not satisfied with denigrating his professional qualifications, they set about to destroy him personally. To his great credit, Thomas endured and was confirmed by a slim 52-48 margin. When Bill Clinton became President, Senate Republicans did not retaliate. Instead, we gave Judges Ginsburg and Breyer fair hearings and confirmed them overwhelmingly. Indeed, as Ranking Member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, I helped shepherd through both of President Clinton’s nominees. And how did Senate Democrats respond to our fair treatment of President Clinton’s nominees? They filibustered President George W. Bush’s. For the first time in history, Senate Democrats successfully filibustered ten court of appeals nominees. These were nominees who would have been confirmed had they gotten an up-or-down vote. What Senate Democrats did during George W. Bush’s presidency changed the Senate — forever. Next up was Samuel Alito. Like Rehnquist, Alito faced a partisan filibuster by Senate Democrats. And like Rehnquist, he overcame that filibuster. (The only other filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee in our nation’s history was that of Abe Fortas, who faced a bipartisan filibuster due to his questionable ethics background when he was nominated to ascend from Associate Justice to Chief Justice.) Alito received fewer than 60 votes for confirmation, but he overcame the filibuster because 19 Senate Democrats voted to end debate on his nomination, even though only four ultimately voted for confirmation. What happened when Barack Obama became president? Once again, after Senate Democrats had escalated the confirmation wars, Senate Republicans chose not to reciprocate. To be sure, many Republicans voted against Judges Sotomayor and Kagan, but no Republican attempted to filibuster their nominations. And how did Democrats respond to our restraint? They eliminated the filibuster for lower-court nominees. The irony of this particular move is rich. It was the Democrats who, ten years earlier, for the first time in Senate history, began filibustering court of appeals judges in an effort to stop Bush’s nominees. When Senate Republicans did not roll over for Obama’s lower-court nominees, Democrats simply changed the rules back to what they were in practice ten years prior. Democrats, that is, raised the effectual confirmation threshold to 60 votes by instigating filibusters to block Republican nominees, and then lowered it back down to 50 votes to push through Democratic nominees. And they did so after only seven failed cloture votes. Republicans, by contrast, endured twenty failed cloture votes during President Bush’s term, and never changed the rules. That brings us to Judge Gorsuch. Having borked Bork, smeared Thomas, instigated the filibuster for lower court nominees when it was in their interest, filibustered Alito and then eliminated the filibuster for lower-court nominees when it was in their interest, Senate Democrats boldly argued this week that Republicans should throw up our hands and allow them to block Gorsuch — an unquestionably qualified nominee with broad support from across the legal community. History leaves no doubt that, if the shoe were on the other foot, Senate Democrats would never have allowed a partisan filibuster of a Democratic president’s Supreme Court nominee. I have participated in this process for 40 years, during every combination of partisan control in both the Senate and White House. I have seen the confirmation process degrade from cooperation to, now, all-out partisan conflict. That is not a direction that is good for the country or for the institutions of the Senate and the judiciary. I am relieved that we stopped Senate Democrats from continuing to poison the confirmation process and that Judge Gorsuch will get an up-or-down vote. It is unfortunate that the Senate rules had to be changed to ensure that. But that was the choice my Democratic colleagues made by attempting the first successful partisan filibuster of a Supreme Court nominee in American history. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4730017/hatch-filibuster-nuclear-option/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4730017/hatch-filibuster-nuclear-option/"},"headline":"Sen. Orrin Hatch: Democrats Have Only Themselves to Blame for Rules Change","datePublished":"2017-04-06T22:06:26.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T04:16:43.741Z","description":"'We are here because of what Democrats have done over the last thirty years to poison the confirmation process'","url":"https://time.com/4730017/hatch-filibuster-nuclear-option/","keywords":["Congress","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d190fbadeb145ff/6988c1cc4e9ee725e7a0a637/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-filibuster-nuclear-option-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Sen. Orrin G. Hatch","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/sen-orrin-g-hatch/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9d190fbadeb145ff/6988c1cc4e9ee725e7a0a637/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-filibuster-nuclear-option-congress.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Senate Holds Confirmation Hearing For Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch","caption":"Senate Holds Confirmation Hearing For Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch","creditText":"Justin Sullivan—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4730017/hatch-filibuster-nuclear-option/","name":"Sen. Orrin Hatch: Democrats Have Only Themselves to Blame for Rules Change"}}]}] ```