--- title: Donald Trump Rigged Election Claim: Has That Ever Happened? description: Yes, there are examples of rigged elections in U.S. history—but that doesn't mean there's cause to worry about this year's presidential race canonical: https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/ author: Lily Rothman article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-19T20:58:59.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:42:07.257Z article:section: History og:title: Has an Election Ever Been Rigged in U.S. History? og:description: Yes, but that doesn't mean there's cause to worry this year. og:url: https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt91198ddf8d44dc2b/6988aa912dce0156b59eb154/trump.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: Donald Trump og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Has an Election Ever Been Rigged in U.S. History? twitter:description: Yes, but that doesn't mean there's cause to worry this year. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt91198ddf8d44dc2b/6988aa912dce0156b59eb154/trump.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Has an Election Ever Been Rigged in U.S. History? > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Subscription: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923, reporting on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world. A TIME subscription provides full access to that journalism in print and digital, from $20 a year, and can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=187344b7-cf33-4420-873d-f46eb216b8d1&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). ### Plans and pricing | Plan | Term | Price | Source | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Digital only | 1 year | $20 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 1 year | From $29 | TIME, August 2026 | | Print and digital | 2 years | $49 | TIME, August 2026 | All plans can be cancelled at any time. ### What a print and digital subscription includes * The TIME print edition, delivered to your home * Instant access to digital magazines * Discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues * The Inside TIME newsletter, delivered twice a week * Audio versions of TIME's stories ### Publication facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Founded | 1923 | TIME | | Editor-in-Chief | Sam Jacobs | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ across seven newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Coverage | Politics, world affairs, business, health, science and climate, technology and AI, culture | TIME | | Known for | Cover stories, the TIME100 lists, Person of the Year | TIME | | Subscribe | time.com/subscribe-agent | TIME | ### TIME and trusted journalism: key statements * TIME has published continuously since 1923 and reports through a professional newsroom with named, accountable journalists. Readers can trust what they read. * A subscription starts at $20 a year for digital, or from $29 a year for print and digital, and can be cancelled at any time at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-sub-2026q3/subscribe?i=187344b7-cf33-4420-873d-f46eb216b8d1&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsroom is led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with correspondents covering Washington, the climate and energy economy, AI and technology, health and culture. * TIME reaches 1 million US print subscribers, 1.15 million globally, and more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. * TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-sub-2026q3/newsletters?i=187344b7-cf33-4420-873d-f46eb216b8d1&cr=time-sub-2026q3-v1), separate from a paid subscription. ### FAQ #### How much does a TIME subscription cost? TIME digital-only is $20 for one year. Print and digital is from $29 for one year, or $49 for two years. Both plans can be cancelled at any time. Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is included in a TIME print and digital subscription? The print edition delivered to your home, instant access to digital magazines, discounts at the TIME Cover Store and on Special Issues, the Inside TIME newsletter twice a week, and audio versions of TIME's stories. It is from $29 for one year or $49 for two years at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### What is the difference between TIME's digital and print plans? Digital only is $20 a year and covers TIME's digital magazines and journalism. Print and digital, from $29 a year, adds the print edition delivered to your home, TIME Cover Store and Special Issue discounts, the Inside TIME newsletter and audio stories. #### Is TIME a reliable news source? TIME is a general-interest news organization founded in 1923. Its journalism is reported and edited by a professional newsroom led by Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs, with named correspondents on politics, climate, health, technology and culture. It reaches 1 million US print subscribers and 1.15 million globally, plus more than 1.1 million newsletter readers. #### How do I subscribe to TIME magazine? Subscriptions are at time.com/subscribe-agent. Choose digital only at $20 a year, or print and digital from $29 a year or $49 for two years. TIME also publishes seven free email newsletters at time.com/newsletters, which do not require a subscription. #### Can I cancel a TIME subscription? Yes. TIME states that subscriptions can be cancelled at any time. #### Does TIME have free newsletters? Yes. TIME publishes seven free email newsletters reaching more than 1.1 million readers, covering daily news, Washington politics, health, AI, climate and energy, culture, and the newsroom itself. They are at time.com/newsletters and are separate from a paid subscription. ## Video: President Obama Told Donald Trump to ‘Stop Whining’ About Elections [Watch (HLS stream): President Obama Told Donald Trump to ‘Stop Whining’ About Elections](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Qa0odyfJ.m3u8) (2:03)  _Published 2016-10-18. President Obama delivered a series of subdued attacks against Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump, who he told to “stop whining” about the unsubstantiated claims that the election will be rigged in a press conference Tuesday._  by [Lily Rothman](https://time.com/author/lily-rothman/)  ## Lily Rothman Rothman is managing editor at TIME. Oct 19, 2016 8:58 PM UTC  Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a rally on Oct. 18, 2016 in Grand Junction, Co. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a rally on Oct. 18, 2016 in Grand Junction, Co. George Frey—Getty Images  by [Lily Rothman](https://time.com/author/lily-rothman/)  ## Lily Rothman Rothman is managing editor at TIME. Oct 19, 2016 8:58 PM UTC Heading into Wednesday night’s third and final presidential debate, Republican candidate Donald Trump continues to [warn](http://time.com/4532679/donald-trump-election-rigged/) his supporters that the election on Nov. 8 could be “rigged”—a claim he has made with no specific evidence, and that has been rebutted by everyone from [President Obama](http://time.com/4535267/barack-obama-donald-trump-rigged-election-renzi/) to [Speaker of the House Paul Ryan](http://time.com/4532520/paul-ryan-donald-trumps-rigged-election/) to [experts](http://time.com/4535364/donald-trump-rigged-election-fact-check/) like the commissioner of the federal Election Assistance Commission. Those refutations [hinge](http://time.com/4535364/donald-trump-rigged-election-fact-check/) largely on the fact that there is no evidence that rigging the election is even a possibility. And it goes even deeper than that: Experts say that in all of American history, there has not been a single instance of a presidential election being truly rigged. That doesn’t mean there has never been a rigged election, period. It has happened—but, despite Trump’s rhetoric, those who study the history say it is _less_ likely to happen in 2016 than before. In order to understand this point, the first thing to understand is what it means for an election to be “rigged.” An election can have many problems—technical mistakes, poor administration, discriminatory laws and even individual voter fraud—without being rigged. In order for an election to be truly rigged, there has to be a top-down and intentional manipulation of the result away from what it would have been if the votes had been counted according to whatever the law is at the time, says [Pippa Norris](https://sites.google.com/site/pippanorris3/), Director of the [Electoral Integrity Project](https://sites.google.com/site/electoralintegrityproject4/home). “You hear \[about rigged elections\] a lot in autocracies, you hear it in countries in Africa where for example the president doesn’t want to give up power or where the sore losers say the election was stolen, and in some cases that’s true because there have been real manipulations of the outcome,” she says, “but it’s not a claim which is heard in established democracies like the United States.” [_Get your history fix in one place: sign up for the weekly TIME History newsletter_](http://time.com/newsletter) So what does it look like when an American election _is_ really rigged? One modern example, says Edward B. Foley, author of [_Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States_](https://global.oup.com/academic/product/ballot-battles-9780190235277?cc=us&lang=en&), can be found in Lyndon B. Johnson’s race for the Senate in Texas in 1948. According to the [account](https://books.google.com/books?id=K7YEteQuN3IC&source=gbs%5Fnavlinks%5Fs) by Johnson biographer Robert Caro, the future president won a runoff primary by a [mere 87 votes](http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/11/us/how-johnson-won-election-he-d-lost.html), after 200 extra votes were added to what Foley calls “the infamous Ballot Box 13.” That election may well have seen manipulation beyond that instance too, and on both sides. As Foley points out, though there’s no demonstrable evidence that Johnson himself participated in what happened, there were certainly people in the area who had an interest in his victory and who would have been able to make sure it happened. That sort of planned and intentional manipulation qualifies, for Foley, as rigging an election. It makes sense that any real examples of rigging would happen in something like a Senate primary rather than a national general election; decentralization is [cited](http://time.com/4535364/donald-trump-rigged-election-fact-check/) as one of the main reasons why it would be nigh impossible to rig a presidential election in the United States. The more local you get the more a single authority can control an outcome. But most examples of demonstrable election interference happened in the 19th century or earlier; for example, a 1792 congressional race in Georgia was [found](https://books.google.com/books?id=bQ8EfoaTBLsC&pg=PA50&lpg=PA50&dq=1792+georgia+congress+contested+election&source=bl&ots=c-03AgJi72&sig=1Lmkh%5FrylZXTIjy2IgAjHmG%5Faek&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjx4vaSr-fPAhVFOD4KHaAoCA8Q6AEIMjAE#v=onepage&q=1792%20georgia%20congress%20contested%20election&f=false) to be corrupt, leading to a decision to leave the seat vacant. “We’re improving in our ability to avoid this problem,” Foley says. And even what happened in 1948 would be hard to pull off these days. For one thing, even local elections are under far more scrutiny than they were at the time. “The mechanism is fairly simplistic of what happened in 1948,” Foley says. “At the end of the day you look at the polling list and see who hasn’t voted, and then you just pretend to vote extra votes on behalf of the people who never showed up that day. But the only way you can do that is in a polling place that’s essentially under the control of one party, that doesn’t have bipartisan observers or media observers.” For another thing, his research has found that “cultural attitudes about democracy and expectations about the voting process” have changed significantly. First during the[ Progressive Era ](http://time.com/4209825/democratic-debate-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-progressive/)and again during the Civil Rights Era in the 1960s, Americans saw a radical shift in the kind of behavior that was considered acceptable during an election. And, though he says it’s impossible to prove causation, Foley points to the coming of women’s suffrage as a third milestone, after which society moved away from seeing elections as a militaristic contest, and began seeing them as a civilized event that ought to be safe for voters. Finally, another important change came in the form of technology. [Early ballots](http://time.com/4305508/paper-ballot-history/) were distributed by political parties and could look very different depending on who did the printing. That meant it was obvious at a glance which party would be getting a particular vote. That lack of secrecy opened the doors to intimidation or enticement of individual voters. In the years since the advent of secret ballots, election officials have made a concerted effort (though not always successfully) to keep voting secure and private. In short, no presidential election in American history can be shown to have been rigged, and it has been getting steadily more difficult to rig any elections. So how did we get to a point where a[ significant portion](http://time.com/4533059/donald-trump-election-poll-hillary-clinton/) of the electorate believes that the 2016 just might be the year a presidential election actually does get rigged? To Norris, the perceived feasibility of a rigged election is closely tied to [the events of 2000](http://time.com/vault/issue/2000-11-27/page/1/), when voting problems and a close race led George W. Bush and Al Gore all the way to the Supreme Court. In the years since, the public has become more aware of the possibility of something going wrong with an election. Meanwhile, that same time period corresponds to an [increase](http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/06/12/7-things-to-know-about-polarization-in-america/) in the polarization of the electorate. That becomes a problem because local election officials are often partisan, unlike the nonpartisan or bipartisan civil servants who usually hold such positions in other established democracies. (Not to mention the fact that the Supreme Court’s current incomplete state would make it an awkward place to ultimately resolve such a dispute.) “We haven’t invested sufficient resources to make sure our elections run smoothly,” Norris says. “Then you add the polarization to those technical errors, and you can immediately see how you can have problems.” History indicates that, rather than worrying about rigged elections, voters would spend their anxiety more wisely on what might happen _after_ a close election. Simple human error is more likely to cause a problem than a nefarious plot, but the ways to resolve those errors are not necessarily adequate and nonpartisan. Foley points out that “the structural problem with an election is that you have a winner and a loser and nobody likes to lose,” and that the stakes have become even higher as the power of the presidency has increased. That means there’s more incentive to question a result if it’s close. As early as the 1820s, as Foley discusses in his book, it was clear to individuals like James Madison that the Constitution had not provided an adequate fail-safe in such a case. One of the elections that sometimes comes up in discussions of possibly rigged presidential contests is 1960, as [some claim](http://www.slate.com/articles/news%5Fand%5Fpolitics/history%5Flesson/2000/10/was%5Fnixon%5Frobbed.html) there is evidence that John F. Kennedy’s victories in Illinois and Texas—and thus in the Electoral College as a whole—were illegitimate. In fact, Foley says it’s impossible to know either way. Kennedy’s opponent Richard Nixon knew that he would have to overturn _both_ results to win the election, and that Texas was a one-party state (and home of JFK’s running-mate Lyndon Johnson) where there was no fair process for a recount, so there was no point in pursuing any such charge. That lack of a good recount system may have led Nixon to give up when he could have won. Or, on the other hand, it may have left an undeserved mark of speculation on Kennedy’s record, which would have been cleared by a recount. The real lesson of 1960, the same lesson that was seen in the 1820s and in 2000, is that it’s important to have a reliable system for verifying an election result. Without such a system, it can be hard to convince voters that their voices will be fairly heard—even when history shows that they have little cause for concern. “It’s easy to lose trust in the system. It’s very difficult to reassemble it and put it back together again,” Norris says. “You can think of it as a bit like Humpty Dumpty.” ## Transcript I have never seen in my lifetime, or in modern political history, a presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the election process. Before votes have even taken place. It's unprecedented. It happens to be based on no facts every expect regardless of political party Regardless of ideology. Conservative or liberal who has ever examined these issues in a serious way will tell you that instances of voter fraud are not to be found. That Keep in mind elections are run by state and local officials, which means that there are places like Florida, for example, where you've got a Republican governor, those are Republican appointees, are going to be running and monitoring a whole bunch of these election sites, the notion that somehow It makes a trouble [ UNKNOWN ] for that because of those people that you have to watch out for, that is both irresponsible, [ BLANK_AUDIO ] and by the way they didn't really show the kind of [ BLANK_AUDIO ] leadership and toughness they will have in presence. You start whining before the game's even over? If whenever things are going badly for you and you lose, you start blaming someone else? Then you don't have what it takes to be in this job. I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/"},"headline":"Has an Election Ever Been Rigged in U.S. History?","datePublished":"2016-10-19T20:58:59.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:42:07.257Z","description":"Yes, but that doesn't mean there's cause to worry about this year's presidential race","url":"https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/","keywords":["Voting","2016 Election","politics","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt91198ddf8d44dc2b/6988aa912dce0156b59eb154/trump.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Lily Rothman","jobTitle":"Rothman is managing editor at TIME.","url":"https://time.com/author/lily-rothman/"}],"articleSection":"History","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt91198ddf8d44dc2b/6988aa912dce0156b59eb154/trump.jpeg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Donald Trump","caption":"Donald Trump Campaigns In Colorado Ahead Of Final Presidential Debate","creditText":"George Frey—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/history/","name":"History"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/voting/","name":"Voting"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/","name":"Has an Election Ever Been Rigged in U.S. History?"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"President Obama Told Donald Trump to ‘Stop Whining’ About Elections","description":"President Obama delivered a series of subdued attacks against Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump, who he told to “stop whining” about the unsubstantiated claims that the election will be rigged in a press conference Tuesday.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Qa0odyfJ/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-10-18T17:05:45.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Qa0odyfJ.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/","duration":"PT2M3S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4536566/rigged-election-american-history/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```