--- title: Why the Federal Reserve Is Bad for America description: Donald Trump has a golden opportunity to create positive change at the Federal Reserve, says analyst and author Danielle DiMartino Booth canonical: https://time.com/4709783/federal-reserve-bad-for-america/ author: Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-04-18T16:07:57.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T03:58:50.142Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Why the Federal Reserve Is Bad for America og:description: The Fed still has on its 'beer goggles' og:url: https://time.com/4709783/federal-reserve-bad-for-america/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why the Federal Reserve Is Bad for America twitter:description: The Fed still has on its 'beer goggles' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # The Fed Still Has On Its Beer Goggles > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=34eb1e6f-510a-4cce-9ba0-c48483ad3cb0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=34eb1e6f-510a-4cce-9ba0-c48483ad3cb0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=34eb1e6f-510a-4cce-9ba0-c48483ad3cb0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth](https://time.com/author/danielle-dimartino-booth/) ## Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth Apr 18, 2017 4:07 PM UTC by [Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth](https://time.com/author/danielle-dimartino-booth/) ## Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth Apr 18, 2017 4:07 PM UTC Coulda, shoulda, woulda. How different would the world we live in today be had the Federal Reserve shown restraint and practiced self-control in the current economic recovery? Where would the stock market be if Fed officials had not placated investors every time they threw a temper tantrum, demanding more stimulus? We will, of course, never know the answers to these questions. But we can hope that the next generation of Fed leaders does have the wisdom and courage to push back against the market’s demands in favor of fostering long-term stability and economic growth. Soon after ringing in 2014, a hilarious column by one of my closest friends, market analyst Peter Boockvar of the Lindsey Group, made me laugh out loud. I forwarded “[Beer Goggles](http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/01/take-off-the-beer-goggles-stocks-are-dangerous-analyst-peter-boockvar.html)” to Dallas Federal Reserve president Richard Fisher, who loved it when I shot great metaphors his way. Not long afterwards, [Fisher quoted Boockvar](http://www.lowestrates.com/blogs/dallas-fed-president-richard-fisher-concerned-beer-goggle-economy#), giving what would become his most famous speech: “QE puts beer goggles on investors by creating a line of sight where everything looks good.” For his “wine and martini” audience, the National Association of Corporate Directors, Fisher defined the term “[beer goggles](http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=beer%20goggles),” described in the Urban Dictionary as the effect that alcohol has in rendering a person alluring who one would ordinarily regard as unattractive. “Things often look better when one is under the influence of free-flowing liquidity,” Fisher said. “This is one reason why William McChesney Martin, the longest-serving Fed chairman in our institution’s 100-year history, famously said that the Fed’s job is to take away the punch bowl just as the party gets going.” Where are we now? Punch bowl, beer goggles. Different eras, same hangover. Commercial real estate and bonds are more overvalued than at any time in history and stocks are trading at their priciest level save one period, the late 1990s before the dotcom implosion. The beer goggles, it would seem, have blinded investors to the bubble wrap that’s enveloped their portfolios. There are a few brave souls at the Fed who have raised a red flag. On March 22nd, [Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren warned](http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/22/hot-us-real-estate-a-potential-red-flag-feds-rosengren.html), “…we must acknowledge that the commercial real estate sector has the potential to amplify whatever problems may emerge when we at some point face an economic downturn.” Wiser words, especially given so few who recall that it was not the decline in oil prices that made the late 1980s such a painful period for the economy, but rather the crash in commercial real estate the energy crunch catalyzed. Underlying the multiple overheating markets is a persistent underappreciation of financial instability among Fed policymakers. The institution, overladen as it is with PhD economists, has yet to revisit the models that drive its setting of interest rate policy. Had the Fed’s inflation metrics taken into account runaway stock prices in the late 1990s and skyrocketing home prices in the early 2000s, it’s likely they would have intervened to tighten financial conditions much sooner than they did. Revisiting the [wisdom of former Fed chair McChesney Martin](http://instituteforfinancialtransparency.com/2017/02/17/fed-up-a-brief-book-review/) is useful: --- > “” --- You always want these technical experts on tap in positions like this, but never on top. The hope is that President Donald Trump heeds McChesney Martin’s 1970s-era wisdom, that he respects the wishes of those who originally envisioned the Fed as an appreciably more intellectually diverse entity. After all, the original 1913 Federal Reserve Act requires the president to appoint leaders across a diversity of industries. That is certainly not the case today. Of the 17 leaders on the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets interest rates, 10 are PhD economists and two are lawyers. Few would dispute this makeup is the antithesis of “diversity.” President Trump has few opportunities to make his mark, unheeded by others’ influence. The choice of the Fed’s future leaders is a rare and exceptional place for him to leave his mark to the benefit of generations of Americans to come. _Adapted from_ [FED UP: An Insider’s Take on Why the Federal Reserve is Bad for America](https://www.amazon.com/Fed-Up-Insiders-Federal-Reserve/dp/0735211655/ref=s9%5Fsimh%5Fgw%5Fg14%5Fi1%5Fr?%5Fencoding=UTF8&fpl=fresh&pf%5Frd%5Fm=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf%5Frd%5Fs=&pf%5Frd%5Fr=29437K9N0FY790M3KT41&pf%5Frd%5Ft=36701&pf%5Frd%5Fp=9f840529-d6e7-463b-ab2b-3aa605b03263&pf%5Frd%5Fi=desktop) _by Danielle DiMartino Booth, with permission from Portfolio, an imprint of Penguin Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House LLC. Copyright © Money Strong LLC, 2017._ _DiMartino Booth spent nine years as analyst with the Federal Reserve of Dallas. She is the founder of Money Strong._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4709783/federal-reserve-bad-for-america/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4709783/federal-reserve-bad-for-america/"},"headline":"The Fed Still Has On Its Beer Goggles","datePublished":"2017-04-18T16:07:57.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T03:58:50.142Z","description":"Donald Trump has a golden opportunity to create positive change at the Federal Reserve, says analyst and author Danielle DiMartino Booth","url":"https://time.com/4709783/federal-reserve-bad-for-america/","keywords":["finance"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Danielle Danielle DiMartino Booth","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/danielle-dimartino-booth/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4709783/federal-reserve-bad-for-america/","name":"The Fed Still Has On Its Beer Goggles"}}]}] ```