--- title: How Abortion Rocked the Women's March, the March for Life description: The debate over a woman's right to choose has changed progressive politics canonical: https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/ author: Mary Eberstadt article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-01-26T10:58:07.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:54:41.689Z article:section: Ideas og:title: How the Abortion Debate Rocked Progressivism og:description: Absolutism on the issue could make or break the Democratic Party og:url: https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt710c5f8bd9208c1a/6988b759428a9efce5cd5a06/donald-trump-womens-march-abortion-life-pro-roe-wade.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5000 og:image:height: 2813 og:image:alt: People take part in the Million Woman March one day after og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: How the Abortion Debate Rocked Progressivism twitter:description: Absolutism on the issue could make or break the Democratic Party twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt710c5f8bd9208c1a/6988b759428a9efce5cd5a06/donald-trump-womens-march-abortion-life-pro-roe-wade.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # How the Abortion Debate Rocked Progressivism > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=255952e9-1ccd-4a3f-8683-848080fa2657&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=255952e9-1ccd-4a3f-8683-848080fa2657&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=255952e9-1ccd-4a3f-8683-848080fa2657&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Photos From Women’s Marches Around the World [Watch (HLS stream): Photos From Women’s Marches Around the World](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/MR43xeJq.m3u8) (1:44)  _Published 2017-01-23. A glimpse at the Women's March in over 50 cities throughout the world._ by [Mary Eberstadt](https://time.com/author/mary-eberstadt/) ## Mary Eberstadt Jan 26, 2017 10:58 AM UTC  People take part in the Million Woman March one day after the inauguration of Donald Trump in Washington, D.C. People take part in the Million Woman March one day after the inauguration of Donald Trump in Washington, D.C. Stephen J. Boitano—LightRocket/Getty Images by [Mary Eberstadt](https://time.com/author/mary-eberstadt/) ## Mary Eberstadt Jan 26, 2017 10:58 AM UTC Put aside for a moment the [Inauguration](http://time.com/4649681/donald-trump-interview-crowd-size-voter-fraud-torture/?xid=homepage) of [President Donald Trump](http://time.com/4649945/congress-republicans-policy-retreat-donald-trump/?xid=homepage). Together, the [Women’s March](http://time.com/4649891/protest-donald-trump/) on Jan. 21 and the [March for Life](http://motto.time.com/4632907/kellyanne-conway-anti-abortion-march-for-life/) on Jan. 27 highlight a reality that isn’t going away: forty-four years after [_Roe v. Wade_](http://time.com/4643494/donald-trump-roe-wade/), the politics of [abortion](http://time.com/4574496/donald-trump-abortion/) in America is more polarized and divisive than ever. Why? Consider the about-face by the [Women’s March](http://time.com/4642376/women-march-trump-inauguration-washington-antarctica/). No event in our time has been heralded as more diverse and inclusive of women everywhere — until an antiabortion group called [New Wave Feminists](http://www.newwavefeminists.com/) took the marchers at their word and tried to join ranks. They got the boot. “The Women’s March’s platform is pro-choice, and that has been our stance from day one,” the excluders explained. Which means that now, in 2017, support for abortion has become so central and nonnegotiable to today’s feminism and progressivism that some women’s groups aren’t allowed to officially join a women’s march that’s supposed to be for all women. And that’s just one instance of the extremes now dictated by new absolutism. Consider the legacy of President Barack Obama. For two terms, his Administration gave teeth to the Democratic Party’s support of abortion rights. It made a priority of using existing regulations to penalize demonstrators outside abortion clinics. The contraception mandate arguably covering abortifacient drugs gave rise to hundreds of lawsuits, including by indigent nuns: witness the [Little Sisters of the Poor](http://littlesistersofthepoor.org/), who became part of the Supreme Court case [_Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores_](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354%5Folp1.pdf). Capping off his record, on one of his last days in office, Obama finalized a rule that banned states from withholding Title X federal money from health clinics that provide abortion. Like-minded absolutism has led groups like the ACLU to sue Catholic hospitals and otherwise work against charitable Christian organizations. Emergency pregnancy centers run by antiabortion groups — where women can get free medical advice and other help, as well as more prosaic aid like diapers and baby furniture — have also become targets of progressives. The ACLU has sued the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops over its work on the southern border. The Catholic Church is instrumental in alleviating humanitarian need there, but these days defending abortion trumps helping refugees. This is a sea change for progressivism. Until the 1990s or so, nationally respected Democrats like Sargent Shriver and Robert Casey of Pennsylvania enjoyed good standing in the party without having to recant their pro-life stances. Other progressive leaders, both before and after _Roe_, could also oppose abortion, and did — among them Jesse Jackson (who later switched). Civil libertarian Nat Hentoff, who died in January, argued for a connection between civil liberties and the unborn. Reaching further back, many suffragists and early feminists also believed that abortion does women and children wrong — with Dorothy Day and Charlotte Lozier among them. If these champions for women were alive today, they would have been barred as formal partners in the [Women’s March](http://time.com/4642524/womens-march-on-washington-men-trump-inauguration/) too. Similarly, even yesterday’s champions of abortion rights weren’t nearly as uncompromisingly dogmatic as they’ve become. During the 2008 campaign, the recent Democratic standard bearer, [Hillary Clinton](http://time.com/time-person-of-the-year-2016-hillary-clinton-runner-up/), could call for making abortion “[safe, legal and rare](http://time.com/4364631/hillary-clinton-planned-parenthood-speech-transcript/).” Such careful rhetoric was in keeping with reality. Yet by 2016, with its declaration of newly “unequivocal” support, the Democratic Party platform was agreed by all sides to be the most “progressive” in history — more supportive of abortion rights than ever before. Until just a few years ago, progressives had a choice between their opinions on abortion and their opinions about everything else. Now they don’t. Will this choiceless stance prove acceptable to all people of the left, beyond coastal elites? Will today’s abortion-rights absolutism help the Democratic Party that progressivism calls home — or cleave it? Tomorrow’s elections may hinge in part on answers to just those questions. _Eberstadt is an essayist and the author of several books, including_ [It’s Dangerous to Believe: Religious Freedom and Its Enemies](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0062454013/?tag=timecom-20) _and_ [How the West Really Lost God: A New Theory of Secularization](https://www.amazon.com/dp/1599474662/?tag=timecom-20)_; earlier books include_ [Adam and Eve After the Pill](https://www.amazon.com/dp/1586178229/?tag=timecom-20)_,_ [Home-Alone America](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B000EXYZVS/?tag=timecom-20) _and the satire_ [The Loser Letters](https://www.amazon.com/dp/1586174312/?tag=timecom-20)_._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/"},"headline":"How the Abortion Debate Rocked Progressivism","datePublished":"2017-01-26T10:58:07.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:54:41.689Z","description":"Absolutism on the issue could make or break the Democratic Party","url":"https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/","keywords":["abortion","women's rights","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt710c5f8bd9208c1a/6988b759428a9efce5cd5a06/donald-trump-womens-march-abortion-life-pro-roe-wade.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mary Eberstadt","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mary-eberstadt/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt710c5f8bd9208c1a/6988b759428a9efce5cd5a06/donald-trump-womens-march-abortion-life-pro-roe-wade.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"People take part in the Million Woman March one day after","caption":"People take part in the Million Woman March one day after","creditText":"Stephen J. Boitano—LightRocket/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/","name":"How the Abortion Debate Rocked Progressivism"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Photos From Women’s Marches Around the World","description":"A glimpse at the Women's March in over 50 cities throughout the world.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/MR43xeJq/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2017-01-23T06:09:57.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/MR43xeJq.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/","duration":"PT1M44S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4649910/donald-trump-abortion-progressivism/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```