--- title: Lawyer in Bush v. Gore: The 2016 Recount Is a Folly description: As if we haven’t already had an excess of presidential election madness this year, now comes a bit player demanding recounts. canonical: https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-11-30T19:07:44.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:54:54.449Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Lawyer in Bush v. Gore: The 2016 Recount Is a Folly og:description: 'Recounts are expensive, time-consuming distractions' og:url: https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Lawyer in Bush v. Gore: The 2016 Recount Is a Folly twitter:description: 'Recounts are expensive, time-consuming distractions' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Lawyer in _Bush v. Gore_: The 2016 Recount Is a Folly > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=38bed19a-cc92-4a77-9f70-dea16157f17b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=38bed19a-cc92-4a77-9f70-dea16157f17b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=38bed19a-cc92-4a77-9f70-dea16157f17b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=38bed19a-cc92-4a77-9f70-dea16157f17b&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) ## Video: What You Need to Know About the Wisconsin Recount [Watch (HLS stream): What You Need to Know About the Wisconsin Recount](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/O9ruawH1.m3u8) (1:26)  _Published 2016-11-28. The Wisconsin State Board of Elections has decided to move forward with a recount effort pushed by 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein. As deadlines loom in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Stein continued her push for battleground recounts on Monday._ by [Theodore B. Olson](https://time.com/author/theodore-b-olson/) ## Theodore B. Olson Nov 30, 2016 7:07 PM UTC by [Theodore B. Olson](https://time.com/author/theodore-b-olson/) ## Theodore B. Olson Nov 30, 2016 7:07 PM UTC As if we haven’t already had an excess of presidential election madness this year, now comes a bit player with 1% of the vote demanding recounts which cannot possibly help her in three states. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, who couldn’t get traction in molasses, is seeking to extend her 15 seconds of fame by seeking a complete manual recount of ballots in [Wisconsin](http://time.com/4583546/wisconsin-recount-vote-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-jill-stein/?iid=sr-link1), where 98.9% of some three million votes were cast for other candidates, and where Trump defeated Clinton by 22,000 votes. She is threatening to do the same in Michigan and Pennsylvania, which Donald Trump won by 10,000 and 70,000 votes, respectively, and she has apparently [raised](http://time.com/money/4584102/jill-stein-recount-fundraising-election-wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania/) millions of dollars from wealthy mischief-makers to finance her quixotic adventure. She admits to having zero evidence of voting improprieties to justify the recount; only “grave concerns” about the “integrity of the process” she alleged in one filing. The Clinton campaign, which also disclaims any “actual evidence” of voting misconduct, has jumped on Stein’s bandwagon. There is no evidence yet that the Clinton campaign put Stern up to her feckless frolic. Needless to say, these developments [irked Donald Trump](http://time.com/4585260/donald-trump-twitter-recount/?iid=sr-link3), who characteristically reacted by making a distracting and counterproductive assertion that millions of fraudulent votes had given Hillary Clinton the popular vote victory—which is irrelevant to a presidential election—thus providing unforced error credence to the otherwise baseless Stein/Clinton recount requests. Trump was excoriated during the campaign when he had the temerity to suggest that he would wait until there had been a vote before committing not to challenge the outcome of the vote-count. Clinton called his stance “horrifying;” she was apparently _shocked_ that any losing candidate would contest an election outcome. Now that the proverbial shoe is on the other foot, the notion of even an utterly hopeless challenge is apparently not so horrifying. Demands for recounts are occasionally justified in close races and often sought in good faith. Al Gore had ample justification to insist on a recount in Florida 16 years ago when initial counts had him trailing George Bush by a razor-thin margin in the 2000 presidential election—whatever one might think of the absurd manner in which the recount was attempted. But recounts are expensive, time-consuming distractions when the outcome of a presidential election is clear and the winner has begun the serious work of assembling a new government—a very difficult task in the best of times. Stein has reportedly raised over $6 million from individuals determined to undermine the legitimacy of the Trump election. There’s no other conceivable justification for it. And, the Clinton campaign—stung by a devastating and unanticipated defeat—is only too happy to play along, professing simply a passive observer role. But her lawyers at the same time assert an “obligation” to her millions of supporters “to participate” in the challenge. It didn’t take long for honor to metamorphize into a civic duty. Recounts should be reserved for seriously close races where there are legitimate, credible claims of misconduct, error or fraud. Especially in presidential elections where faith in the system is essential to the vital task of governing this country. President Nixon did the right thing in 1960 when he declined to challenge Jack Kennedy’s questionable victory in Illinois and elsewhere. Al Gore, similarly, graciously conceded after his unsuccessful challenges to the Florida vote in 2000. Presidential elections are by their very nature highly contentious. The stakes are high, the battles intense and drawn out, emotions are rubbed raw. But the Constitution and federal statutes specify timetables that require all questions about the tabulation of votes be resolved promptly after the November election and well before the January 20 inauguration. Our democracy depends on peaceful acceptance of the outcomes of presidential elections. Unnecessarily prolonging a divisive contest is corrosive and destructive. Stein and her enabling donors and abettors should give up and save their time and money for something constructive. They serve no good purpose with their ill-conceived challenges. ## Transcript [ MUSIC ] This should be a non partisan people powered effort to ensure that we can rely on the integrity and the security of our vote. [ MUSIC ] The right to vote. [ MUSIC ] Hi, sweetheart. Hi. How are you. Let's go inside and get out of this heat. Thank you. [ MUSIC ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/"},"headline":"Lawyer in Bush v. Gore: The 2016 Recount Is a Folly","datePublished":"2016-11-30T19:07:44.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:54:54.449Z","description":"'Recounts are expensive, time-consuming distractions'","url":"https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/","keywords":["Law","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Theodore B. Olson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/theodore-b-olson/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/law/","name":"Law"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/","name":"Lawyer in Bush v. Gore: The 2016 Recount Is a Folly"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"What You Need to Know About the Wisconsin Recount","description":"The Wisconsin State Board of Elections has decided to move forward with a recount effort pushed by 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein. As deadlines loom in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Stein continued her push for battleground recounts on Monday.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/O9ruawH1/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-11-28T21:55:18.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/O9ruawH1.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/","duration":"PT1M26S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4586501/theodore-olson-2016-recount/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```