--- title: White Women Should Check Their Privilege After Women's March description: Find out why one journalist says white women need to check their privilege after the historic Women's March on Washington. canonical: https://time.com/4649065/womens-march-privilege/ author: Lauren Sandler article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-01-25T19:17:58.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T10:39:08.718Z article:section: Ideas og:title: White Women Need to Check Their Privilege After the Women’s March og:description: ‘Let’s fight until everyone’s civil liberties are equally protected’ og:url: https://time.com/4649065/womens-march-privilege/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdfb72c3ae913dd4c/6988b732fb4eac3c7d89087d/womens-march-washington-dc.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4928 og:image:height: 2772 og:image:alt: Women's March on Washington og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: White Women Need to Check Their Privilege After the Women’s March twitter:description: ‘Let’s fight until everyone’s civil liberties are equally protected’ twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdfb72c3ae913dd4c/6988b732fb4eac3c7d89087d/womens-march-washington-dc.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # White Women Need to Check Their Privilege After the Women’s March (25 Jan 2017) > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=9a2a44f8-7816-4dd4-a01a-efaab7367212&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=9a2a44f8-7816-4dd4-a01a-efaab7367212&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=9a2a44f8-7816-4dd4-a01a-efaab7367212&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.  by [Lauren Sandler](https://time.com/author/lauren-sandler/)  ## Lauren Sandler Jan 25, 2017 7:17 PM UTC  Crowds gather for the rally on Independence Ave next to the National Mall at the Women's March on Washington on Jan. 21, 2017 in Washington, DC. Crowds gather for the rally on Independence Ave next to the National Mall at the Women's March on Washington on Jan. 21, 2017 in Washington, DC. Ann Hermes—Christian Science Monitor/Getty Images  by [Lauren Sandler](https://time.com/author/lauren-sandler/)  ## Lauren Sandler Jan 25, 2017 7:17 PM UTC At the [Women’s March on Washington](http://motto.time.com/4644446/womens-march-count-me-text/) this weekend, [not a single protester was arrested](http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/315529-womens-march-on-washington-yields-zero-arrests-report). That’s great news. But is it incontrovertible proof that when women lead, peace follows? Hardly. Instead of simply priding ourselves, ladies, let’s own what really happened: no one saw our majority-white-female bodily presence as a [threat to contain](https://newrepublic.com/article/140065/myth-well-behaved-womens-march). There are many reasons to be proud of how uplifting the march was — the sheer numbers! the optimism of resistance! [the signs](http://nymag.com/thecut/2017/01/funny-protest-signs-womens-march-2017.html)! — but the peacefulness was a testament to how relatively [unpoliced the event](http://www.wmagazine.com/story/womens-march-on-washington-essay) was, which I’m certainly not alone in reading as due to our whiteness. In the ebullient aftermath, we’ve got some unpacking and acknowledging to do. And it’s got everything to do with privilege. Let’s talk cops. Peaceful protests are largely a function of policing — if you approach something like a threat, it’s more likely to become one. The march was treated as something that didn’t need to be policed, and the prophecy self-fulfilled. In fact, there was barely any noticeable police presence at all. Walking from K Street to the rally site, I spotted exactly two crossing guards, about a mile away from Independence Avenue. Once the rally began to wrap up, and marchers flooded the mall and then Pennsylvania Avenue all the way to the White House, I did not see a single uniformed officer. Certainly, there were some cops out there — I saw people posing with them in my Facebook feed. But at the rally, their presence was mainly conjured when the mothers of sons slain by police (or a certain neighborhood watchman) for the color of their skin recited their[ children’s names](http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/7662606/janelle-monae-hell-you-talmbout-womens-march). Eric Garner. Trayvon Martin. Mohamed Bah. Dontre Hamilton. How did it feel for those mothers to travel from their communities to that stage and not see a looming force of men in blue? Not to mention the women of color performing for mainly white women who had the privilege of gathering in historic numbers without being shadowed with [state-sanctioned violence](http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0503-burrough-violent-revolution-20150503-story.html). The leadership of the march reflected its truly [unifying platform](https://www.womensmarch.com/principles). But one has to wonder if there would have been peace in the streets if law enforcement expected marchers to mirror the women who labored to bring us together. We unravel the powerful statements of intersectionality that we heard from that stage when we congratulate ourselves for the safety of the march. That safety is a privilege, among many privileges. We must consider the racial and economic factors behind the fact that there’s a different state system for women with skin privilege — and economic privilege. Failing to do so reinforces the oppression so many of us said we were marching to dismantle. The absence of an intimidating law-enforcement presence at the Washington march, in contrast with the policing of gatherings and communities of color, is part of a story we must tell if we are to speak the truth of this march. Not every woman there was a woman of privilege, whether it be due to the color of their skin or their financial comfort. “I spent a fortune to come here,” one woman told me, who had flown in from Colorado and stayed at the Renaissance hotel where rooms were more than $800 a night. “Didn’t we all?” I’m glad that she came. I’m glad I had the funds to share an AirBnb with my friend who drove us down there ($150 per night for each of us). I’m glad I brought my 8-year-old daughter; I’m glad she brought her son. My mother flew down from Boston on [JetBlue](http://fortune.com/fortune500/jetblue-airways-405/), with a ticket she bought the morning President Trump gave his acceptance speech, and Hillary Clinton gave her concession. I’m glad she had that privilege. On my mother’s plane, flight attendants wore pink cat-ear hats, took pictures with the women who filled every seat to protest and cheered the marchers over the P.A. I’m glad for that too. But would they have taken pictures and cheered if the flight had been filled with people flying down to march against a Muslim registry? Would my mother have traveled as swiftly from the tarmac to the entrance to the metro? Would the flight attendants have donned hats in solidarity with those marchers? There’s a [beautiful picture](http://kuow.org/post/portland-seattle-among-most-well-attended-womens-marches) of a white cop in uniform wearing one of those pink hats, smiling alongside the march route in Portland. It’s hard to imagine him in a Black Lives Matter armband alongside a march for racial justice or wearing a button in support of immigrant rights. Another [photo](http://www.theroot.com/woman-in-viral-photo-from-women-s-march-to-white-female-1791524613) has been circulating of three white women in pink hats smiling into their own phones near a black woman holding a sign reminding us that [many white women](http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/20/14061660/women-march-washington-vote-trump) voted for Trump. The image has been divisive. But that sign does not state an alternative fact — nor should we ignore that [94% of black women voted against Trump](https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/opinion/white-women-voted-trump-now-what.html). These things are simply true. Just as our march was given the benefit of the doubt by law enforcement. (And surely no one in public relations was a fan of the optics of men in uniform roughing up a mass of white ladies.) If we want a true women’s movement, our joyous, contagious celebrations must beware of self-congratulation. There is much to cheer in this historic, women-led moment that united so many of us. But we can’t fail to be clear-eyed about existing injustice as we fight against gender inequality. If we want a true women’s movement, that means not just marching on behalf of our own lady-parts but against injustice for all. It means loudly and affirmatively answering another sign that went viral after the march, the one that says, “I’LL SEE YOU NICE WHITE LADIES AT THE NEXT #BLACKLIVESMATTER MARCH, RIGHT?” I felt optimism and hope and pride in our stunning numbers — in Washington, around the country and around the world. But I have to confess: I don’t think I’ve quite felt the magic like so many millions of other protesters did on Saturday and in the aftermath of our historic march. There is much to cheer, but instead of congratulating ourselves for showing up peacefully when it was our privilege to do so, let’s fight until everyone’s civil liberties are equally protected. Let’s listen to each other as well as chant. It’s not always going to be pretty or selfie-ready in a pink hat. But if we want to build a movement, we must march forward together, even if we blister along the way. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4649065/womens-march-privilege/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4649065/womens-march-privilege/"},"headline":"White Women Need to Check Their Privilege After the Women’s March (25 Jan 2017)","datePublished":"2017-01-25T19:17:58.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T10:39:08.718Z","description":"‘Let’s fight until everyone’s civil liberties are equally protected’","url":"https://time.com/4649065/womens-march-privilege/","keywords":["feminism","women","politics","Race","women's march"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdfb72c3ae913dd4c/6988b732fb4eac3c7d89087d/womens-march-washington-dc.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Lauren Sandler","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/lauren-sandler/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltdfb72c3ae913dd4c/6988b732fb4eac3c7d89087d/womens-march-washington-dc.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Women's March on Washington","caption":"Women's March on Washington","creditText":"Ann Hermes—Christian Science Monitor/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/feminism/","name":"feminism"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4649065/womens-march-privilege/","name":"White Women Need to Check Their Privilege After the Women’s March (25 Jan 2017)"}}]}] ```