--- title: Orrin Hatch: Congress Needs Criminal Intent Reform description: Everyday activity has become criminalized while true justice eludes many real criminals canonical: https://time.com/4645443/orrin-hatch-trump-criminal-justice/ author: Sen. Orrin G. Hatch article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2017-01-25T14:39:12.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T02:55:08.261Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Sen. Orrin Hatch: Some Common Sense on Criminal Intent and Reform og:description: Everyday activity has become criminalized while true justice eludes many real criminals og:url: https://time.com/4645443/orrin-hatch-trump-criminal-justice/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Sen. Orrin Hatch: Some Common Sense on Criminal Intent and Reform twitter:description: Everyday activity has become criminalized while true justice eludes many real criminals twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Sen. Orrin Hatch: Here’s Some Common Sense on Criminal Intent and Reform > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8c7686dd-5f6c-457d-a1d8-dd9d9ad0827a&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8c7686dd-5f6c-457d-a1d8-dd9d9ad0827a&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=8c7686dd-5f6c-457d-a1d8-dd9d9ad0827a&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Sen. Orrin G. Hatch](https://time.com/author/sen-orrin-g-hatch/) ## Sen. Orrin G. Hatch Jan 25, 2017 2:39 PM UTC by [Sen. Orrin G. Hatch](https://time.com/author/sen-orrin-g-hatch/) ## Sen. Orrin G. Hatch Jan 25, 2017 2:39 PM UTC For the past two years, I’ve been championing a reform that would make our [criminal laws](http://time.com/4429332/police-officer-hate-crime/) [fairer](http://time.com/4482150/ban-the-box-unintended-discrimination/) and more just. It has to do with criminal intent requirements, also known as _mens rea_ (Latin for “guilty mind”) requirements. Broadly speaking, in order to convict a person of a [crime](http://time.com/4607059/murder-rate-increase-us-cities-2016/), the government must prove both that the person committed an illegal act and that the person did so with criminal intent. Requiring the government to prove criminal intent—that is, to prove that the defendant acted with a guilty mind—protects individuals from going to jail for accidental conduct or for doing things a reasonable person would not think were wrong. It also helps prevent prosecutors from arbitrarily targeting disfavored groups for technical violations of arcane laws no one knows about. Unfortunately, in recent years these crucial protections have eroded through regulatory encroachment and congressional inattention. The unchecked growth of the administrative state has brought with it hundreds of thousands of regulations with criminal penalties for such run-of-the-mill activities as dog-walking and surfing. Many of these regulations have no criminal-intent requirements, meaning officials can ensnare unsuspecting Americans who had no idea they were doing anything wrong. At the same time, Congress has continued to pass laws criminalizing just about everything in sight. Be careful the next time you draw a picture of [Smokey the Bear](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/711) or put the [4-H logo](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/707) on a poster. If you’re not careful, you could be breaking the law. Many of these laws similarly have no intent requirement—often because Congress simply didn’t bother to put one in. The upshot of all this is that we now have on the books laws criminalizing just about every activity conceivable without adequate protections to ensure that only the truly culpable face criminal prosecution. This is a recipe for prosecutorial overreach and arbitrary enforcement. So for the past two years I’ve been championing an effort to shore up intent requirements throughout our criminal laws. [My proposal](https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/2298/all-info), endorsed by groups as ideologically varied as the [Heritage Foundation](http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2015/09/the-pressing-need-for-mens-rea-reform) and the [National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers](https://www.nacdl.org/mensrea%5Fsenate%5Fintroduced/), is simple. Congress should set a default intent requirement for all criminal laws and regulations that apply unless Congress or the relevant agency has expressly chosen in the text of the statute or regulation to set a lower intent standard. This reform would not prevent lawmakers from creating crimes without any intent requirement—so-called “strict liability” crimes—but it would require them to be clear when they wish to do so. It would ensure that hard-working Americans do not find themselves on the hook for seemingly innocent conduct merely because Congress or an agency failed to have the forethought to put an intent requirement in the text of the law. Regrettably, my efforts to enact this commonsense reform have been stymied by [left-wing groups](http://www.citizen.org/documents/weissman-senate-judiciary-testimony-january-2016.pdf) opposed to any proposal that [they believe](https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/25/us/politics/rare-alliance-of-libertarians-and-white-house-on-sentencing-begins-to-fray.html?%5Fr=1) could make certain white-collar prosecutions more difficult. Never mind that the default would apply to _all_ criminal laws, and thus treat all defendants fairly and equally, in line with our constitutional ideals. Because the default might make some prosecutions of some disfavored individuals more difficult, these groups oppose it. I’ve been heartened in recent days to see several of my colleagues recognize publicly the need to include _mens rea_ reform alongside other efforts to improve our nation’s criminal laws. Last Congress, these colleagues were hesitant to include my proposal with other reforms to sentencing and prison laws out of concern that [left-wing opposition](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/01/20/the-issue-that-could-keep-congress-from-passing-criminal-justice-reform/?utm%5Fterm=.bd8bc1831f17) to my proposal could scuttle the entire project. At the same time, liberal groups apparently made the calculation that rather than work toward common ground on my proposal, they would wait until the next Congress to ram through their preferred package under President Clinton and a new Democratic Senate majority. Boy, were they wrong. In President Trump, they got a law-and-order candidate whose top legal adviser, Alabama Senator and Attorney General-designate Jeff Sessions, is one of the most vociferous opponents of liberal-style criminal justice reform. And Republicans maintained their Senate majority. If there is going to be progress this Congress on criminal justice issues, both sides are going to have to be willing to negotiate. This is true of sentencing and prison reform, and it is true of _mens rea_ reform as well. I’ve maintained all along that we cannot have true criminal justice reform without _mens rea_ reform, because _mens rea_ requirements determine whether a person is guilty of a criminal offense in the first place. Equally important, such requirements are essential to protecting morally innocent individuals from government harassment and arbitrary prosecution. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4645443/orrin-hatch-trump-criminal-justice/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4645443/orrin-hatch-trump-criminal-justice/"},"headline":"Sen. Orrin Hatch: Here’s Some Common Sense on Criminal Intent and Reform","datePublished":"2017-01-25T14:39:12.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T02:55:08.261Z","description":"Everyday activity has become criminalized while true justice eludes many real criminals","url":"https://time.com/4645443/orrin-hatch-trump-criminal-justice/","keywords":["Criminal Justice","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Sen. Orrin G. Hatch","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/sen-orrin-g-hatch/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/criminal-justice/","name":"Criminal Justice"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4645443/orrin-hatch-trump-criminal-justice/","name":"Sen. Orrin Hatch: Here’s Some Common Sense on Criminal Intent and Reform"}}]}] ```