--- title: The Ultimate Insider Who Could Still Change the Game In the Oval Office description: There haven't been many exhilarating moments in Hillary Clinton's long slog to the presidency, but this may have been one of them: a gorgeous late-October... canonical: https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/ author: Joe Klein article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-27T09:47:41.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:42:07.677Z article:section: Politics og:title: The Ultimate Insider Who Could Still Change the Game In the Oval Office og:description: There haven't been many exhilarating moments in Hillary Clinton's long slog to the presidency, but this may have been one of them: a gorgeous late-October... og:url: https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Ultimate Insider Who Could Still Change the Game In the Oval Office twitter:description: There haven't been many exhilarating moments in Hillary Clinton's long slog to the presidency, but this may have been one of them: a gorgeous late-October... twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # The Ultimate Insider Who Could Still Change the Game In the Oval Office > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=6e879bc3-a40f-4646-98f1-2b0849a85e47&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=6e879bc3-a40f-4646-98f1-2b0849a85e47&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=6e879bc3-a40f-4646-98f1-2b0849a85e47&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. ## Video: Watch Elizabeth Warren Turn Donald Trump’s ‘Nasty Woman’ Line Against Him [Watch (HLS stream): Watch Elizabeth Warren Turn Donald Trump’s ‘Nasty Woman’ Line Against Him](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/1L4MkjcS.m3u8) (1:04)  _Published 2016-10-24. Sen. Elizabeth Warren used an offhand remark from the third presidential debate against Donald Trump Monday._ by [Joe Klein](https://time.com/author/joe-klein/) ## Joe Klein Oct 27, 2016 9:47 AM UTC by [Joe Klein](https://time.com/author/joe-klein/) ## Joe Klein Oct 27, 2016 9:47 AM UTC There haven’t been many exhilarating moments in Hillary Clinton’s long slog to the presidency, but this may have been one of them: a gorgeous late-October afternoon in New Hampshire, an outdoor rally amid the falling leaves, a stage full of female candidates–two for Congress, one for the Senate, one for President plus Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, leaving only one lonely guy (the candidate for governor). The women wore interesting colors–a perfect firehouse red for Warren; a lush violet for New Hampshire Governor Maggie Hassan; a cool, crisp sky blue for Clinton. This was a perfect reversal of fortune from the days when five of the six speakers would be men in blue suits with red ties, joined by a lone woman–a candidate for state treasurer, perhaps–also dressed in a navy blue suit. The tone was set by the incendiary Warren, who responded to Donald Trump’s calling Clinton a “nasty woman” in the third debate: “Get this, Donald–nasty women are tough. Nasty women are smart. And nasty women vote. And on Nov. 8, we nasty women are going to march our nasty feet to cast our nasty votes to get you out of our lives forever.” This is a matter of some significance. We are about to experience a radical change in American politics: a woman may well be our next President. It’s a transformation that’s been lost in the roil of the campaign. Clinton is so familiar a character that she has been disaggregated from her gender. She is the experienced candidate, the status quo candidate, the Establishment candidate; she is the awkward, slippery, morally challenged candidate. All true, but she is also a woman–and women are different from men. “I do have a lot of plans, I do. And I get criticized for having so many plans,” Clinton said, following Warren in New Hampshire. “Maybe it’s a bit of a women’s thing because we make lists. We do, we make lists, and we try to write down what we’re supposed to do and then cross them off as we go through the day.” It is difficult to imagine Donald Trump making a list–or doing many of the things Clinton would if she becomes President: listening to a complicated argument without interrupting, negotiating patiently with her opponents, looking before she leaps. These are not qualities exclusive to women, but they are more common to humans who do not suffer from testosterone poisoning. And given the profusion of masculine bluster in our politics, the unseemly leap into silly wars and overambitious programs, these are qualities that may nudge us toward a less hypercaffeinated politics. But wait a minute, you say: Didn’t Hillary Clinton leap into silly wars in Iraq and Libya; didn’t she try to push an ill-conceived, unnegotiated health care plan through an unwilling Congress in 1994? Doesn’t she say blustery things like “basket of deplorables” and “vast right-wing conspiracy”? Yes, and she’s gotten her head handed to her every time, which is where her other significant quality as a candidate comes in: experience. The fact that she’s been around for 30 years is derided as “more of the same,” but it isn’t–in fact, it’s a radical departure from the past three Presidents. Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama came to Washington as newbies, and suffered as a result. Hillary Clinton had a ringside seat as her husband struggled to pass a budget plan with exclusively Democratic votes in 1993, and she saw what happened when she tried to pass a health plan without negotiating with her opponents. She has grown more seasoned, more willing to compromise, over time, as a Senator and Secretary of State. This has been a presidential election about deficiencies rather than strengths. Trump’s deficiencies are overwhelming; Clinton’s are not inconsiderable. We’ve learned more about her awkward secrecy than about her lists of proposals. Some of those proposals are Democratic boilerplate; many of them depend on a faith in government that most Americans no longer share. It remains an open question how much of her imprudent overseas activism remains. This is also said to be an election about “change,” with Trump the superficial agent of disruption. People are said to be sick of politics as usual. But when you think about it, having an intellectually mature and experienced President would be a seismic shift away from the long run of “outsiders” in the Oval Office. And guys, if you don’t believe that having a female President would be a dramatic rupture from male governance, well, your wives probably have a list of reasons why it would. ## Transcript Get this, Donald. Nasty women are tough. Nasty women are smart. And nasty women vote. [ APPLAUSE ] And on November 8th, [ APPLAUSE ] We nasty women are gonna march our nasty feet [ APPLAUSE ] To cast our nasty votes [ APPLAUSE ] To get you out of our lives forever. [ APPLAUSE ] He thinks that because he has a mouthful of Tic Tacs that he can force himself on any woman within groping distance. [ APPLAUSE ] Well I got news for you Donald Trump. Women have had it with guys like you! [ APPLAUSE ] And And nasty women have really had it with guys like you. [ APPLAUSE ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/"},"headline":"The Ultimate Insider Who Could Still Change the Game In the Oval Office","datePublished":"2016-10-27T09:47:41.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:42:07.677Z","description":"There haven't been many exhilarating moments in Hillary Clinton's long slog to the presidency, but this may have been one of them: a gorgeous late-October...","url":"https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/","keywords":["Hillary Clinton","2016 Election"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Joe Klein","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/joe-klein/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/","name":"The Ultimate Insider Who Could Still Change the Game In the Oval Office"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Watch Elizabeth Warren Turn Donald Trump’s ‘Nasty Woman’ Line Against Him","description":"Sen. Elizabeth Warren used an offhand remark from the third presidential debate against Donald Trump Monday.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/1L4MkjcS/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-10-24T18:56:10.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/1L4MkjcS.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/","duration":"PT1M4S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4547318/the-ultimate-insider-who-could-still-change-the-game-in-the-oval-office/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```