--- title: António Guterres' for U.N. Is the Right but Flawed Choice description: The next secretary-general of the United Nations, most everyone agreed, was supposed to be a woman. To be exact, a woman from Eastern Europe. canonical: https://time.com/4524860/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-flawed-process/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-10-10T14:15:57.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-07-09T08:19:45.744Z article:section: Ideas og:title: António Guterres Is the Right Choice for Secretary General. But the Process Is Flawed. og:description: Most everyone agreed the next Secretary General would be a woman og:url: https://time.com/4524860/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-flawed-process/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0c5356d035b39387/6988a95bab6d775c526ab82a/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-process.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3960 og:image:height: 2228 og:image:alt: Antonio Guterres press conference in Portugal og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: António Guterres Is the Right Choice for Secretary General. But the Process Is Flawed. twitter:description: Most everyone agreed the next Secretary General would be a woman twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0c5356d035b39387/6988a95bab6d775c526ab82a/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-process.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # António Guterres Is the Right Choice for U.N. Secretary General. But the Process Is Flawed. > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6e35b8bf-0c33-4390-bd1f-65beba68fa18&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6e35b8bf-0c33-4390-bd1f-65beba68fa18&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=6e35b8bf-0c33-4390-bd1f-65beba68fa18&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Adil Najam, Boston University / The Conversation](https://time.com/author/adil-najam/) ## Adil Najam, Boston University / The Conversation Oct 10, 2016 2:15 PM UTC  New appointed United Nations general secretary Antonio Guterres delivers a speech during a press conference in Lisbon, Portugal on October 6, 2016. New appointed United Nations general secretary Antonio Guterres delivers a speech during a press conference in Lisbon, Portugal on October 6, 2016. Rodrigo Cabrita—Anadolu Agency/Getty Images by [Adil Najam, Boston University / The Conversation](https://time.com/author/adil-najam/) ## Adil Najam, Boston University / The Conversation Oct 10, 2016 2:15 PM UTC The next secretary-general of the United Nations, most everyone agreed, was [supposed to be a woman](https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/10/02/the-next-u-n-secretary-general-should-be-a-woman/?utm%5Fterm=.c97aaf5255a7). To be exact, a woman from Eastern Europe. Now [it is clear](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/world/americas/antonio-guterres-un-secretary-general-united-nations.html) that it is going to be António Guterres, former prime minister of Portugal. Guterres is not from Eastern Europe. And he’s certainly not a woman. Guterres is generally considered [a good choice](https://www.yahoo.com/news/uns-ban-hails-likely-successor-guterres-superb-choice-005507878.html). The process by which he was chosen, less so. Among those who, like me, have long studied the United Nations and how it makes its leadership choices, hopes had been raised that this time around things would be different. They were, but not nearly as different as they needed to be if the process is to be seen as globally representative. ## A more open but still flawed process The way we choose the world’s chief diplomat has always been [badly flawed](http://www.un.org/pga/70/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2015/08/15-Dec-2015%5FAppointment-of-Secretary-General-15-December-2015.pdf). Essentially, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) find someone they can all live with. If even one says no to a candidate, the candidate is out. They then tell the rest of the Security Council, and ultimately the 193 states represented in U.N. General Assembly, to live with that choice. Invariably, they do. The result, most often, is a lowest-common-denominator choice. Someone who would not “rock the boat.” Someone who would not “spring surprises.” In the worst case, it gives you the super-pliant [Kurt Waldheim](https://archives.un.org/content/un-secretary-general-kurt-waldheim) (Austrian, 1986-1992) who elevated the role of the P5 even more. In the best case, you can get a [Dag Hammarskjöld](http://www.un.org/depts/dhl/dag/bio.htm) (Swedish, 1953-1961) who tried more than anyone else in that office to rise to the organization’s founding vision. This time, as the search for [Ban Ki-moon’s](https://www.un.org/sg/en) successor and the United Nation’s ninth secretary-general began, there were calls to make the process more transparent and more consultative with the rest of the member states. Cosmetically, it was. But, mostly, cosmetically. Largely on the valiant insistence of U.N. General Assembly President [Mogens Lykkeetoft](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mogens-lykketoft/dialogues-with-un-secretary-general-candidates%5Fb%5F10360246.html) from Denmark, an attempt was made to open up the process. For the first time ever, the candidates took part in public debates where they outlined their vision and priorities. These were globally televised. Informal dialogues with the U.N. General Assembly were held. A series of “straw polls” were taken in the Security Council, and results made public. All of this was new, and starkly different from prior processes which had been held entirely behind closed doors, with nothing except carefully planted rumors leaking out. At the end of it, however, it was the major powers who came out of the Security Council after their sixth straw poll to announce that they had a [“clear favorite.”](http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-un-secretary-general-antonio-guterres-20161005-snap-story.html) The choice had been, according to U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Powers, “remarkably uncontentious, uncontroversial.” There was no doubt in anyone’s mind whose choice it was. And, by this time, the choice was also no surprise. Guterres had [come out ahead in all six straw polls](http://www.wfuna.org/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/docs/unsc%5Fnextsg%5Fcolor%5Fballot%5F6.pdf). None of the six female candidates had consistent, or even significant, support. Nor did any of the candidates from Eastern Europe. At least one of the female candidates, Argentine Foreign Minister Susana Malcorra, was not fully confident of the process. Last month the journal [Foreign Policy](http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/05/u-n-s-steel-ceiling-blocks-first-woman-secretary-general/) reported her as saying, “You don’t have a chance if you’re a woman … It’s not a glass ceiling. It’s a steel ceiling.” The “steel ceiling” is not just for women. It is really for any candidate not backed by the P5. The [crucial sixth straw poll](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/06/world/americas/antonio-guterres-un-secretary-general-united-nations.html?%5Fr=1) on Oct. 5, 2016, was the one where the P5 could use their veto votes. Every candidate except for Guterres was vetoed by one or more of the P5\. Danilo Türk of Slovenia, who at one point had seemed like Guterres’ closest competition, was vetoed by as many as four of the permanent five. Four other candidates had three vetoes. Apparently, this was not a field of candidates that the P5 was very fond of. In short, the P5 made certain that António Guterres was the only one left standing. However, it should be noted that even he got only four of the P5 voting affirmatively for him. A mystery fifth permanent member chose the “no opinion” card, effectively abstaining and letting him be crowned as the “clear favorite.” The door, maybe, is not shut as tight as it once was. Light as well as sound can now peep through more than ever before. But at the end of the day, the process for selecting the secretary-general of the United Nations has remained the same. The P5 decided. Then they told the rest of the Security Council they expected a formal vote by acclamation. On Oct. 6, [they got that](http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=55224#.V%5FbKBjKZOL4). Now, they expect a consensus vote from the U.N. General Assembly. Most likely, they will get that too. On balance, the process of selecting the world’s diplomat-in-chief this time around became a little more public, and a lot more interesting. However, it is no less flawed than it ever was. ## A clear favorite By all indications, however, the choice that has been made is [a good one](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-un-election-ban-idUSKCN1261DE). Although the U.N. has never had a woman leading it during its 70 years of existence, and even though António Guterres, at 67, will become the second-oldest person to hold the office (Boutros Boutros-Ghali was 70 when he became U.N. Secretary-General), there is much to like about this choice. Guterres will be the first person to hold the office who has served as the chief executive of his country. Experience and a political sensibility can add much heft to the office. As prime minister of Portugal (1995-2002), and much more as the United Nations high commissioner for refugees (2005-2015), he has demonstrated a resolve to tackle tough problems. In the latter role, he was able to not only work with the major powers but to nudge – sometimes push – them to go where they might otherwise have not. This is a skill that should come in very handy in his new role. Probably the last thing Guterres is thinking about right now is how the 10th secretary-general of the United Nations – his successor – will be selected. One hopes, however, that someone is thinking about that question and how it will be answered in five years, or 10\. Hopefully, he would have helped open the process of selecting secretary-general even further – making it not just more public, but more representative. [_Adil Najam_](https://theconversation.com/profiles/adil-najam-213332) _is Dean at Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies,_ [_Boston University_](http://theconversation.com/institutions/boston-university-898) This article was originally published on [The Conversation](http://theconversation.com). Read the [original article](https://theconversation.com/antonio-guterres-to-be-the-next-un-secretary-general-good-choice-bad-process-64851). ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4524860/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-flawed-process/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4524860/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-flawed-process/"},"headline":"António Guterres Is the Right Choice for U.N. Secretary General. But the Process Is Flawed.","datePublished":"2016-10-10T14:15:57.000Z","dateModified":"2026-07-09T08:19:45.744Z","description":"Most everyone agreed the next Secretary General would be a woman from Eastern Europe","url":"https://time.com/4524860/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-flawed-process/","keywords":["United Nations"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0c5356d035b39387/6988a95bab6d775c526ab82a/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-process.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Adil Najam, Boston University / The Conversation"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0c5356d035b39387/6988a95bab6d775c526ab82a/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-process.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Antonio Guterres press conference in Portugal","caption":"New appointed United Nations general secretary Antonio Guterres delivers a speech during a press conference in Lisbon, Portugal on October 6, 2016.","creditText":"Rodrigo Cabrita—Anadolu Agency/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/united-nations/","name":"United Nations"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4524860/antonio-guterres-secretary-general-flawed-process/","name":"António Guterres Is the Right Choice for U.N. Secretary General. But the Process Is Flawed."}}]}] ```