--- title: Don't Let Uncertainty and Fear Destroy International Order description: It's been a bad month for international law. From continent to continent, governments have been shredding postwar international legal order. canonical: https://time.com/4548048/international-order-and-globalization/ author: Todd Tucker article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-31T14:56:59.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-23T01:28:24.729Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Don't Let Uncertainty and Fear Destroy International Order og:description: National leaders must defend globalization og:url: https://time.com/4548048/international-order-and-globalization/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ed55630b887619f/6988abd30a4a2212ca9cbd18/national-leaders-must-defend-globalization.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2560 og:image:height: 1440 og:image:alt: The World Expo 2010 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Don't Let Uncertainty and Fear Destroy International Order twitter:description: National leaders must defend globalization twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ed55630b887619f/6988abd30a4a2212ca9cbd18/national-leaders-must-defend-globalization.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Don't Let Uncertainty and Fear Destroy International Order > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7850bec4-7c0d-48ee-ad0e-84267b974761&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7850bec4-7c0d-48ee-ad0e-84267b974761&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=7850bec4-7c0d-48ee-ad0e-84267b974761&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7850bec4-7c0d-48ee-ad0e-84267b974761&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Todd Tucker](https://time.com/author/todd-tucker/) ## Todd Tucker Oct 31, 2016 2:56 PM UTC  CHINA. Shanghai World Expo 2010. CHINA. Shanghai World Expo 2010. Getty Images by [Todd Tucker](https://time.com/author/todd-tucker/) ## Todd Tucker Oct 31, 2016 2:56 PM UTC It’s been a bad month for international law. From continent to continent, governments have been shredding, rejecting or abandoning the postwar international legal order. Last Wednesday, [Gambia joined](http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/gambia-international-criminal-court-hague-yahya-jammeh-south-africa-burundi-a7380516.html) South Africa and Burundi in a growing exodus of African countries from the International Criminal Court. The week before, [Filipino leader Rodrigo Duterte agreed](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-philippines-idUSKCN12J10S) to drop his country’s hard-fought legal victory at The Hague’s Permanent Court of Arbitration, which found that Chinese naval encroachments in the South China Sea violated the Philippines’ rights under the U.N. law of the sea. Even Europe, the [birthplace of international law](https://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Civilizer-Nations-International-Lauterpacht/dp/0521548098/?tag=timecom-20), has not been immune. Case Study A was the U.K.’s decision earlier this year to exit the E.U. (“Brexit”). More recently, Wallonia—a Belgian region of three million people—[blocked a Canada-E.U. trade agreement](http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/european-business/explainer-ceta-wallonia-europe-and-canada/article32489554/). The deal took years to negotiate and promised to bring a population of 500 million on both sides of the Atlantic under a more unified market. What is driving this retreat to national borders? For one, rising inequality in many countries has led to a sense of anxiety and distrust of the wealthy. The polling firm [Greenberg Quinlan Rosner has found](http://www.citizen.org/documents/Greenberg-Polling-Memo-July-2016.pdf) that, while most voters tend to be pro-trade, they become much more skeptical when told that modern trade deals allow multinational companies (but not unions and environmental groups) to sue governments outside of national courts. Concern over this so-called [investor-state dispute settlement ](https://globalreports.columbia.edu/books/shadow-courts/)was part of what riled the Walloons. Such one-sided rights confirm the widespread belief of many that our system of government is rigged in favor of the rich. While [globalization is not “over,” ](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/22/business/international/european-union-canada-trade-agreement-ceta.html?%5Fr=0)as some news analyses have suggested, its legitimacy is certainly being called into question. Governments are also rethinking whether they delegated too much power to international judges in the first place. The International Criminal Court was founded in 2002 at The Hague as part of a decades’ long push in the wake of World War II to hold leaders accountable for genocide and other crimes against humanity. It has proven exceptionally willing to second-guess member governments in Africa, which by [some political science measures](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract%5Fid=1936132) is an indication of a laudable judicial independence. But at the international level, there can be such a thing as too much independence. After all, if a global court rules against states too much, the latter can simply opt out of the system. Compare this to national courts, which are much harder to opt out of. Finally, countries are realizing that, just because legal solutions to conflict exist, it doesn’t make politics any less important. Officials in the Philippines won the moral victory over China with their court case, but the [Communist Party leadership immediately](http://thediplomat.com/2016/07/international-law-wont-stop-china-in-the-south-china-sea/) made it clear that they would not change their military’s behavior just because an international court told them to. In contrast to this paper ruling, [Duterte was able to cut $24 billion in investment deals](http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-20/china-hails-deal-with-duterte-to-restart-south-china-sea-talks) on his state visit last week—something easier to accomplish with face-to-face diplomacy than litigation. Just because we live in uncertain times doesn’t mean that international cooperation is doomed to the ash heap of history. But national leaders need to better explain how their citizens—not just their companies—benefit from international rules. We need leadership on several fronts. In some cases, this will involve re-writing them to [make them more balanced.](http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2016/09/fix-isds-trade-deals-000204) The 12-nation Trans-Pacific Partnership presents such an opportunity, as both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have campaigned against it and called for a new type of trade deal that provides greater balance between special interests and the public interest. In other cases, it will require more restraint on the part of the international judges and prosecutors themselves. They can draw lessons from our national judges. Who would have thought that [conservative Supreme Court justices](http://www.wsj.com/articles/chief-justice-roberts-maneuvering-draws-in-courts-liberal-bloc-1404238811) would have backed liberal causes like gay rights or the Affordable Care Act? Reading the political tea leaves is [an often overlooked part](http://yonatanlupu.com/Lupu%20-%20International%20Judicial%20Legitimacy.pdf) of judges’ job description. Finally, our leaders need to reclaim the word “politics.” An earlier generation of American leaders, from Woodrow Wilson to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, understood that international [entanglements are more sustainable](https://www.amazon.com/Governing-World-History-Idea-Present/dp/0143123947?tag=timecom-20) when they have the public’s support. But that goes against another more [legalistic ](http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/675749.html)strain of thought in American life that thinks—to paraphrase Alexis De Tocqueville’s famous observation in 1835—that any political question can become a judicial one. Our litigiousness is apparently exportable. Early Thursday morning, Wallonia agreed to remove their opposition to the Canadian trade deal, in exchange for an [opinion from European courts ](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/27/belgium-reaches-deal-with-wallonia-over-eu-canada-trade-agreement)about the legality of the deal. Judges can’t solve globalization’s public relations problem. That’s politicians’ job, and the sooner they accept it, the more secure our economies will be. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4548048/international-order-and-globalization/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4548048/international-order-and-globalization/"},"headline":"Don't Let Uncertainty and Fear Destroy International Order","datePublished":"2016-10-31T14:56:59.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-23T01:28:24.729Z","description":"National leaders must defend globalization","url":"https://time.com/4548048/international-order-and-globalization/","keywords":["world affairs"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ed55630b887619f/6988abd30a4a2212ca9cbd18/national-leaders-must-defend-globalization.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Todd Tucker","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/todd-tucker/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4ed55630b887619f/6988abd30a4a2212ca9cbd18/national-leaders-must-defend-globalization.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"The World Expo 2010","caption":"The World Expo 2010","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4548048/international-order-and-globalization/","name":"Don't Let Uncertainty and Fear Destroy International Order"}}]}] ```