--- title: Health Care Reform for Democrats and Republicans description: The true lesson of this failure is policy matters. A majority of lawmakers should be able to agree on the need to ensure basic coverage. canonical: https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/ author: Farzad Mostashari article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-03-29T15:49:11.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:54:29.316Z article:section: Ideas og:title: This Is How Bipartisan Health Care Reform Can Actually Happen og:description: A majority of lawmakers should be able to agree on the need to ensure basic coverage og:url: https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbfe0201c3add42/6988bfebfb4eac50f1891414/paul-ryan4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: House GOP Pulls Vote On Trump's American Health Care Act og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: This Is How Bipartisan Health Care Reform Can Actually Happen twitter:description: A majority of lawmakers should be able to agree on the need to ensure basic coverage twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbfe0201c3add42/6988bfebfb4eac50f1891414/paul-ryan4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # This Is How Bipartisan Health Care Reform Could Actually Happen > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=c49fb0b7-a3f5-4f89-a76d-f2199ec823a2&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=c49fb0b7-a3f5-4f89-a76d-f2199ec823a2&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=c49fb0b7-a3f5-4f89-a76d-f2199ec823a2&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=c49fb0b7-a3f5-4f89-a76d-f2199ec823a2&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) ## Video: President Trump: It's the Democrats' Fault the Health Care Bill Failed [Watch (HLS stream): President Trump: It's the Democrats' Fault the Health Care Bill Failed](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/ySPMTcST.m3u8) (1:44)  _Published 2017-03-24. President Donald Trump blamed Democrats on Friday for the failure of the GOP health care bill that would have replaced the Affordable Care Act._ by [Farzad Mostashari](https://time.com/author/farzad-mostashari/) ## Farzad Mostashari Mar 29, 2017 3:49 PM UTC  Paul Ryan answers questions at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol after President Trump's healthcare bill was pulled from the floor of the House of Representatives, on March 24, 2017 in Washington, DC. Paul Ryan answers questions at a press conference at the U.S. Capitol after President Trump's healthcare bill was pulled from the floor of the House of Representatives, on March 24, 2017 in Washington, DC. Win McNamee—Getty Images by [Farzad Mostashari](https://time.com/author/farzad-mostashari/) ## Farzad Mostashari Mar 29, 2017 3:49 PM UTC One of the most consequential health care bills in decades was to be voted on in the House. It would affect nearly every American. It was supported by [Paul Ryan](http://time.com/4713114/paul-ryan-ahca-health-care-failure-transcript/) and the relevant Committee chairs and opposed by House Freedom Caucus partisans — Reps. [Mark Meadows](http://time.com/4714131/donald-trump-republican-gop-freedom-caucus-health-care-ahca/), Jim Jordan, Justin Amash and [Dave Brat](http://time.com/2854650/who-is-dave-brat-eric-cantor/), cheered on by Senate hardliners. But in this instance, the [Freedom Caucus](http://time.com/4712155/president-trump-freedom-caucus-healthcare/) opposition would be of little consequence. The bill passed the House by an overwhelming bipartisan vote of 392-37\. It sailed through the Senate two weeks later with 92 Senators voting in favor, and was signed into law by the President. This is not science fiction; the bill, called the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), passed two years ago. It was cosponsored by Democratic stalwarts, and had been carefully put together by senior staffers working together over the prior year. In the aftermath of the disastrous [American Health Care Act](http://time.com/4715803/mark-sanford-republican-healthcare/) of 2017, is there still room for bipartisan cooperation on healthcare? Despite all the breathless blow-by-blow accounts of arm-twisting and vote-getting, the true lesson of this failure is that policy matters, perhaps even more than politics. The bill was rushed and poorly drafted. It achieved no pressing national purpose other than large tax cuts for the wealthy — at the expense of older, sicker, and low-income Americans. The prospects of bipartisan cooperation on healthcare seem dim today. But under the right set of circumstances, we might again see an opening for carefully crafted policy that addresses the real and serious healthcare challenges facing Americans. First, a majority of lawmakers should be able to agree on the need to ensure basic health coverage for all Americans, a goal that President Trump repeated countless times on the campaign trail. Republican Senators Bill Cassidy and Susan Collins have suggested an intriguing alternative to the unpopular individual mandate: individuals who are eligible for subsidized coverage but fail to sign up would be automatically enrolled in a plan by default. This and some well-understood technical tweaks could restore the health of the individual insurance marketplaces. States would be allowed to set up their own approaches as long as they promised similar results at the same cost. The most cost-effective way for states to cover the uninsured is through Medicaid, and expanding the program might even reduce premiums for people on private health insurance. As Kansas and North Carolina have shown, there are plenty of ways to encourage Medicaid expansion in states that have not yet accepted it. Second, in addition to moving the insurance dollars around more effectively, we must also seriously address the root cause of high premiums and deductibles — the high cost of health care. Legislators can build on the MACRA consensus and move towards smarter payments — based on better patient outcomes and efficiency. Policymakers can encourage private payers and State Medicaid agencies to adopt the types of innovative reforms spearheaded by Medicare. They can reduce regulatory constraints on hospitals and physicians that enter these “value-based” arrangements and expand the role of patients. They can bring competitive bidding to high-priced pharmaceuticals and ensure that the prices we pay for new drugs are based on the value that they deliver. Finally, we need to bring real competition into healthcare. There is broad agreement that healthcare markets are not functioning very well to improve quality and reduce costs, mostly due to excessive consolidation and local monopoly powers. A competition policy for healthcare would curb the payment policies and regulations that are driving independent physician practices into employment. It would limit the ability of dominant health systems to demand extortionist prices from health plans and patients regardless of quality. And it would ease the path for new entrants like telehealth providers or innovative health plans. Each of these provisions will have stakeholders who benefit and those who don’t. But everyone will have something to gain by engaging in the process. Legislators and their staff could skillfully blend in provisions to bring in additional votes — like tort reform or repealing certain healthcare taxes. They could ensure that the expenditures in the bill are balanced by savings elsewhere (like not over-paying for hospital outpatient procedures). Putting a cap on tax write-offs for very expensive health policies will garner the support of nearly all health economists. Taken together, these measures would decrease the number of uninsured Americans. They would make healthcare more affordable. They would finally let private market competition work to improve the quality and cost of our healthcare system. That would be something truly terrific. _Mostashari is the Founder and CEO of Aledade, Inc. and former National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at the US Department of Health and Human Services._ ## Transcript Pass the bill in the house without any democratic support. Why do you think you are enable to craft to deal among the republican part? Well, we were very close. We were just probably anywhere from 10 to 15 votes short. Could've of even been closer than that, you'll never know because you never know how they vote. But in the end, I think we would've been ten votes, maybe closer. And it's very hard to get almost 100 %. You're talking about a very, very large number of votes among any group. We were very close to doing it. But when you get no votes from the other side, meaning the Democrats, it's really a difficult situation. Will you reach out to Democrats now? No I think we have to let Obamacare go it's way for a little while, and we'll see how things go. I'd love to see it do well, but it can't, I mean it can't. It's not a question of gee I hope it does well, I would love it to do well. I want great healthcare for people of this nation, but it can't do well. It's imploding, and soon will explode. And it's not gonna be pretty. So the Democrats don't want to see that. So they're gonna reach out when they're ready. And whenever they're ready, we're ready. And I never said, I guess I'm here, what, 64 days, I never said repeal and replace Obamacare. You've all heard my speeches. I never said repeal it and replace it within 64 days. I have a long time But I wanna have a great healthcare bill and plan and we will. It will happen . And it won't be in the very distant future. I really believe that with some Democrat support, that will happen and it will be an even better bill. I think this was a very good bill. I think it will be even better The next time around. And I don't think that's gonna be in too long a period of time. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/"},"headline":"This Is How Bipartisan Health Care Reform Could Actually Happen","datePublished":"2017-03-29T15:49:11.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:54:29.316Z","description":"A majority of lawmakers should be able to agree on the need to ensure basic coverage.","url":"https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/","keywords":["Healthcare"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbfe0201c3add42/6988bfebfb4eac50f1891414/paul-ryan4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Farzad Mostashari","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/farzad-mostashari/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbfe0201c3add42/6988bfebfb4eac50f1891414/paul-ryan4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"House GOP Pulls Vote On Trump's American Health Care Act","caption":"House GOP Pulls Vote On Trump's American Health Care Act","creditText":"Win McNamee—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/","name":"This Is How Bipartisan Health Care Reform Could Actually Happen"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"President Trump: It's the Democrats' Fault the Health Care Bill Failed","description":"President Donald Trump blamed Democrats on Friday for the failure of the GOP health care bill that would have replaced the Affordable Care Act.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/ySPMTcST/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2017-03-24T21:27:07.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/ySPMTcST.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/","duration":"PT1M44S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4716513/health-care-reform/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```