<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/" -->

---
title: The Jury&#x27;s Out on President Obama&#x27;s Terror Fight
description: When it comes to the war on terror, the question that will outlive the Obama presidency is: did he do enough?
canonical: https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/
author: Mark Thompson
article:opinion: false
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2016-12-06T22:46:39.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:54:53.346Z
article:section: Politics
og:title: The Jury&#x27;s Out on Obama&#x27;s Terror Fight
og:description: The question that will outlive his presidency is: did he do enough?
og:url: https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta93f4be10d0ad83c/6988b1f40b72e3efdf6ebf7d/gettyimages-628080856.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 1024
og:image:height: 576
og:image:alt: US-POLITICS-OBAMA
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: The Jury&#x27;s Out on Obama&#x27;s Terror Fight
twitter:description: The question that will outlive his presidency is: did he do enough?
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta93f4be10d0ad83c/6988b1f40b72e3efdf6ebf7d/gettyimages-628080856.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1024&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta93f4be10d0ad83c/6988b1f40b72e3efdf6ebf7d/gettyimages-628080856.jpg?branch=production&width=1024&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# The Jury's Out on Obama's Terror Fight

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="dee27a68-2ab4-4739-8dd6-9807adb0a618" campaign="time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3" creative="time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=dee27a68-2ab4-4739-8dd6-9807adb0a618&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Twice a week | time.com/newsletters, September 2026 |
| Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy.

### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements

*   D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=dee27a68-2ab4-4739-8dd6-9807adb0a618&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=dee27a68-2ab4-4739-8dd6-9807adb0a618&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is TIME's politics newsletter?

D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, twice a week.

#### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email?

D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time.

#### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief?

Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief.

#### Is D.C. Brief free?

Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=dee27a68-2ab4-4739-8dd6-9807adb0a618&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is TIME's politics newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, twice a week.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is D.C. Brief free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/cHKOaLU0.m3u8" -->
## Video: President Obama Delivers Last Major National Security Speech

[Watch (HLS stream): President Obama Delivers Last Major National Security Speech](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/cHKOaLU0.m3u8) (2:22)

![President Obama Delivers Last Major National Security Speech](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/cHKOaLU0/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2016-12-06. President Barack Obama gave his last major national security speech as Commander-in-Chief on Tuesday. He summed up his administration’s counter-terrorism efforts over the past eight years._


by 

[Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/)


## Mark Thompson


Dec 6, 2016 10:46 PM UTC

![US-POLITICS-OBAMA](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta93f4be10d0ad83c/6988b1f40b72e3efdf6ebf7d/gettyimages-628080856.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

President Obama addresses his counter-terror legacy Tuesday at MacDill Air Force Base, Fla.

President Obama addresses his counter-terror legacy Tuesday at MacDill Air Force Base, Fla. Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images

by 

[Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/)


## Mark Thompson


Dec 6, 2016 10:46 PM UTC

If you said on Sept. 12, 2001, that there wouldn’t be another major terror attack on U.S. soil over the next 15 years, most Americans wouldn’t have believed you. Yet, that’s just what has happened. Following the deaths of 2,996 people on 9/11, there has been a flurry of terror attacks—the biggest one killing 49 at an Orlando nightclub in June—but nothing like the horror visited on New York City, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field.

Politicians like to take credit for pretty much anything, so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that President Obama [defended his counter-terrorism record in a speech](http://time.com/4592640/president-obama-national-security-speech-muslims/) Tuesday. It is likely to be the last major speech on national security of his presidency.

“No foreign terrorist organization has planned and executed an attack on our homeland in the last eight years,” he said at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla. “And it is not because they didn’t try.” The base is the central hub of the U.S. war on terror: U.S. Central Command, which is running the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and U.S. Special Operations Command, which killed Osama bin Laden, are both headquartered there. The summing-up speech has been in the works for months, and is unrelated to Donald Trump’s election last month, White House officials said.

But, after 9/11, there also were no major terror attacks inside the U.S. during the remaining seven years of President George W. Bush’s Administration.


Bush launched two wars to defeat terrorism, while Obama pushed to wind them down. Does their mutual success signal wise U.S. military decisions? Or does it indicate that the 9/11 attack—the al Qaeda hijackers used American weapons against American targets—was a one-off event that has become far more difficult to duplicate as the U.S. tightened its defenses?

The answer, of course, is that the nation’s success in combating terrorism since 9/11 is due to a bit of both. In Afghanistan, Bush pounded al Qaeda and the Taliban government that gave it sanctuary. Then he invaded Iraq, juggling two wars and winning neither. It was on Obama’s watch that the war on terror—a phrase Obama dislikes—[downshifted](https://www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/framework.Report%5FFinal.pdf) into a worldwide, but quieter, campaign. It has consisted largely of drones strikes and clandestine military attacks that can be sustained, perhaps indefinitely. He got the supreme satisfaction of telling the nation on the night of May 2, 2011, that “the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden.” But the rise of ISIS in Iraq and Syria has forced Obama to backpedal, and redeploy 5,000 troops to the region to “destroy” the self-declared Islamic caliphate.


When it comes to the war on terror, the question that will outlive the Obama presidency is: did he do enough? Most of the smaller terrorist attacks on U.S. soil since 9/11 are so-called “lone wolf” attacks, generally carried out by radicalized Americans and very hard to stop. As President, Obama has rarely stepped up into the bully pulpit traditionally used by wartime commanders-in-chief to rally public support. But these aren’t traditional wars, Obama has noted. He has taken the long view—that the fight against Islamic extremism is going to be more marathon than sprint—and that a steady, persistent campaign will eventually crush such terrorists.

Yet some analysts argue that by adapting a less forward-leaning U.S. approach, the world has grown more dangerous on Obama’s watch. The rise of ISIS has unnerved nations around the world, and triggered refugee flows that has sent cracks deeper into European fault lines. Both Russia and China are expanding their spheres of influence without significant U.S. pushback. North Korea keeps firing missiles, and Iran—despite 2015’s nuclear accord—shows little sign of reforming its theocratic ways. Libya has turned violent, and largely ungoverned, since the U.S. and NATO helped Libyan rebels remove longtime dictator Muammar Gaddafi in 2011\. All of these places can turn into incubators for terror.


“President Obama’s speech was nothing more than a feeble attempt to evade the harsh judgment of history,” Sen. John McCain, the Arizona Republican who chairs the armed services committee and ran against Obama in 2008, said. “But to the American people, our emboldened enemies, and our dispirited allies, his legacy on counterterrorism is unmistakably clear: a disastrous withdrawal from Iraq, the terrorist rampage of \[ISIS\], an indecisive approach to the war in Afghanistan that has empowered the Taliban, and an indifferent approach to the carnage in Syria on which our terrorist enemies have thrived.” Several hours before Obama spoke, McCain said it’s time for a change in U.S. counter-terrorism policy. “When our next President is inaugurated just six weeks from now,” he said at a hearing on the global threats facing the U.S., “he will look at out on the world on fire and have several consequential strategic choices to make.”


President-elect Trump has scant foreign-policy experience, and his advisers are telling him to take a tougher line with Tehran. Yet given the relatively low-grade fever that terrorism has become, the nation is in no mood to launch a third war requiring years of fighting and thousands of American deaths. But Trump doesn’t have to choose between the separate paths blazed by the two Presidents who came before. His challenge will be to meld the best of both into a policy that keeps Americans safe on his watch, too.


## Transcript

I was just told that was going to be the last Hail to the Chief on the road and it got me kind of sentimental. As we speak, ISIL faces an offensive on Mosul from Iraqi troops and coalition support. That's the largest remaining city that it controls. Meanwhile in Syria, ISIL's self declared capital in Raqqa is being squeezed. We have attacked ISIL's financial lifeline, destroying hundred of millions of dollars of oil and cash reserves. The bottom line is we are breaking the back of ISIL, we are taking away its safe havens and we have [ APPLAUSE ] And, and we've accomplished all this at a cost of $ 10 billion over two years.

Which the same amount that we use to spent in one month at the height of the Iraq war. We should take great pride in the progress that we've made over the last state years No foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland. [ APPLAUSE ] And it's not because they didn't try. So rather than offer false promises that we can eliminate terrorism by dropping more bombs, or deploying more and more troops, or fencing ourselves off from the rest of the world, we have to take a long view of the terrorist threat. And we have to pursue a smart strategy that can be sustained.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/"},"headline":"The Jury's Out on Obama's Terror Fight","datePublished":"2016-12-06T22:46:39.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:54:53.346Z","description":"His claim of success could collapse if there's another 9/11-scale attack","url":"https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/","keywords":["Terrorism","Military","White House","President Obama","National Security"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta93f4be10d0ad83c/6988b1f40b72e3efdf6ebf7d/gettyimages-628080856.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta93f4be10d0ad83c/6988b1f40b72e3efdf6ebf7d/gettyimages-628080856.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US-POLITICS-OBAMA","caption":"US-POLITICS-OBAMA","creditText":"Mandel Ngan / AFP / Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/terrorism/","name":"Terrorism"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/","name":"The Jury's Out on Obama's Terror Fight"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"President Obama Delivers Last Major National Security Speech","description":"President Barack Obama gave his last major national security speech as Commander-in-Chief on Tuesday. He summed up his administration’s counter-terrorism efforts over the past eight years.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/cHKOaLU0/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-12-06T22:47:52.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/cHKOaLU0.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/","duration":"PT2M22S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4592667/barack-obama-terrorism-speech-macdill/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

